I can confirm this issue is now resolved with the latest ports tree. Thanks
for your help Bryan and Bapt!
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 at 1:25 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:51:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 3/23/2015 11:44 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > > On 3/23/2015 11
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:51:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/23/2015 11:44 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 3/23/2015 11:39 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >> On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
> >>> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
> >>> keeps deleting
On 3/23/2015 11:44 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/23/2015 11:39 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>>> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
>>> keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because there is a new dependency
>>> (x11-fonts/deja
On 3/23/2015 11:39 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
>> keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because there is a new dependency
>> (x11-fonts/dejavu), and then having to rebuild a whole suit of pa
On 3/22/2015 5:28 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
> My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
> keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because there is a new dependency
> (x11-fonts/dejavu), and then having to rebuild a whole suit of packages as
> a result.
>
> The interesting thing
My poudriere is acting funny now, and I'm not sure if it's related. It
keeps deleting xorg-fonts-truetype because there is a new dependency
(x11-fonts/dejavu), and then having to rebuild a whole suit of packages as
a result.
The interesting thing is that dejavu was a dependency the entire time. It
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:37:13PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
>
> The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act
> differently
> and most of the time not correctly.
>
> The change will be done in m
Chris H wrote:
> P.S. Thanks for doing this. Consistency is nice! :)
Seconded. It has already been bugging me somewhat (not enough to complain,
but still) that different font ports are/were doing the exact same things
differently. Also, kudos for making the announcement so maintainers of
font por
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:50:56 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:37:13 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin
> > wrote
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
> > >
> > > The goal of
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:37:13 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
> >
> > The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act
> > differently and m
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:37:13 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
>
> The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act
> differently and most of the time not correctly.
..
> 3/ Move all fonts from ${LOCALBASE}/l
Hi all,
Some of you may have notice some work on the font area.
The goal of this work is to prevent every single font package to act differently
and most of the time not correctly.
The change will be done in multiple steps:
1/ Convert every ports to USES=fonts
2/ Remove @fc and @fontsdir keyword
12 matches
Mail list logo
