Aryeh Friedman writes:
> Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
> ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example
> x11-toolkits/vte produces:
I guess it's a user error, utmpx.h and utmp.h shouldn't both be present.
See similar issue
http://lists.f
On 4 June 2011 02:23, Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
>> No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
>> ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
>> vs. fixing base)
>
> I don't see any related
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
> ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example
> x11-toolkits/vte produces:
>
> gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
> discards
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
> ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
> vs. fixing base)
I don't see any related commits to 8-STABLE, which commit are you
refferi
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman
> wrote:
>> Some time in the last 2 w
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mv -f .deps/gnome-pty-helper.
