> On 5 August 2020, at 23:57, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> 06.08.2020 13:23, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>>> On 5 August 2020, at 21:30, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>
>>> 06.08.2020 6:02, Tatsuki Makino wrote
>>> :
>>>> Is there any command
vnlite revert -R /usr/ports
svn: E155007: '/usr/ports' is not a working copy
master#
master# rm -rf /usr/ports/*
master# svnlite revert -R /usr/ports
svn: E155007: '/usr/ports' is not a working copy
-- Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
Is there any movement on this issue? I don't see a PR? I have an installation
facing this issue.
~Doug
From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org on
behalf of Dave Cottlehuber
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 9:34 AM
To: Kurt Jaeger; Ronald Klop
Cc: fr
C/8_3_2_2/export/msp430-gcc-support-files-1.209.zip
>
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slau646e/slau646e.pdf
>
Both links work for me in southern California.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
install such modules.
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Correct. There is no port tree. Packages are used exclusively
> On May 23, 2019, at 01:16, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2019, at 16:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> It appears that the dovecot package is now the one that is maintained and
>> dovecot2 package has remai
> On 22 May 2019, at 16:23, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie wrote on 2019/05/23 00:41:
>
> [...]
>
>> Unless you notice this interesting anomaly, you can get easily burned like I
>> did. I would recommend that either the dovecot2
interesting anomaly, you can get easily burned like I
did. I would recommend that either the dovecot2 package be deleted, or at
least kept current with the dovecot package.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org
feld-
Are there any plans to upgrade the unifi port to 5.10.21? I appear to be having
some difficulty running 5.10.20 on five APs and wondered if 5.10.21 would be
out any time soon?
~Doug
Doug Sampson
IT Administrator | DawnSignPress, Inc.
858-768-0486
do...@dawnsign.com<mailto
tems. I
can't imagine why the version numbers are so different. I expected to find the
version numbers and the dates identical between the two systems.
For the time being I'll copy the old versions of libssl, libcrypto, and
libarchive back onto the production system, but tha
> ---
> Yasuhiro KIMURA
I have filed my first ever bug report! Thank you!
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
version of foswiki newer than
2.1.3_1 have had these corrected.
Please consider this a request to upgrade the www/foswiki port to 2.1.6. Thank
you.
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-po
> On 23 March 2018, at 02:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> Am 17.02.2018 um 04:22 schrieb Doug Hardie:
>> I have encountered an interesting situation while trying to resolve a PR on
>> qpopper. I am unable to build qpopper on 11.1 (and probably 11.0) because
&g
le
someone is using them. Switching to the TLSv1_server_method will remove that
capability for them.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
> On 27 December 2017, at 16:05, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > On 27 December 2017, at 13:26, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> >> [...] Putting header fi
> On 27 December 2017, at 13:26, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> [...] Putting header files into the port is a non-starter as they MUST match
>> the kernel on which lsof is built. I added lsof to PORTS_MODULES so it is
>> rebuilt with any new kernel on m
t updates.
Let me know if you need additional documentation of the update process.
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> During upgrade of openfire from 4.1.5 to 4.16 the following error was
> observed:
>
> ===> Installing for openfire-4.1.6,1
> ===> Checking if openfire already installed
> ===> Registering installation for openfire-4.1.6,1
> Installing openfire-4.1.6,1...
> ===> Creating groups.
> Using exist
===>>> Update for net-im/openfire failed
===>>> Aborting update
===>>> There are messages from installed ports to display,
but first take a moment to review the error messages
above. Then press Enter when ready to proceed.
~Doug
dmap config dsp:range = 50001-6
> idmap config * : backend = tdb
> map readonly = no
> store dos attributes = Yes
> strict locking = No
> directory name cache size = 0
> map acl inherit = Yes
> admin users = DOMAIN-doug
map readonly = no
store dos attributes = Yes
strict locking = No
directory name cache size = 0
map acl inherit = Yes
admin users = DOMAIN-doug
hosts allow = 192.168.xxx. 192.168.xxx. 127. 10.8.
inherit owner = Yes
inherit permissions = Yes
up? Why would I need to apply patch(es) when installing for the first
time?
