On 3 Oct 2012, at 19:40, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On October 3, 2012 1:21:47 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin wrote:
>
>>
>> The file name is the result of the command "git describe" and is
>> therefore stable. It consists of three parts:
>>
>> tag - number of commits - commit hash
>>
>> This project
--On October 3, 2012 1:21:47 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin
wrote:
The file name is the result of the command "git describe" and is
therefore stable. It consists of three parts:
tag - number of commits - commit hash
This project uses tags for versioning (which makes sense), so this file
name tells
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, David Wolfskill wrote:
What I do is maintain local private mirrors of the FreeBSD src, doc,
and ports SVN repositories, and check out what I want to use via svn
using those repositories. This does not require a password.
It is unlikely that most folks will want (let alone
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:54:31 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On October 2, 2012 11:28:12 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500
> > Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >
> >> --On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2 October 2012 14:3
On 10/2/2012 10:54 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
How do I handle this?
firnsy-barnyard2-v2-1.10-0-g2f5d496.tar.gz
Is the string at the end (g2f5d496) auto-generated? If so, that's
another problem.
I guess something like this? Sheesh. What a PITA.
PORTNAME= barnyard2-v2
PORTVERSION=1
On 2 October 2012 22:54, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On October 2, 2012 11:28:12 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500
>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>
>>> --On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl
>>>
--On October 2, 2012 11:28:12 PM +0200 Michael Gmelin
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler
wrote:
> On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl
> wrote:
>> I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:14:26 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler
> wrote:
> > On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl
> > wrote:
> >> I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need to
> >> update one of my ports. I used to do this by ch
--On October 2, 2012 2:44:46 PM -0400 Eitan Adler
wrote:
On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need to update
one of my ports. I used to do this by checking out the port into a
purpose-created directory in which I would use cv
On 2 October 2012 14:37, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I obviously wasn't very clear. I'm a port maintainer. I need to update one
> of my ports. I used to do this by checking out the port into a
> purpose-created directory in which I would use cvs to make changes and test.
> After everything checked ou
--On October 2, 2012 1:00:52 PM -0400 Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Paul Schmehl writes:
Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If
cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails.
If you rarely need more than the latest version of the ports tree, then
portsnap(8) is
On 2 October 2012 12:23, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm
> getting prompted for a password which fails.
There are a lot of answers to this question, and things are in the
midst of changing.
The as close to official answer as possi
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
> On 10/02/12 11:23, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>
>> Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs,
>> I'm getting prompted for a password which fails.
>>
>
>
> I think you are supposed to use *csup* or svn. But us
Paul Schmehl writes:
> Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If
> cvs, I'm getting prompted for a password which fails.
If you rarely need more than the latest version of the ports tree, then
portsnap(8) is worth strong consideration. If you have an existing setup
that'
On 10/02/12 11:23, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs,
I'm getting prompted for a password which fails.
I think you are supposed to use *csup* or svn. But use svn - it is
easy, and csup is going to be phased out very soon.
_
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:23:23AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm
> getting prompted for a password which fails.
That depends on the nature of the repository you are using.
What I do is maintain local private mirrors of th
Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs, I'm
getting prompted for a password which fails.
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
"It i
17 matches
Mail list logo
