On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:22:09AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:22:09AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> > description. Top shows the process state as "fu_msg" and it is not
> > consuming any processor resources, just s
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > > > Sorry - should have been
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > > Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> > > description. Top shows the p
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> description. Top shows the process state as "fu_msg" and it is not
> consuming any processor resources, just seemingly sits there idling.
> Output from ps is:
>
> UID PID
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:20:17AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > The symptom is as described above - the gvfs-fuse-daemon processes do
> > not exit cleanly and more processes continue to build-up whenever I
> > complete an X-
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:20:17AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> The symptom is as described above - the gvfs-fuse-daemon processes do
> not exit cleanly and more processes continue to build-up whenever I
> complete an X-session. The processes do exit when I send them a
> manual kill signal. The only info
Hello.
I am seeing gvfs-fuse-daemon processes remain stuck in memory after
logging out of the system, and it appears that it may have something
to do with the fuse libraries. I asked about this on the FreeBSD
GNOME mailing list and it was suggested that I get the information to
the fusefs-libs ma
