Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Matthias Andree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 19.07.2010 23:30, schrieb Doug Barton: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to >> follow 302 code. > > I've always wondered why we have that in the default

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > 2010/7/19 Doug Barton : >> >> We have already had the discussion about this issue and we're not going to >> be creating ports that download random files from VCS repos. So yes, the >> person/team who is responsible for the port will have to provide a tarball >> of a k

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:30:06PM -0700 I heard the voice of Doug Barton, and lo! it spake thus: > > I've always wondered why we have that in the defaults, perhaps > someone who knows can answer? If it served a valid purpose in the > past, but does not any longer, perhaps it's time to remove it?

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2010/7/19 Doug Barton : > > We have already had the discussion about this issue and we're not going to > be creating ports that download random files from VCS repos. So yes, the > person/team who is responsible for the port will have to provide a tarball > of a known-good version. But that's comple

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. I've always wondered why we have that in the defaults, perhaps someone who knows can answer? If it served a valid purpose in the past, but does not any lon

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
18.07.2010 22:28, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. It causes trouble when using some authenticated proxies. It also causes troubles with github which is more and more used. Lots of projects on github doesn't provi

Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-18 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. It causes trouble when using some authenticated proxies. It also causes troubles with github which is more and more used. Lots of projects on github doesn't provides distfiles, they rely on git tags automatic