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thank you!
Best,
Doug
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:07 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I'm the developer of detox. I recently released v1.3.0, and you can find
> > it here. https://github.com/dharple/detox
>
> Update in the portstree done.
>
> --
> p.
Hello,
I'm the developer of detox. I recently released v1.3.0, and you can find
it here. https://github.com/dharple/detox
Best regards,
Doug Harple
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-por
r/bin/make all
> cc -c -I.. -I. -I.. -I../popper -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector
> -fno-strict-aliasing -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSETPROCTITLE -DFREEBSD -DUNIX
> flock.c -o flock.o
> cc -c -I.. -I. -I.. -I../popper -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector
> -fno-st
t; It was already done in ports r421193.
I just upgraded to the latest binutils and rebuilt mariadb* and things do seem
to be working properly now.
Thanks folks,
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" wrote:
> On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
>> dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
>> assuming that is no
Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
assuming that is not the intended result
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.7
#11 0x00408fec in main ()
I am going to try rebuilding with symbols.
Any ideas what is causing this or how to get around it?
pkg is clamav-milter-0.99.2
— Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
r which config options I select/deselect, it still fails to
rebuild. It occurs on both 10.3-RELEASE-p4 i386 and 10.3-RELEASE-p4 amd64
systems.
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I made a mistake trying to add a new package and had to update xfce. Among other
changes webkit2-gtk3 was updated from 2.8.5_2 to 2.8.5_3. This generated error
in some packages added including firefox, thunderbird, and xpad. These programs
fail with the error:
/usr/local/lib/libgtk-3.so.0: Un
Hello-
Are there any plans to update the net/reposado port in light of the changes
since last year?
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr
Hey George :)
Glad to hear that this will actually be useful for someone.
Doug
On 02/23/2016 06:09 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
thanks for this doug. we need to do this, this is hugely useful to us.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Doug Barton mailto:do...@dougbarton.us>> wrote:
W, I don't care if the patch is incorporated anywhere or not. But
since the work is already done I thought I'd share it in case it's
useful to someone.
best regards,
Doug
--- /etc/rc.d/named-orig 2014-10-22 21:25:01.0 +
+++ named_rec 2016-02-24 00:55:16.0 +
On 02/17/2016 12:32 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 17/02/2016 03:14, Doug Barton wrote:
Matthew,
When running cache-init for some time now I get this error:
cache-init:devel/tcllibc (tcllibc-1.18_1) Error. RUN_DEPENDS
/var/ports/devel/tcllib -- dependency is not a port
cache-init: /usr/ports
> On 22 February 2016, at 02:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On a FreeBSD 9.3 P33 system, I don't seem to be able to upgrade packages:
>>
>> sermons# pkg upgrade
>> Updating repository catal
our entry below.
> On 22 February 2016, at 00:56, Lars Engels wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On a FreeBSD 9.3 P33 system, I don't seem to be able to upgrade packages:
>>
>> sermons# pkg upgrade
>> Updating
On a FreeBSD 9.3 P33 system, I don't seem to be able to upgrade packages:
sermons# pkg upgrade
Updating repository catalogue
pkg:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest//repo.txz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
—
same error when I run 'make describe', so
I'm not quite sure what's happening.
hope this helps,
Doug
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
There is an error in the DISTFILES line in the games/libretro-cores
Makefile that breaks 'make describe'. I have no idea what the error is,
since the line is total gibberish, but if I comment it out the error
goes away.
hope this helps,
Doug
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On 5/9/15 10:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
According to the VUXML postfix 2.11.4 is vulnerable. The update was
released almost a month ago. Is a port update planned any time soon?
I see that the update was performed. Thanks! :)
Doug
--
I am conducting an experiment in the efficacy of PGP/MIME
According to the VUXML postfix 2.11.4 is vulnerable. The update was
released almost a month ago. Is a port update planned any time soon?
