Re: lang/gcc46

On 8/6/12, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/06/2012 00:30, b. f. wrote: >> On 8/6/12, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 07/31/2012 08:57, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Just to be clear, you compile stuff with gcc 4.6, that is

Re: lang/gcc46

On 8/6/12, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/31/2012 08:57, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > Just to be clear, you compile stuff with gcc 4.6, that is linked against > libgcc, and then you update to 4.7, with a new libgcc, and everything > still works? If so, that's g

Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE

> Hi johans at FreeBSD.org > & cc ports@ > A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on > cd print/texinfo ; make fetch > unless one imports newer values from current, ... > So how best to modify Makefile to not break on size & sha256 of > some but not all files ? > > The question can't be unique to this

Re: Where's linux-mirror.org coming from?

> In my port I have > > MASTER_SITES= NL:slatec,blas > > which, according to bsd.sites.mk, does not > include linux-mirror.org. In fact I can't > find it in bsd.sites.mk at all. > So where is it coming from? I recently removed it from the Netlib master sites because of recent failures, so you ne

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

On 6/11/12, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 6/10/12 11:14 PM, b. f. wrote: >> The distribution files are at: >> >> ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases >> >> and the homepage is: >> >> http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ >>

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote: > > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > >> Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has > >> not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. > >> > >> > >> (gpt32:

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 6/3/12, Erich wrote: ... > On 03 June 2012 PM 1:12:38 b. f. wrote: >> > On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote: >> > > On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote: ... >> With regard to your request for a versioned Ports trees -- well, we >> have ha

Re: Shared object "libpng.so.6"

On 6/3/12, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM, b. f. wrote: >>>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. >> >>> removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks >>> like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:42:55 Adam Strohl wrote: > > On 6/3/2012 17:24, Etienne Robillard wrote: > > I feel like this thread is grossly overstating how often ports are > > broken which is super rare in my experience. Proposing a version'd ports > > tree seems like a bad-practice-encouraging-solution

Re: portmaster -r png- Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection

> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libpng.so.6, needed by /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so, not > > found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by > > "libcairo.so.2" > > Command > > '['/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-intros

Re: Shared object "libpng.so.6"

>> Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. > removed manually, if portmaster hasn't already done so. Here it looks > like your new build of kde3libs is sloppily linking against the old > version of kde3libs that you still have installed, and which still Obviously I meant kdelibs3 in the above -- this i

Re: Shared object "libpng.so.6"

> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by > "libkdefx.so.6" > /usr/local/bin/moc ./domainbrowser.h -o domainbrowser.moc > gmake[2]: *** [settings.h] Fel 1 > gmake[2]: *** Inväntar oavslutade jobb... > gmake[2]: Lämnar katalogen > "/usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3/work/kdel

Re: Please rebuild all ports that depend on PNG

> > Realy no other possibility?! > > You need to rebuild all the ports that install binaries that link > against libpngNN.so.NN. That is actually a subset of the ports that > depend on graphics/png -- unfortunately it takes some effort to identify > precisely what does need rebuilding. There is t

Re: make failed for graphics/gdk-pixbuf2

Leslie Jensen wrote: ... > ImportError: > /usr/local/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.so: Undef > ined symbol "PyUnicodeUCS4_AsUTF8String" > gmake[4]: *** [GdkPixbuf-2.0.gir] Fel 1 > gmake[4]: Lämnar katalogen It's difficult to determine the source of the problem without more info

graphics/djvulibre

Are there many users of the QT3 djvulibre GUI in ports/graphics/djvulibre who would have difficulties switching to one of the other GUIs? The upstream developers have removed it from the latest versions of the djvulibre distribution, and I am wondering whether it is worth some special effort to re

Re: checksum mismatch in print/texinfo

> > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Henry Miller wrote: > > > > > subject says it all, I'm trying to update texinfo, and getting a checksum > > mismatch. I deleted the distfiles in questions, so I'm not sure what else > > to > > try. > > > > shairia# uname -a > > FreeBSD shairia.millerfarm.com

Re: BUILD_DEPENDS= RUN_DEPENDS=

> Hi, > > I was trying to append to these in my /etc/make.conf and found that a > large (thousands) number of ports are using = instead of +=, thus > destroying any user-supplied depends. > > The use case for wanting to do this is to force devel/ccache to be a > build dependency on all ports, for p

Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake.

