Bryan Drewery wrote:
Bryan, thanks for the quick reply, and apologies for my duplicate
post cock-up.
> > 2) Replace gnutls with gnutls3
>
> We will be doing (2) soon.
> >
> > or:
> >
> > 3) Use a bit of bsd.port.Mk magic to handle this situation - so that
> > if only gnutls3 is installed, th
> On Mar 31, 2014, at 20:32, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
>
> Hi. Many ports that require gnutls fail if security/gnutls3 and not
> security/gnutls are installed.
>
> ( E.G. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=186785 )
>
> Whilst seemingly gnutls and gnutls3 can co-exist, the ports
> that
Hi. Many ports that require gnutls fail if security/gnutls3 and not
security/gnutls are installed.
( E.G. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=186785 )
Whilst seemingly gnutls and gnutls3 can co-exist, the ports
that depend on gnutls being installed pass the lib dependency
when seeing the g
