On 2014-08-20 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LD
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:55:41 +0200, Bryan Drewery
wrote:
On 8/21/2014 6:56 AM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:34:22 +0200, Bryan Drewery
wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and o
On 20/08/2014 18:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LD
On 8/26/2014 2:02 PM, Michael Jung wrote:
> On 2014-08-22 16:17, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
>>> On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
> i386 and amd64,
On 2014-08-22 16:17, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be add
On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
> On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added for earlier i386 release
On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LDFLAGS.
To enabl
2014-08-22 18:07, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Does clang (in 10-STABLE or CURRENT) support also the
option -fstack-protector-strong ?
Not sure if clang 3.4 has it,
On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:07, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only curren
On 8/21/2014 10:53 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added for earlier i386 rel
On 8/21/2014 9:31 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:05:46 +0200, Mathias Picker stated:
>
>> On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64,
On 8/21/2014 8:32 AM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 08/20/14 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added
On 8/21/2014 6:56 AM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:34:22 +0200, Bryan Drewery
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Su
On 8/21/2014 5:34 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>
>> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
>> respect LDFLAGS.
>
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:05:46 +0200, Mathias Picker stated:
>On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>> > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently
On Mi, 2014-08-20 at 11:34 -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
> > i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
> >
> > Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once a
On 08/20/14 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>
>> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
>>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:34:22 +0200, Bryan Drewery
wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports
Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LDFLAGS.
To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and re
Interesting. I wonder if this repo will get along with the new_xorg repo.
About to find out...
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Bryan Drewery
wrote:
> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
> > i386 and amd64, and ol
Am 20.08.2014 um 21:40 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
> I like that idea for a warning. We would have to ensure only ELF files
> are checked and probably exp-run it to avoid other false-positives.
And trivial programs (hello-world-style) will also cause false positives
there because there's nothing to in
On 8/20/2014 2:26 PM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 20.08.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
>
>> We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by
>> default for ports and packages.
>
> Oops. Sorry about being silent about that;
> I did enable WITH_SSP_PORTS=yes right after
Am 20.08.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Bryan Drewery:
> We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by
> default for ports and packages.
Oops. Sorry about being silent about that;
I did enable WITH_SSP_PORTS=yes right after the original announcement on
my main 9.3-amd64 developmen
Am 20.08.2014 um 20:10 schrieb Adam McDougall:
> I concur with Mark, with my 1400+ packages for workstations and servers,
> I have had zero issues. This seems like a pretty safe change. I just
> confirmed -fstack-protector is in my build logs although less frequently
> than I assumed for ports s
On 08/20/2014 13:20, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2014-08-20 18:34 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added for e
On 8/20/2014 12:20 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2014-08-20 18:34 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
>>> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>>>
>>> Support may be added for
For older versions of Freebsd add to /etc/make.conf
SSP_CFLAGS=-fstack-protector-all
SSP_CXXFLAGS=-fstack-protector-all
Should works.
2014-08-20 18:34 GMT+02:00 Bryan Drewery :
> On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 1
2014-08-20 18:34 Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect LDFLAG
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
>
> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
> respect LDFLAGS.
>
> To enable, just add WIT
29 matches
Mail list logo
