On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:04:07AM +0300, Кутейников Дмитрий wrote:
> Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
> package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
> time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
> package
Note that some packages might not be available for certain architectures
and FreeBSD versions, because the packages are always lagging few days
or a week behind the ports tree. Or the package can't be compiled.
We can't add it to the official website easily, because we don't have
that information
`cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/` works properly but `pkg_add -r
openoffice.org` doesn't work.
And why don't you include these two lines of shell commands to official site
interface?
2007/12/20, Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +030
Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300:
> Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
> package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
> time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
> package server dif
Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what
command I sho
