Simon Barner ha scritto:
Dear all,
I've been getting a lot of request for an update of the port to version
1.35.0.
I have put together a version and uploaded it to [1] for testing.
Features:
- boost and boost-python no longer conflict (boost-python just adds
the missing bits)
- Support fo
gards,
Simon
[1] http://home.leo.org/~barner/freebsd/boost-1.35.0.tar.gz
pgpDNrVLZcZSd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Right now we are working on prove of concept of underlaying algorithm,
a prototype, and a detailed specification. The prototype will be in
Java, since it is extremely easy to implement it, but I guess, it's not
desired to have java dependency fo
Hello,
Let me introduce the main ideas, and scope of the ports management
system, we currently call ports 2.0.
First, the confusion may result from the name, which looks like having
ambitions to completely replace ports system and infrastructure.
If we call "infrastructure" the ports director
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:54:23 -0500, David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Additional CCs added by Aryeh noted, but left untouched]
I wanted to retitle this post, but couldn't come up with a summary of
what I was trying to say.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aryeh M. Friedman
<[EMAIL PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Wood wrote:
| [Additional CCs added by Aryeh noted, but left untouched]
I removed the OP, Simon and Mezz since this has nothing to boost any
more and I changed the Alex Ryba cc to Alejandro Pulver because the
first was a misaddressing on my p
[Additional CCs added by Aryeh noted, but left untouched]
I wanted to retitle this post, but couldn't come up with a summary of
what I was trying to say.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aryeh M. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I am top posting because my comments are general and not in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am top posting because my comments are general and not in relationship
to any given point. I think Mezz along with Simon both the right way
to handle it for now. There are several projects that I am not
directly involved designed to tackle th
Dear Aryeh and all,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aryeh M. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Simon Barner wrote:
|> | Yes, I am working on a port. I will send a message to freebsd-ports
|> | once it is ready for testing.
|>
|> While your at it please make it so there is one boost port not b
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:27:42 -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Barner wrote:
|> | Yes, I am working on a port. I will send a message to freebsd-ports
|> | once it is ready for testing.
|>
|> While your at it please make it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Barner wrote:
|> | Yes, I am working on a port. I will send a message to freebsd-ports
|> | once it is ready for testing.
|>
|> While your at it please make it so there is one boost port not boost and
|> boost-python
|
| I will keep boost and bo
> | Yes, I am working on a port. I will send a message to freebsd-ports
> | once it is ready for testing.
>
> While your at it please make it so there is one boost port not boost and
> boost-python
I will keep boost and boost-python in seperate ports in order to
keep boost as lean as possible. b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Barner wrote:
| Jacobus Geluk wrote:
|> Hi, you seem to be the maintainer of the devel/boost port.
|>
|> Do you by any chance know if boost 1.35, which supports gcc 4.3 much
better
|> than boost 1.34, will be supported in a new version of the
Jacobus Geluk wrote:
> Hi, you seem to be the maintainer of the devel/boost port.
>
> Do you by any chance know if boost 1.35, which supports gcc 4.3 much better
> than boost 1.34, will be supported in a new version of the devel/boost port?
>
> Is someone else already working on that?
Yes, I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
