Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-05-30 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Feb 22, 2017 11:36 AM, "rollingbits (Luc wrote: On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use po

Re: The future of portmaster

2017-02-22 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Feb 19, 2017 12:13 PM, "Matthias Andree" wrote: Am 17.02.2017 um 08:37 schrieb abi: > From my point of view, jails are overkill. Chroot should be enough and > it would be nice if portmaster starts building in clean environment. Please use poudriere or some other tool instead, there are some t

Re: pkg regressions and/or missing documentation

2016-06-07 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
On Jun 7, 2016 11:07 AM, "Michael Gmelin" wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:36:17 -0300 > "rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote: > > > I've a local package repository which I could access using pkg with > > the ssh scheme until the last update. I update the

pkg regressions and/or missing documentation

2016-06-02 Thread rollingbits (Lucas)
Hi. I've a local package repository which I could access using pkg with the ssh scheme until the last update. I update the packages once a week. pkg went from 1.7.2 to 1.8.3 here. The error message is that repository has the wrong URL scheme. I think there was a regression or missing documentation