On 2013-07-19 09:05, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-07-18 21:33, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2013-07-18 21:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:04:09PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
Hm, I just picked the bugzilla44 port and struggle over the logs.
> ===> de-bugzilla-4
On 2013-07-18 21:33, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2013-07-18 21:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:04:09PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>>> Hm, I just picked the bugzilla44 port and struggle over the logs.
>>>
===> de-bugzilla-4.4 conflicts with installed package(s):
On 2013-07-18 21:09, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:04:09PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2013-07-17 18:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> If you are a committer or if you are maintainer it is highly recommanded for
>>> you to subscribe to the pkg-fallout ma
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:04:09PM +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2013-07-17 18:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If you are a committer or if you are maintainer it is highly recommanded for
> > you to subscribe to the pkg-fallout mailing list.
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pip
On 2013-07-17 18:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you are a committer or if you are maintainer it is highly recommanded for
> you to subscribe to the pkg-fallout mailing list.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkg-fallout
>
> This list receive all the failures mails f
On 07/18/13 10:04, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
The volume unsustainable.
You bet it is! Know you know what portmgr has been spending its time on
for all those years and why we keep sining the same old song about
quality control and
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:04:52AM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> You bet it is! Know you know what portmgr has been spending its time
> on for all those years and why we keep sining the same old song about
> quality control and pre-commit (and not post-commit) testing
ITYM "singing" :-)
In any e
>Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:04:52 +0200
>From: Erwin Lansing
>To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, po...@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout
>On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> The volume unsustainable.
>
>You bet
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> The volume unsustainable.
You bet it is! Know you know what portmgr has been spending its time on
for all those years and why we keep sining the same old song about
quality control and pre-commit (and not post-commit testing wa
On 07/18/13 00:14, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
The volume unsustainable.
I unsubscribed already.
Me too.
Subscribed yesterday evening; gone this morning.
I suggest the mail is sent to maintainers only.
This seems to me a far better solution.
Just my 2c.
bye
av.
The volume unsustainable.
I unsubscribed already.
I suggest the mail is sent to maintainers only.
For unmaintained ports something similar to pointyhat
would be helpful:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-8-previous/
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd
Hi all,
If you are a committer or if you are maintainer it is highly recommanded for
you to subscribe to the pkg-fallout mailing list.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkg-fallout
This list receive all the failures mails from the package building cluster.
Please keep in eye on this li
12 matches
Mail list logo
