Wesley Shields wrote on 11.04.2012 06:05:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35:46PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root
here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182
It looks like the ports have just been updated. Please let
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35:46PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root
> here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182
It looks like the ports have just been updated. Please let the update
mirror out and then update qui
Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root
here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 4/10/2012 06:14, Da Rock wrote:
> On 04/10/12 13:14, Mel Flynn wrote:
>> On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote:
>>
>>> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of
>>> the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one?
>> I'd like to divert your attention to the libn
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:31:13 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
> > Also, please show the content of your /etc/make.conf, it could be
> > that you are mangling include flags.
>
> make.conf:
>
>
> end of make.conf ;)
>
> Well thats not entirely accurate, I only have a USE_OPENSSL_BASE and
> the usual
On 04/10/12 18:06, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Da Rock
wrote:
On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote:
[ ... ]
If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the
fix is a reasonable procedure.
I was o
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Da Rock
wrote:
> On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote:
>> [ ... ]
If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the
fix is a reasonable procedure.
>>>
>>> I was only thinking the
On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote:
[ ... ]
If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is
a reasonable procedure.
I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test
themselves before commit. I k
On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote:
[ ... ]
>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix
>> is a reasonable procedure.
>
> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test
> themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer.
On 04/10/12 13:14, Mel Flynn wrote:
On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote:
So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of
the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one?
I'd like to divert your attention to the libnet source directory in
samba distribution. It's b
On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote:
> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of
> the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one?
I'd like to divert your attention to the libnet source directory in
samba distribution. It's built by default and integrated into
On 04/10/12 09:12, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Apr 9, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Da Rock wrote:
To drag this up again, I was thinking about the number of cases I've found like
this recently, and I was considering what the most appropriate action to take
here. This one is obviously controversial, and I
Hi--
On Apr 9, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> To drag this up again, I was thinking about the number of cases I've found
> like this recently, and I was considering what the most appropriate action to
> take here. This one is obviously controversial, and I didn't have the time to
> do more
On 04/08/12 09:59, Da Rock wrote:
On 04/08/12 00:02, Chris Rees wrote:
On 7 April 2012 13:51, Da
Rock wrote:
On 04/06/12 13:20, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
Hi!
Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
anything like this.
Sorry, it was on a clients system and I couldn't g
On 04/08/12 00:02, Chris Rees wrote:
On 7 April 2012 13:51, Da Rock wrote:
On 04/06/12 13:20, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
Hi!
Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
anything like this.
Sorry, it was on a clients system and I couldn't get the info across. I can
only say
On 7 April 2012 13:51, Da Rock wrote:
> On 04/06/12 13:20, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
>> anything like this.
>
> Sorry, it was on a clients system and I couldn't get the info across. I can
> only say for sure that insta
On 04/06/12 13:20, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
Hi!
Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
anything like this.
Sorry, it was on a clients system and I couldn't get the info across. I
can only say for sure that installing libnet fixed the issue.
The build error was an und
Hi!
Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from
anything like this.
Cheers.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Da Rock
wrote:
> Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during build on
> net/libnet. Maybe need to add this to the port?
>
> Cheers
__
Building samba 3.6, 3.5, 3.4... noticed a missing dependency during
build on net/libnet. Maybe need to add this to the port?
Cheers
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
19 matches
Mail list logo
