On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:38:02 -0600, Mikhail T.
wrote:
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
people will complain.
Uhm, what is "throbber"? Could you elaborate?
The little
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
people will complain.
Uhm, what is "throbber"? Could you elaborate?
The little spinning things in the tabs, or the right hand
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:16:43PM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> >The throbber is pretty important UI for a browser. If you break it,
> >people will complain.
> Uhm, what is "throbber"? Could you elaborate?
The little spinning things in the tabs, or the right hand side of the
menu bar, which te
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:06:52PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Was not one of the advantages of APNG the fact, that a non-Animated PNG
reader will still show the first frame of the animation? In that case,
the icons will simply be non-animated...
The throbber
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:06:52PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Was not one of the advantages of APNG the fact, that a non-Animated PNG
> reader will still show the first frame of the animation? In that case,
> the icons will simply be non-animated...
The throbber is pretty important UI
Sent by Jeremy Lea:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Personally, I think, I'm in favor of the last approach, at least for
now that animated PNG (APNG) content is non-existent anyway
Except for many of the chrome icons in firefox, etc. i.e. doing th
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:10:59PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Personally, I think, I'm in favor of the last approach, at least for
> now that animated PNG (APNG) content is non-existent anyway
Except for many of the chrome icons in firefox, etc. i.e. doing this
with break firefox. Do n
= Especially now that APNG is pretty much out of the bag, my opinion is
= that the libpng people should either adopt APNG into their tree, or
= yield control over PNG to Mozilla.org. It's not about being the "right"
= thing to do, it is about avoiding a highly user-confusing feature-based
= fork o
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 23:02 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I recently pl
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it
works
> pretty well, btw). I was playin
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
> > pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
> > using the
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
using the system versions of a number of libraries, rather than relying
upon statically lin
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:28 +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here:
> > * http://littlesvr.ca/apng/.
> > This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest
> > source tr
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:22:34PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> One thing that I noticed was the APNG patch from here:
> * http://littlesvr.ca/apng/.
> This seems to be expected by Thunderbird and is part of the latest
> source tree. Mozilla has been maintaining a format spec here:
> * https://
Hello,
I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
using the system versions of a number of libraries, rather than relying
upon statically linking them into the project.
One thing that I noticed was th
15 matches
Mail list logo
