Re: INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:59:47AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > When you update your ports via csup (not sure about portsnap), the INDEX > file **is not** updated. portsnap does update the index. -- Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-por

Re: INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:28:49PM +0100, Andre Wensing wrote: Does anyone know if INDEX has been updated recently? For some reason `pkg_version -IvL =` reports me that I've got newer ports than INDEX has: server# pkg_version -IvL = amavisd-new-2.6.1_1,1 >

Re: INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:28:49PM +0100, Andre Wensing wrote: > Does anyone know if INDEX has been updated recently? For some reason > `pkg_version -IvL =` reports me that I've got newer ports than INDEX has: > > server# pkg_version -IvL = > amavisd-new-2.6.1_1,1 > succeeds index

INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones

Hi, Does anyone know if INDEX has been updated recently? For some reason `pkg_version -IvL =` reports me that I've got newer ports than INDEX has: server# pkg_version -IvL = amavisd-new-2.6.1_1,1 > succeeds index (index has 2.6.1,1) cyrus-sasl-2.1.22_2 > succe