On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:21:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> What you are proposing is de-facto forking the whole open-source code
> base. This cannot work, and in fact steals the FreeBSD resources for
> something which has absolutely no relevance for FreeBSD project.
>From what I see th
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we
> need > to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs on
> the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like to
> ask you to have
Hi--
On Jun 11, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
>> to get ports on the right
>> track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and
Am 11.06.2013 21:22 schrieb "Konstantin Belousov" :
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we
need to get ports on the right
> > track. I have done several exp-runs on the curren
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:21:56PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
> > to get ports on the right
> > track. I have done several
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need
> to get ports on the right
> track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and we still have a
> lot of fallouts. We
> would like
On 2013-06-11 08:50, Martin Wilke wrote:
> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
> we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
> on the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like
> to ask you to have a look [1] at the faile
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 16:20, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
>> As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
>> we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
>> on the current src and we still have a lot of fallout
As someone familiar with doing ports but can't write a lick of code
beyond some basic scripting or Perl -- how can I help? Are there
guidelines for this project? Should we take known broken ports and test
them against different versions of GCC and CLANG in the ports tree until
we find one that work
On 11/06/2013 16:20, Martin Wilke wrote:
As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that
we need to get ports on the right track. I have done several exp-runs
on the current src and we still have a lot of fallouts. We would like
to ask you to have a look [1] at the failed por
Dear All,
As we all know FreeBSD 10 brings a new compiler along, and for that we need to
get ports on the right
track. I have done several exp-runs on the current src and we still have a lot
of fallouts. We
would like to ask you to have a look [1] at the failed ports and help to fix
them. We w
11 matches
Mail list logo