On 3/16/12, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:49 AM, b. f. wrote: >> Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> >> Figured out. Ad

Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake.

Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a > >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my > >> make.conf: > >>

Re: graphics/png does not build with lang/gcc

On 3/8/12, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thursday 08 March 2012 11:10:42 Gautam wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gautam wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:41 PM, b. f. wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Gautam wrote: >>>>> Shoul

Re: graphics/png does not build with lang/gcc

On 3/8/12, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:11:52PM +0000, b. f. wrote: >> The custom gcc article that you are attempting to use was written at >> a time when some of the related port Makefiles had some shortcomings >> that no longer exist, and is not the r

Re: graphics/png does not build with lang/gcc

On 3/7/12, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/03/2012 14:11 b. f. said the following: >> you can just >> install lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 and set USE_GCC=4.6 in your build >> environment, an included Makefile, or on the command line > > BTW, our traditional taxonomy seems to

Re: graphics/png does not build with lang/gcc

> Adding dinoex (Maintainer of graphics/png). > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Gautam wrote: > > > > > > >> Still didnt work for me -- did another buildworld and retried to check if > > there was something else messed up. > > > > I am moving back to base gcc for now. Waiting for redports lang/

Re: Error in INDEX file

"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > While investigating the cause of sudden crashes this morning in > mkreadmes, I discovered that my INDEX-10 file has the following as its > first line: > > make: don't know how to make describe(continuing)|| ports/Tools/scripts/domakedescribe and some of the

Re: lang/gcc rumdependencies?

>The main question is why this port (and everythin else with >USE_GCC=4.6+) depend on lang/gcc46 and not lang/gcc. Most port users >dislike building latest gcc snapshot on a weekly basis. Indeed. But (as discussed before on this list), they don't have to, if they find this to be a problem: they c

Re: math/R vs. devel/pcre

> I had a problem rebuilding math/R this morning after updating > devel/pcre; I'm wondering if there's something obvious (to folks > other than me) that I did incorrectly. ... >gcc46 -std=gnu99 -export-dynamic -fopenmp -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 -o >R.bin > Rmain.o -L../../lib -lR -lRblas >

Re: Please test your commits

> On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following: > >>> On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> > Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely

Re: USE_GCC and CC=clang

> I'm trying to fix a port which absolutely will not build with clang, > since clang does not support the gcc extension used by this port. I set > USE_GCC=4.2+, which is the lowest version of GCC which will work, but it > doesn't properly override CC=clang. > > wxs at ack spamdyke % env CC=clang ma

Re: [PATCH] lang/gcc -- Fix build on freebsd-current

> > Actually you can add a dot (.) to these matches, e.g. freebsd[123]* -> > > freebsd[123].*, etc... Have you contacted the maintainer > > (gerald at FreeBSD.org) by the way? > > My guess? We should rip out the [123] and [23] strings entirely. If > anyone is running ports on FreeBSD 1, they hav

Re: Building ports with gcc46

On 12/15/11, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:05, b. f. wrote: >> If you are interested in applying them to a single port, use a test on >> .CURDIR, >> or, better yet, add the statement to any of the optional Makefiles that >> are >> automati

Re: Building ports with gcc46

> > Is there a way to build devel/protobuf with gcc46? Unfortunately I see > > a compatibility issue where the software I'm linking against it > > crashes because of the conflicting stdc++ librray versions. I've tried > > setting CC, CXX, LDFLAGS but I seem to be missing something else? > > > > Tha

Re: ports: clang: error: unsupported option '-dumpspecs'

> > -dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt > > use > > specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and > > this should be fixed in a clean way. > > > > Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec | grep something with a saner check. > >

Re: lang/gcc46

> > We have lang/gcc already. This port is created for perferred gcc releases > > (4.6.2 currently). What we're waiting for is a bsd.gcc.mk update to allow > > users build ports with lang/gcc instead of lang/gcc46. > > Ahh. I see the issue. I have not looked at bsd.gcc.mk, but it does not > seem li

Re: altivec for boinc-setiathome-enhanced on powerpc?

