Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-13 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:13:34 -0500, Kyle Evans said: | Hello! | The updated port includes a ZLIB flag that seems to be used for | inclusion/exclusion of the ezlib.* files, but ejabberd still attempts | to load ezlib.app and fails to do so with the default setup. Am I | missing something important

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-13 Thread Kyle Evans
Hello! The updated port includes a ZLIB flag that seems to be used for inclusion/exclusion of the ezlib.* files, but ejabberd still attempts to load ezlib.app and fails to do so with the default setup. Am I missing something important here? Thanks, Kyle Evans -- --Kyle Evans __

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-11 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:00:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger said: | Hi! || | https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-1.diff || || Correct URL is: https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-2.diff | The update hit the tree. Thanks for the persistence in providing | this patch!

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-11 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > | https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-1.diff > > Correct URL is: https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-2.diff The update hit the tree. Thanks for the persistence in providing this patch! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-10 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:59:02 +0530, ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) said: [...] | https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-1.diff Correct URL is: https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-2.diff | sha256: fe30991ecff239034127ee491b5ab279456517bbe9a078330d34b58341

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-10 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:50:27 +0100, Kurt Jaeger said: | Hi! || Thanks for reminding about it. I have fixed all the issues. Please find the || latest diff below: || || https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-1.diff || sha256: ea3adc38f58a3e4cdc9d52c6aa8fd84610ab24da82a22be1c368406b

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-09 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Thanks for reminding about it. I have fixed all the issues. Please find the > latest diff below: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/diffs/ejabberd-16.02-1.diff > sha256: ea3adc38f58a3e4cdc9d52c6aa8fd84610ab24da82a22be1c368406b5f09d1bc Now it misses some ezlib files, if I check with mak

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02

2016-03-09 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:40:52 +0100, Kurt Jaeger said: | Hi! || I have updated my diff to install the file at the expected location. Other || changes in this update is cleanup, and updation of dependencies tarball. | Please, may I suggest you test the resulting port with | portlint -AC | ? There

Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02 (was: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.01)

2016-03-08 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I have updated my diff to install the file at the expected location. Other > changes in this update is cleanup, and updation of dependencies tarball. Please, may I suggest you test the resulting port with portlint -AC ? There are a few issues, among them the exec/unexec in the pkg-plist,

[CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02 (was: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.01)

2016-03-08 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:19:46 +0100, Matthieu Volat said: | On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:27:11 +0530 | ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote: || On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 18:09:35 +0100, Matthieu Volat said: || || [...] || || Hi, || || | Ok, back on business! || || | My issue with the non-applied patchs