On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:09:45 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > mtools doesn't use config options. You have to set them on the
> > command line when you install the port.
>
> When you install it, or when you build it?
Build, of course, although that also usually imp
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:35:15PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> > Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> > >> Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install
> > >> of mtools brings up a configuration menu in which the
> > >>
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> mtools doesn't use config options. You have to set them on the
> command line when you install the port.
When you install it, or when you build it?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:35:15PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> >> Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install of mtools brings
> >> up a configuration menu in which the WITHOUT_X11 option can be set? I
> >>
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:24:26 -0700
Cynthia Flynn <1cynthia2fly...@telus.net> wrote:
> Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> > On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> ... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> >>> [snip - syslinux pulls in too much X
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> when you do a make install for the mtools port, it does not prompt you
> if you would like to build the port without X11.
I think enough users have expressed the opinion (which I share) that
it would be reasonable to add an OPTION to this effect. We're fairly
well into the
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install of mtools brings
up a configuration menu in which the WITHOUT_X11 option can be set? I
do not remember seeing any such thing, but it has probably been 6
months since I
Over the years, my default make.conf has accumulated options to tell
ports not to include X11 dependencies. It doesn't always work, but I'd
never have known that something like mtools had a GUI option.
NOX11= yes
NO_X11= yes
WITHOUT_X11=yes
I haven't reaped the older declara
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Michel Talon wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Can we consider people who use the CLI an advanced user? If so, the
expectation that they will be able to build a port with -DWITHOUT_X11
is not unreasonable.
People who are more likely to use the GUI are the ones who will
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> Can we consider people who use the CLI an advanced user? If so, the
> expectation that they will be able to build a port with -DWITHOUT_X11
> is not unreasonable.
> People who are more likely to use the GUI are the ones who will not be
> aware of the WITHOUT_X11 knob.
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> Personally, I think it makes more sense for mtools to be
> the full and complete representation
> of the actual program.
Personnally i think that such opinion considerably harms the ports
system, by transforming some ports (fortunately not many) into
a kitchen sink of dep
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
[snip]
come directly from mtools
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
[snip]
come directly from mtools ...
Yeah. It look
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
[snip]
come directly from mtools ...
Yeah. It looks like mt
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > ... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> [snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
> > I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
> > [snip]
> > come directly from mtools ...
>
> Yeah. It looks like mtools uses X11 by default, which IMH
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:11:38 +0100
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
> I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
>
> > grep pkgdep /var/db/pkg/syslinux-3.72/+CONTENTS
>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the
> syslinux FreeBSD port:
>
> http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
>
> FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
>
> http://syslinux.zy
I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the
syslinux FreeBSD port:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-February/011548.html
Of more importance is H. Peter Anv
19 matches
Mail list logo
