On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:59:27 +0100, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>
>> I cant seem to get usb pass through working tho, when I go to add usb
>> device it says 'no devices available', do we need to manually setup the
>> device info ?
>
> Yeah i want to document it on the virtualbox wiki page but until t
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:09:05 +0200, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
> Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
>> Hi Testers.
>>
>> A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
>> efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
>> prob
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:06:52 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/2/19 Bernhard Fröhlich :
>> - Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
>>> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:21 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>>> > Hi Testers.
>>> >
>>> > A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
>>> >
On 2/19/11 2:30 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
On 02/18/11 11:58, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
Bernhard Froehlichwrote:
Hi Testers.
A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
efforts for FreeBSD. W
Hi!
Tested it against a windows 7-64:
VBoxHeadless --startvm win7-64 --vnc --vncport 5912
After approx. 24 hours, it crashed:
!!Assertion Failed!!
Expression: RTLockValidator
Location :
/usr/home/pi/myp/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.0.4_OSE/src/VBox/VMM/VMMR3/PDMBlkCache.cpp(654)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thinking this might be something with my VM settings, I created a new VM
with default settings and pointed it at the CentOS 5.5 64bit install
media, but it had the same behavior. The relevant bits from the messages
seem to be:
Feb 19 11:54:11 meatwad
2011/2/19 Bernhard Fröhlich :
> - Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
>> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:21 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> > Hi Testers.
>> >
>> > A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
>> > efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got some rather odd things in /var/log/messages:
HHHWWAHWWWAWCCWCCCAMCRMWCM0CARRCCMM00IRRI0MnIiCRnnICit0nitCIPCtUPnMiU
CcctpPpCMiuRRtP UC70PU0 IIcncipUut0 CIpn iPtc6UuuC
P 0Unc pip
cut pC2PuUu
c 3p5u4
1
HWACCMR0InitVM: ff836adb
On 18.02.2011 15:21, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
> problems were found that needed to be resolved first but most of the
> things are looking fine now and alm
Sorry, unixfreunde.de is sync now again.
- Martin
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
> Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
> > Hi Testers.
> >
> > A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> > efforts for FreeBSD. Wel
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
> On 02/18/11 11:58, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
> > Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Testers.
> > >
> > > A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> > > efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:21 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> > Hi Testers.
> >
> > A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> > efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
> > problems were found that ne
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:21 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> Hi Testers.
>
> A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
> problems were found that needed to be resolved first but most of the
> thing
On 02/18/11 11:58, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Hi Testers.
A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
problems were found that needed to be
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> Hi Testers.
>
> A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
> problems were found that needed to be resolved first but most of the
> thi
Hi!
> > What can I do to debug it ?
>
> A second start like this worked fine.
While doing a shutdown, this happened:
ipcDConnectService Stats
=> number of worker threads: 1
Segmentation fault: 11
But it did not drop a core file.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> Tested it against a windows sbs 2011 test install that I had
> prepared using the vbox 3.2.12 port. Harddisk images are
> on ZFSv28, amd64, freebsd-9.0-current.
>
> VBoxHeadless --startvm sbs11 --vnc --vncport 5911 --vncpass [...]
>
> vbox 4 crashed with a segfault.
>
> What can I do to d
Hi!
Tested it against a windows sbs 2011 test install that I had
prepared using the vbox 3.2.12 port. Harddisk images are
on ZFSv28, amd64, freebsd-9.0-current.
VBoxHeadless --startvm sbs11 --vnc --vncport 5911 --vncpass [...]
vbox 4 crashed with a segfault.
What can I do to debug it ?
--
p..
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:21:52 +0100
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> Hi Testers.
>
> A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
> efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
> problems were found that needed to be resolved first but most of the
> thi
I have been using the 4.0.2 version in our production system
running FreeBSD 8.2 with a dual xeon 6 cores (12 cpus seen in the
kernel)
running 8 windows XP and 2 windows 2003 nt.
besides it runs webserver, databases (postgres, mysql)... on the top
of a ZFS.. running for weeks at full load...
Congr
Hi Testers.
A few of you have probably wondered what happened to our VirtualBox
efforts for FreeBSD. Well it took a bit longer then expected and a few
problems were found that needed to be resolved first but most of the
things are looking fine now and almost all patches have been pushed
upstream w
21 matches
Mail list logo