> despite the --disable-altivec configure option in the Makefile of > astro/boinc-setiathome-ennhanced (which should be removed because it is > autodetected), it is enabled automatically for PowerPC but there it > fails with cc1plus not recognizing the -faltivec option: > > http://pointyhat.freebsd

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports (general)

On 11/3/11, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 11/03/11 18:42, schrieb b. f.: >So I presume the WITH_FBSD10_FIX flag is set in /etc/make.conf, right? You can set it in a number of local Makefiles that are automatically included during a port build. That includes make.conf, and the others mentio

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports (general)

> > > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure > > > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or should not build > > > shared libs; the problem is that the OS is detected now as > > > > As a temporary workaround, add "WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1" to /etc/make.conf. > > port

Re: textproc/libxml2 does not install libxml2.so.5

> > This doesn't seem to do the trick for me: > > # echo $SHELL > /bin/csh > # setenv UNAME_r 9.9-CURRENT > # echo $UNAME_r > 9.9-CURRENT > # cd /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2 > # make install clean > [...] > # pkg_info -g libxml2-2.7.8_1 > Information for libxml2-2.7.8_1: > > Mismatched Checksums: >

Re: textproc/libxml2 does not install libxml2.so.5

>> Mismatched Checksums: >> pkg_info: /usr/local/etc/xml2Conf.sh doesn't exist >> pkg_info: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 doesn't exist >> pkg_info: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc doesn't exist >> >> >> Hints and/or pointers welcome. >It works for me correctly > >http://tb.smeets.im/tb/in

Re: math/atlas not detected in many ports

> The situation with $subj: many ports' Makefiles are trying to detect if > math/atlas is to be used by looking for ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libatlas_r.so. > Since last update math/atlas does not build the lib*_r.so* and so none of > those ports could see and use atlas. The Makefiles affected: > /usr/ports

Re: pkg_version: corrupted record (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring

Jerry wrote: > After attempting unsuccessfully to update KDE4 via "portmaster", I > found a number of errors printed out when using "pkg_version-vIL=". > > I eventually used "portmanager" to update the KDE4 port successfully; > however, I am still receiving the following error messages. > > These p

audio/cdparanoia broken on -CURRENT, and probably on 9.0

Just a note to say that recent changes on -CURRENT (r225950, meaning that it is probably broken on 9.0 after r226067) have broken audio/cdparanoia, and it should be fixed or marked as BROKEN there. I haven't filed a PR, or attempted to patch it yet -- I think that it would be worthwhile to look in

Re: "math/fftw3" port broken

On 9/26/11, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 09/25/2011 08:19 PM, Jerry wrote: >> When attempting to build the "math/fftw3" port, the following error >> message is immediately displayed and the build halted: >> >> Variable CFLAGS is recursive. ... > I am unable to reproduce this problem.

Re: Substitute dependencies?

>I s there any way to substitute dependencies, in cases where the substitute >would work as well or better? As some of the others wrote, it depends on the ports involved. Some ports that are supposed to provide the same functionality have subtle differences that can cause problems. > > First ca

Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?

... > > There are several ways to break the circular dependancy: > > > 1. Turn the DOC option OFF for audio/jack. > > 2. define NOPORTDOCS when installing devel/doxygen (breaks dependancy > > on graphics/graphviz) Turning the DOC option off, and setting NOPORTDOCS are the same for audio/jack. ...

Re: Ports with CPPFLAGS in CONFIGURE_(ARGS|ENV)

> > > Do you mean one gigantic, monolithic patch that would amend all of > > > them, or a large set of individual patches (last I checked, there > > > were ~1453 ports in need of this sort of revision)?  I could go > > > either way, just need to know which would be preferred. > > > > One monolithi

Re: Detecting dependencies

> On 09/15/11 07:06, chukharev at mail.ru wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There have been a discussion about finding interdependencies of ports. > > I have a relatively simple Python script for that. There is a pr > > ports/160007 > > to add its early version. Unfortunately, I missed a reply to it, so > > t

Re: Building caire and $PATH order

> A couple of weeks ago, after installing openssl from ports, I changed > PATH order in my .bash_login, in order to use /usr/local before /usr an > so on. > > Today, I upgraded icu, and its dependants, including cairo. The build > was successful until reaching cairo : > > --

Re: USE_GCC and unnesessary RUN_DENEDS on gcc port (Was: Print +REQUIRED_BY as tree?)

