On 05/14/2012 11:10 PM, b. f. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
>> large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
>> destroying any user-supplied depends.
>>
>> The use case for wanting to do this is to force devel/ccache to
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
> large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
> destroying any user-supplied depends.
>
> The use case for wanting to do this is to force devel/ccache to be a
> build dependency on all ports, for p
On May 14, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
> large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
> destroying any user-supplied depends.
Yes. I think this may even be intentional on the part of the variou
On 05/14/2012 06:25 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 14, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
>> large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
>> destroying any user-supplied depends.
>
> Yes. I think t
Hi,
I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a
large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus
destroying any user-supplied depends.
The use case for wanting to do this is to force devel/ccache to be a
build dependency on all ports, for package buildin
