Any alternatives to NONE cipher ssh or bbcp for gigabit+ zfs

I wrote viamillipede exactly for this eventuality. It's a resilient pipe to socket multiplexer for high throughput and can use mulitple l1,l2, l3 network paths. The initial version is in ports at net/viamillipede or you can follow the dev line : https://github.com/agokhale/viamillipede

Re: Any alternatives to NONE cipher ssh or bbcp for gigabit+ zfs send/recv?

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:12 AM Ronald Klop wrote: > Does mbuffer do the job for you? > Actually, it appears it does. :) Doing google searches for Niclas' suggestion of netcat brought up mbuffer. Some quick testing shows that should work for us. Jus

Re: Any alternatives to NONE cipher ssh or bbcp for gigabit+ zfs send/recv?

On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 19:13:24 +0200, Freddie Cash wrote: We have gigabit fibre between our main data centre and our off-site data centre across town. We do zfs send/recv of our backups between the sites over a dedicated gigabit fibre link. Our ZFS storage servers are running older AMD Opteron

Re: Any alternatives to NONE cipher ssh or bbcp for gigabit+ zfs send/recv?

On 2019-08-08 19:13, Freddie Cash wrote: We have gigabit fibre between our main data centre and our off-site data centre across town. We do zfs send/recv of our backups between the sites over a dedicated gigabit fibre link. Our ZFS storage servers are running older AMD Opteron (pre-bulldozer) C

Any alternatives to NONE cipher ssh or bbcp for gigabit+ zfs send/recv?

We have gigabit fibre between our main data centre and our off-site data centre across town. We do zfs send/recv of our backups between the sites over a dedicated gigabit fibre link. Our ZFS storage servers are running older AMD Opteron (pre-bulldozer) CPUs, so there's very little in the way of e