> > For example, x264 DEPENDS on gcc, (has USE_GCC=4.4+ in Makefile), > > but no x264 files are linked with libgcc_s.so or other libraries from > > gcc44. It seems, that we need separate USE_GCC_BUILD and USE_GCC_RUN, > > as with PERL or PYTHON. > Or, maybe automate this, as now port system w

Re: devel/git new update des not fetch

> > Since my new update of ports tree : > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===> Found saved configuration for git-1.7.4.3 > => git-1.7.6.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting

Re: [RFC] New ports idea: github / gitorious / bitbucket direct support.

> > ... gzip, for example, has "timestamp" field in header. > > Try this locally, without any [D]VCS: > > > > % mkdir test && echo "one" > test/one.txt && echo "two" > test/two.txt > > % tar czf test1.tar.gz test && sleep 5 && tar czf test2.tar.gz test > > % md5 test1.tar.gz test2.tar.gz > > MD5

git distfiles on the local mirror

Could someone please place the latest devel/git distfiles on the local mirrors, so that they are available while kernel.org is recovering from being hacked? The github mirror only has gzipped development tarballs, that don't work with the current ports Makefile. b. ___

Re: PREFIX is not honored for dependencies

>Yes you are right gperf and vigra-config dependencies are wrong in that >case. > >I didn't see it because it is fixed in the short coming 3.4.2. > >I'm focus on it sorry It is just a minor detail that I mentioned in passing, perhaps something the maintainers could adjust together with their next

Re: PREFIX is not honored for dependencies

> There is nothing to fix, this is the way ports are expected to work. > > Are you sure? IMHO if PREFIX is defined before installing any port > and never gets changed than all ports should respect PREFIX. > > > Playing with PREFIX != LOCALBASE has to be done with care because it > > can lead to som

Re: ghostscript8 vs. ghostscrip9 conflict during portupgrade

> Seems like some ports depend on ghostscript8 whereas other depend on > ghostscript9. Unfortunately both ghostscript variants can't coexist on > the same system. To be specific: > > I've got ghostscript8 installed (ghostscript8-8.71_8) which is > required by a bunch of ports as per "pkg_info -Rx g

Re: portupgrades fail because of missing /usr/local/lib/liblzma.la

> On my 8.2-System (amd64, kernel & system updated two days ago) I run > into a nasty problem updating my ports: > > Ports that depend on "liblzma" fail to build with the following error: > > "/usr/local/lib/liblzma.la: No such file or directory" > > AFAIK, the xz-libraries are not part of the base

Re: devel/icu... help... ?

> Thanks for the quick reply and I certainly appreciate your viewpoint. > > Are these undefined references defined by FREEBSD? If so, why would you > introduce an OS dependency in a library intended to provide unicode support? > It is difficult to say, from the limited information, whether the fai

Re: Problem building math/R: texi2dvi needed but missing on your system

> I'm trying to build math/R. Compilation went fine, but when I try to > 'make install' I get the following error: > > > ERROR: 'texi2dvi' needed but missing on your system. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/R/work/R-2.13.1/doc/manual. > > *** Error code 1 (ignored) > > cd: can't

Re: porter handbook MASTER_SITES section outdated?

> In sec 5.4.2 MASTER_SITES in the porter handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#AEN1512 > > the example given is: > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} > > However, sunpoet@ has just committed my patch > changing my ${IGNORE_MAS

Re: Any software tools known for XBRL & PDF V1.6 & 1.7 ?

On 7/2/11, b. f. wrote: ved PDF 1.6 & 1.7 files from companieshouse.gov.uk (that I >> suppose relate to, or contain XBRL), that contain financial data >> I'm supposed to edit & return. ... >> The only tool I know to do that is, a free download of latest binary >

Re: Any software tools known for XBRL & PDF V1.6 & 1.7 ?

