Hi!
> > Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ?
>
> Fixed the diff, and added a new one for ceph-devel as well.
Committed, thanks!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
>>
>> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
>
> Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?
>
> O
On 2-9-2017 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
>> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
> Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?
>
> Or should
Hi!
> > Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
> >
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
>
> I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
Oh, doesn't it need a CONFLICTS with ceph-devel ?
Or should ceph-devel be renamed ? Or ... ?
--
p..
Hi!
> Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
I had a look, looks fine except a few portlint -AC warnings.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
Could any of the interested submitters take a look at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221997
Has gone thru:
portlint -A
poudriere testport
Thanx,
--WjW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mai