Hello!
2010/11/9 Alexey Shuvaev :
> In the case that you catch 2 or more sweeping updates it is very likely
> that you are updating across rather large time interval (half of a year
> or more). In this case I usually ignore all '-r' UPDATING entries and
> do just portmaster -a. The idea is that al
Hello!
2010/11/9 Doug Barton :
>> 20100530: suggests portmaster -w -r gettext
>> 20100328: suggests portmaster -r png-
>>
>> It would be nice to combine them as ' portmaster -w -r gettext -r
>> png-' to prevent double upgrade of relevant packages; however '-r' can
>
> OTOH, the code to handle the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:19:21AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 06:09, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
> >Hello!
> >
> > I wonder whether it's possible to automatically combine several
> >upgrades using portmaster. Suppose one have to handle both
> >ports/UPDATING entries:
> >
> >2010053
On 11/09/2010 06:09, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
I wonder whether it's possible to automatically combine several
upgrades using portmaster. Suppose one have to handle both
ports/UPDATING entries:
20100530: suggests portmaster -w -r gettext
20100328: suggests portmaster -r png-
It wo
Hello!
I wonder whether it's possible to automatically combine several
upgrades using portmaster. Suppose one have to handle both
ports/UPDATING entries:
20100530: suggests portmaster -w -r gettext
20100328: suggests portmaster -r png-
It would be nice to combine them as ' portmaster -w -r ge
