On 22/09/2011 10:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
>> One question: committers -- would you prefer this as a .shar for a new
>> www/rt40 port, or as a diff against www/rt38 and repo-copy to www/rt40?
>>
>
> Please send it as a diff against rt38, as we'll do a repo copy.
>
Done. http://www.freebsd.org/c
On 22.09.2011 10:32, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
archives of all four from:
On 14/09/2011 11:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> > This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
>> > I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
>> > archives of all four from:
>> >
>> >http://www.infraca
On 14/09/2011 11:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> This port has dependencies on three perl modules not already ported, so
> I've created new ports for those as well. You can download .shar
> archives of all four from:
>
>http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/rt40.html
Ah. Apparently the thr
Dear all,
In the spirit of doing stuff rather than arguing about it, I've put
together a port of rt-4.0.2. That's Request Tracker, the popular
ticketing system from BestPractical.com. rt-3.6.x and rt-3.8.x are
already available in ports, but there's too much good stuff in the new
version to for
