Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
Chris Petrik wrote .. > I would be using the latest released ver not svn. That sounds like it could be a good idea, looking forward to see your port. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
Chris Petrik wrote .. > On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > John Marino wrote .. > >> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: > Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. > it doesn't work with base clang. > > However, clang in ports w

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Chris Petrik
On 03/17/2013 05:21 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: Chris Petrik wrote .. On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: John Marino wrote .. On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. However, cl

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
Chris Petrik wrote .. > On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > John Marino wrote .. > >> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: > Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. > it doesn't work with base clang. > > However, clang in ports w

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Chris Petrik
On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: John Marino wrote .. On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Chris Petrik
On 03/17/2013 04:14 PM, John Marino wrote: On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without issue.. so it really shou

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
John Marino wrote .. > On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: > >> > >> Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. > >> it doesn't work with base clang. > >> > >> However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from > >> svn without issue.. so it reall

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread John Marino
On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build some new GNUs

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Chris Petrik
On 03/17/2013 03:06 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: Waitman Gobble wrote .. Chris Petrik wrote .. Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-17 Thread Waitman Gobble
Waitman Gobble wrote .. > Chris Petrik wrote .. > > Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any > > commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot > > of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and

Re: Gnustep group

2013-03-16 Thread Waitman Gobble
Chris Petrik wrote .. > Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any > commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot > of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and > other means for gnustep

Gnustep group

2013-03-16 Thread Chris Petrik
Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and other means for gnustep ? Chris