Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mips support forward). However,
> gcc vexes me.
This is not an answer to your question, but a related
In message: <20100302120308.ga53...@elmar.spoerlein.net>
Ulrich Spörlein writes:
: On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 23:51:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
: >
: > Let me back up...
: >
: > I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:51 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
>
> Let me back up...
>
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mips supp
On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 23:51:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
>
> Let me back up...
>
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mi
Hi Warner,
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:51 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
>
> Let me back up...
>
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported
... that builds part of FreeBSD?
Let me back up...
I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
relatively easy (once I ported our mips support forward). However,
gcc vexes me. It requires, to build libgcc