Doug
--
I am conducting an experiment in the efficacy of PGP/MIME signatures.
This message should be signed. If it is not, or the signature does not
> On 1 April 2015, at 14:21, Yuri wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example,
>>
>> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405
>>
>> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way
>
> On 3 March 2015, at 22:45, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
>
> Canonically and preferred:
>
> Set maintainer-approval flag to + *on the attachment/patch*.
>
> The maintainer-feedback flag is at the issue/bug scope, not the
> attachment/patch scope.
>
> This of course requires the maintainer-approva
I am the maintainer for a port. I received a suggested patch for the port that
is good. There used to be a link in the notification email to click on to
approve the patch. With the new port system, that is gone (or at least I
didn’t find it). I went through the porters manual and didn’t find
Greg Neagle has released an update to reposado
(https://github.com/wdas/reposado) involving a new option to remove config-data
attributes from product dist files five days ago.
When will we see this update in the FreeBSD ports tree?
~Doug
I posted this on questions earlier and got no response. In the meantime, I
have a system that is not really functional.
I needed to update clamav-milter. I used:
pkg upgrade clamav-milter
The result was an error:
Checking integrity... done (1 conflicting)
pkg: Cannot solve problem us
On 1/8/15 8:00 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
FYI:
===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for ports-mgmt/pkg <<<===
fetch: http://mirror.shatow.net/freebsd/pkg/pkg-1.4.4.tar.xz: Forbidden
... and again:
=> Attempting to fetch
http://distcache.eu.FreeBSD.org/local-distfiles
FYI:
===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for ports-mgmt/pkg <<<===
fetch: http://mirror.shatow.net/freebsd/pkg/pkg-1.4.4.tar.xz: Forbidden
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
l, to continue to support the
substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x.
Please cc me on your reply, as I am not subscribed to the list.
Thanks,
Doug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUr06JAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE4gAH/3QHW3HDmvgq6sM1yI/c00O/
mMayUGB34TtneYYh1lIZJD
why they haven't had a release prior
| to 8.3 EOL. That's probably an excellent question.
Maybe they are spending their limited resources on a 10.1 release?
The point people are raising is that this is breaking things for them
with no easy migration plan except an OS redo of which they mi
I think it might help those on the thread to see the objdump -x from the
"correct" and "incorrect" binary just to elucidate what is different.
On May 8, 2014, at 12:18 PM, John Hixson wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:01:41PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>
the output of 'objdump -x smbd' as well?
--
Doug White - iXsystems
dwh...@ixsystems.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
of apr1 fails.
When can we expect apache 2.2.7 port to be made available?
~Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 17 February 2014, at 21:43, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:07:43 -0800
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have an older, but basically clean, install of 8.2 on a production
>> system. It has a few ports that were installed back when 8.2 was
is there another way I need to
upgrade to ports files? Its my understanding that cvsup is no longer with us.
-- Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I am going to have to give up maintaining qpopper. Not because I don't have
the interest or time, but because I simply cannot update any port. The old
port system may have had issues, but it worked!!! The new one does not. I am
completely unable to upgrade or install any ports on a 9.1 or hi
On 12/28/2013 02:57 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 17:18:43 -0800 Doug Barton
wrote:
| What I proposed as part of this work years ago was to create something
| like a bind-config package that would (optionally) install the same
| default files and configuration for the port
when I catch updates
between bsd.port.mk commits cache-init isn't necessary in any case.
