grarpamp writes:
> Noticed that at least ports/i386/packages-9-stable is missing
> its CHECKSUM.MD5 file.
>
> Of course people shouldn't use it for what they think it's for,
> because it's not signed and uses a broken hash function.
> Hopefully that will be updated to signed sha1/256/3 before lon
Hey,
Thanks for your report I will take care of that.
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:15 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Noticed that at least ports/i386/packages-9-stable is missing
> its CHECKSUM.MD5 file.
>
> Of course people shouldn't use it for what they think it's for,
> because it's not signed and uses a b
Noticed that at least ports/i386/packages-9-stable is missing
its CHECKSUM.MD5 file.
Of course people shouldn't use it for what they think it's for,
because it's not signed and uses a broken hash function.
Hopefully that will be updated to signed sha1/256/3 before long.
However it does make for a