Re: FreeBSD Port: vtwm-5.4.7_3

2012-11-01 Thread Abc Xyz
Yes, it seems that the default is to enable all possible features, but my point is that it would be a little more intelligent if "minimalist type packages" be built minimally, since that is their intention, their functionality. Some software is clearly "minimalist", and "minimalist users" want it

Re: FreeBSD Port: vtwm-5.4.7_3

2012-10-26 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:13:06AM +, Abc Xyz wrote: > Why is "rplay" being packaged with VTWM? > VTWM is supposed to be a minimal no-frills > window manager (I have used it for 15 years) > and I very much dislike the added dependencies > for things I don't care to use and violate the > spirit

FreeBSD Port: vtwm-5.4.7_3

2012-10-25 Thread Abc Xyz
Why is "rplay" being packaged with VTWM? VTWM is supposed to be a minimal no-frills window manager (I have used it for 15 years) and I very much dislike the added dependencies for things I don't care to use and violate the spirit of VTWM. I wrote the programmer that did this hack several years ago