2010/10/23 Konstantin Tokarev :
> Probably port of gimp-classic (or option in GIMP port to add this patch) would
> be better solution than using outdated version. UI is not the only component
> of
> GIMP being changed by developers
Thank you Konstantin for your support on the bugtracker, but I am
23.10.2010, 18:38, "Tomek CEDRO" :
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
>
>>> Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
>>> its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the
>>> nice features destroyed by a new design team in GIMP 2.6?
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
>> its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the
>> nice features destroyed by a new design team in GIMP 2.6?
>
> Haven't you tried to take in contact with GIMP
> Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
> its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the
> nice features destroyed by a new design team in GIMP 2.6?
Haven't you tried to take in contact with GIMP developers?
--
Regards,
Konstantin
I am really sick of idiotic GIMP 2.6 interface changes that destroys
my multi workspace work habits learned for over 10 years (mainly
related with menu available in toolbar). They want it to become more
photoshop alike. Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe
its not that bad idea to