Doug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSvjPLAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEhkMIAKcsW5K8vXwpKrN7WVTWsWwE
QXpY4zPfjGnUY8bJyEvPkioxCO3QIZ6vOMJE7dGX6Gfij3SOpnZ1ty/1mkcQ
On 12/27/2013 04:00 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 25 décembre 2013 22:16:07 -0800 Doug Barton
wrote:
| While looking at the UPDATING entry for the bdb mess (more on that later)
| I happened to see this:
|
| 20131209:
|AFFECTS: users of dns/bind96, dns/bind98 and bind99 on FreeBSD 10.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/27/2013 04:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
|> The checksum won't match, and the next site in the MASTER_SITES
|> list
|>> will be checked, right? What is the downside of this redirect?
|>> Keep in mind that the site was once "approved" by th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/26/2013 02:55 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Thank you.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSvLvUAAoJEFzGhvEaGryES3MIAM7YTPgDnWy/BmNEM3Ctw/Ls
MzxCtwibdCYVuMxnLGHNybMK+I+VQYJrSfIiSpnhq9ioml9HzhdyNx
, but I think they
are related to underlying ports problems as they happened with db47 as
well as db5. The resultant INDEX seems to work Ok in spite of those
errors, but I haven't pushed it very hard yet.
Thanks for the response. :)
Doug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2
ldn't that argument go the other way around? Shouldn't the
people proposing the purge be the ones to provide _compelling_ reasons
to do the purge?
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On 12/25/2013 11:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I have used Matthew's p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for several years. In the
past it was a very valuable tool that allowed me to keep an INDEX up to
date relative to changes in the ports tree in seconds or minutes,
instead of having to do 'make in
Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on
purpose.
On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that the bash.1 and bashbugs.1 man pages do not get
compressed, and therefore the package fails.
n update planned to
handle this? Also, I just tried running cache-init with bdb 5, which
seemed to succeed, but running portindex generated a lot of suspicious
errors. I'll try again after reinstalling bdb 4.7, but I'm wondering if
this is a known issue.
Doug
_
Some of these have been around a while, but all of them make me wonder
how much testing is going on with all the mass changes lately:
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6756: Inconsistent operator for
check-makefile
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
cache-init: /usr/ports/chines
than to avoid having to go with the oracle
versions. Personally I would choose 4.7 for that, but reasonable
arguments can be made to include 4.8 instead. Either way, leaving behind
just the 5 and 6 versions is a bad idea.
Doug
___
freebsd-
mature software project.
OTOH, forcing users to jump through stupid hoops to change
configurations which have worked for over a decade is a sign of the
inmates running the asylum.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
safely depend on.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The problem is that the bash.1 and bashbugs.1 man pages do not get
compressed, and therefore the package fails. If I add a MAN1 variable to
the Makefile with those pages listed, it works.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Please fix this.
Thanks,
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
.bs
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/Zlib.bs
#
Here, the Zlib.bs file is found in
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/ but the build is trying
to find the Zlib.bs file at
lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/mach/auto/Compress/Raw/Zlib/
Is thi
For a small fee one can create an account at dropdav.com. Dropdav puts a
WebDav interface in front of Dropbox. My client of choice is www/cadaver. YMMV
--
Regards,
Doug
On Mar 5, 2013, at 13:41, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 5 March 2013, at 11:20, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
>
On 5 March 2013, at 11:20, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>> place. One was to eliminate multiple votes from the same IP I believe.
>>
>> Hrm. That sounds silly. The Dropbox voting actually encourages it's
>
> can anyone explain me what is so great in that software.
>
> got into webpage, and i
hout the maintainer noticing it.
Again, correct.
Excellent post, very well said on all points, I just picked particular
ones that I wanted to emphasize.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let w
On 10/06/2012 01:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Concerning the bpm, I have removed more old things and useless tests from it
> that I have added!
