On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:39:27 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
Thanks your work and the swift response.
>
> Regarding libc++ and 9.1-RELEASE, should not the libc++ port be fixed
> so that it works on 9.1-RELEASE, too? Maybe 8.X is out of reach, but
> aligned_alloc does not seem too intrusive, or is
Am 23.07.2013 23:39, schrieb Michael Gmelin:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:48:14 +0200
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Am 22.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Michael Gmelin:
>>
>>> I just tested building databases/db5 on 9.2-BETA1 (which ships with
>>> clang 3.3) using c++11 and libc++ and ran into the same probl
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:48:14 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 22.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Michael Gmelin:
>
> > I just tested building databases/db5 on 9.2-BETA1 (which ships with
> > clang 3.3) using c++11 and libc++ and ran into the same problem.
> > Dimitry's patch applied cleanly and resolved
Am 22.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Michael Gmelin:
> I just tested building databases/db5 on 9.2-BETA1 (which ships with
> clang 3.3) using c++11 and libc++ and ran into the same problem.
> Dimitry's patch applied cleanly and resolved the issue. Do you think
> you could commit his patch to db5?
General
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:27:53 +0200
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > No, db5 does not build because it is redefining a C++11 standard
> > library identifier, atomic_init(). It should probably prefix all
> > its internal defines with 'db_', to avoid collisions. The
> > db-5.3.21/src/dbinc/atomic.h file
