One thing you can also do is to provide better deprecation message,
recommending alternative/replacement for example, anything that would
help users.
regards,
Bapt
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/17 Lang Hai :
>>
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available
distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be exclude
On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/16 b. f. :
>> bapt wrote:
>>> I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
>>> where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
>>> doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
>>>
2011/6/17 Lang Hai :
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available
>>> distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from
>>> this depreciation.
>>
>> That is the way it is done, a
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available
>> distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from
>> this depreciation.
>
> That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be so
2011/6/17 b. f. :
> On 6/17/11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> 2011/6/16 b. f. :
>>> bapt wrote:
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available
> distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from
> this depreciation.
That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false
positive having people to doulble check is always good
On 6/17/11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/16 b. f. :
>> bapt wrote:
>>>I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
>>>where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
>>>doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
>>>
>>>Maybe some will b
2011/6/16 Diane Bruce :
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> 2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin :
>> > Hi all,
>> >
> ...
>> > Do not hesitate to manifest and undeprecate ports that would have
>> > deprecated by mistake. Even better do not hesitate to propose yourself
2011/6/16 b. f. :
> bapt wrote:
>>I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
>>where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
>>doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
>>
>>Maybe some will be false positive (I will try to not have too mu
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin :
> > Hi all,
> >
...
> > Do not hesitate to manifest and undeprecate ports that would have
> > deprecated by mistake. Even better do not hesitate to propose yourself
> > to maintain them.
I've poste
bapt wrote:
>I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
>where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
>doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
>
>Maybe some will be false positive (I will try to not have too much of them).
Could you p
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:38:34PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 16.06.2011 22:33, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
> >On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:24:42PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> >>16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
> >>>On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2011/6/16 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov :
> 16.06.2011 19:05, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
>>
>> 2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
>>> where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
>>> doesn't count excep
16.06.2011 19:05, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
Maybe some will be f
16.06.2011 22:33, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:24:42PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecati
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:24:42PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
> >On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
> >>>Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove
16.06.2011 21:54, Chris Rees пишет:
On 16 June 2011 18:24, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to rem
On 16 June 2011 18:24, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
16.06.2011 20:45, Alexey Shuvaev пишет:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin:
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
doesn't count
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:05:31PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
> > where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
> > doesn't count except if they are the
2011/6/16 Baptiste Daroussin :
> Hi all,
>
> I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
> where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
> doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
>
> Maybe some will be false positive (I will try to not h
Hi all,
I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports
where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors
doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course).
Maybe some will be false positive (I will try to not have too much of them).
Do not hesitate to
23 matches
Mail list logo