I haven't done a line by line count, but even if you're right, that
doesn't help when the code you add is so inefficient. For example, you
still haven'
On 10/06/2012 00:15, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Putting the WWW information into the port Makefile means that portindex
> only has to deal with about half as many files
I have the same response to you and Baptiste. I get what you're saying,
but what we gain by putting it in the Makefile does not make
On 6 October 2012, at 06:32, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 October 2012 01:01, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I just converted a port over to the new options structure and have a few
>> observations. I have not been involved in any of the discussions about the
>> structure as I di
I just converted a port over to the new options structure and have a few
observations. I have not been involved in any of the discussions about the
structure as I didn't have the time to get involved. However, a couple things
came to mind during the process:
1. The Port handbook is actually
, and for the already-stated reason that it
severely lowers the value of 'cat pkg-descr' (which I do quite often,
and I'm sure other users do as well) I think this is a bad idea.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
hth,
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/23/2012 14:36, Christopher Dawkins wrote:
> The advice in 20120908 seems irrelevant because I am not using
> pidgin-otr,
No, it's still relevant. The distinction is that if you were using
pidgin-otr, you have to delete it first before following the other
instructions.
> anyway, it cannot wo
On 09/17/2012 10:58, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Turns out that swt-devel compiles against the new xul, and davmail seems
> to be working fine with it.
I spoke to soon here. Davmail does indeed work, but with swt-devel
compiled against the new libxul I got a weird "echo" of the ic
On 09/12/2012 00:42, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 05:58 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>> Hello guys;
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> ...
>>>
>>> 2012/9/11 Doug Barton :
>>>> Now that we have a new version of lib
rsion upgrade. That's
why --list-origins does what it does, rather than just 'pkg_info -qoa'
David, if you are particularly concerned about having subversion
installed at an earlier point, you can include it in the list manually.
That won't hurt anything, portmaster will make sure th
On 9/12/2012 1:22 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:29:27 -1000
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> What we need to do is what I and others have been asking to do for
>> years. We need to designate a modern version of gcc (no less than 4.6)
>> as the official
On 9/12/2012 12:40 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 12/09/2012 kl. 11.29 skrev Doug Barton :
>
>> On 09/11/2012 02:52 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>>> So can we do a sweep on the ports tree and mark the 2232 ports
>>> with USE_GCC=4.2 until they can actually build wi
hundreds that fail on -current only. I try to
> advertise all these things the best I know how. Adding the hundreds that
> fail on -clang only and then blaming the maintainers is simply going to be
> counter-productive.
Write the day on your calendars folks, I completely agree with what Ma
he short term.)
Once that is done, the compiler in the base is an afterthought, and we
can do away with gcc in the base altogether much more easily. Users who
want to help support building ports with clang can continue to do so.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@fre
On 09/11/2012 05:58 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hello guys;
>
>
> - Original Message -
> ...
>>
>> 2012/9/11 Doug Barton :
>>> Now that we have a new version of libxul in the ports tree, any plans of
>>> upgrading swt to take advantage of
On 09/11/2012 02:27 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:54:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> As of last week, 4,680 ports out of 23,857 failed to build with clang on
>> 9-amd64. That's almost a 20% failure rate. Until we have better support
>> for either
Now that we have a new version of libxul in the ports tree, any plans of
upgrading swt to take advantage of it? I'd love to get the
vulnerabilities in the old version off of my daily periodic.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something.
you looked at the Porter's Handbook?
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook
Please pay special attention to the section on starting/stopping
services if you are going to be working on an rc.d script. Feel free to
send review requests to freebsd-rc@ if you need help.
D
uild correctly with
clang, and the issue of defining a "ports compiler" version of gcc (and
appropriate infrastructure) for those that can't. Once those issues are
resolved there would not be any further obstacles to moving the default.
Until they are, the change is premature.
D
I'm sorry, I can't make any sense of your message at all.
Can you show something along the lines of, "When I type X, Y happens"?
FWIW, there has been no change in portmaster's support of ccache.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, b
shot or updating a really ancient
>> one is slower than a normal "fetch" - beyond that portsnap is very fast.
>
> Agreed. After the first run of `portsnap fetch extract`, subsequent fetch and
> update using portsnap is certainly faster.
It depends on the volume of changes b
4, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 4:37:53 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>>> The problem is that we don't really support the idea of things in the
>>>>>> base magically deleting themselves.
>>>>>>
>>>&g
when you first open the file.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
1 - 100 of 1640 matches
Mail list logo