> Anyone know of public domain source that does XBRL format (&/or iXBRL) ? > & PDF V1.6 & 1.7 ? XBRL: http://arelle.org (python-based) http://www.xbrlapi.org/ (java-based) http://code.google.com/p/xbrlware/ (community edition; ruby-based) http://sourceforge.net/projects/inlinexbrl/ > I received

Re: [Adopting a port..or contributing... and a patch included for java on most recent of all jdk/jre)

> Am 30.06.2011 04:23, schrieb xD 0x41: > *For your next submission*, please keep the information below in mind so > we can actually use your contribution: > > In a common work flow, you'd usually first update the ports tree (for > instance, running "portsnap fetch update", or for the first time,

Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports

Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:21:26PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > A permanent URL to this run is: > > > > > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110616185105/ > > > > That will stick around even if we use amd64-9-exp for something else. > > I

Re: GHC Port on 9-CURRENT

>In any case, the port builds fine with GCC. Perhaps it would be prudent >to set CC=gcc and CXX=g++ in the makefile for the time being and mark >the port as working again? Please don't hardcode the compilers: users may be using other compilers, or may still wish to experiment with clang, without

Re: libtool issues

> On 06/20/2011 04:16 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:03:01AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> I am maintainer of the science/vis5d+ port. It doesn't build on the > >> i386 with FreeBSD-8.0-RELEASE, as is shown here: > >> > >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/error

Re: PR ports/155331

> Some time ago (actually, it has been the beginning of March), I > submitted a proposition to include Emacs Speaks Statistics (ESS) > (http://ess.r-project.org/), which is an interface to the > language/statistics package R into ports. I have also included a > probably erroneous patch (was my firs

Re: 2nd deprecation campaign

On 6/17/11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > 2011/6/16 b. f. : >> bapt wrote: >>>I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports >>>where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors >>>doesn't count except if they are the up

Re: 2nd deprecation campaign

bapt wrote: >I am in the middle of a new deprecation campaign, to remove ports >where no more distfiles are publicly available (no other OS mirrors >doesn't count except if they are the upstream of course). > >Maybe some will be false positive (I will try to not have too much of them). Could you p

Re: Does USE_GCC= 4.5+ also set C++ and Fortran to g++45/46 and gfortran45/46?

On 4/14/11, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 04/14/11 08:32, b. f. wrote: >> On 4/14/11, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> On 04/13/11 20:59, b. f. wrote: > We had hope for clang, but clang lacks in many aspects we desperately > need - like OpenMP support. That may change, i

Re: Does USE_GCC= 4.5+ also set C++ and Fortran to g++45/46 and gfortran45/46?

On 4/14/11, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 04/13/11 20:59, b. f. wrote: > I looked into ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk and found that only gcc45 is set in > case of using USE_FORTRAN, not gcc46. It would be nice also having gcc46 > set, since we try to optimise for AVX in the new Intel Sandy-Bridg

Re: Does USE_GCC= 4.5+ also set C++ and Fortran to g++45/46 and gfortran45/46?

> Using a self brewn port of a scientific software package which is > intended to use gcc 4.5 or higher, I use "USE_GCC= 4.5+" in the top > level Makefile. But I get an error when starting the application: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11 > required by /usr/

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

> Hi, > > I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper I'm glad to see that you're helping to clean up. > > One of the features that has given us the most trouble has been > the options framework for ports. We automatically test ports using the > default options, b

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

Matthias Andree wrote: ... > >> Is there a way to get portmaster to behave like portupgrade did and > >> only upgrade what needs to be upgraded? > >> > > > > This is documented in the portmaster(1) manpage. You can use -a to > > update all ports that need to be updated. To update a subset of

Re: Updating multiple ports with portmaster

> I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple > ports and how to correctly use wildcards. > > For example, I have this from pkg_version: > > p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61) > p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38 < needs updating

Re: deprecated ports

On 3/16/11, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:15:11AM +0000, b. f. wrote: >> But it's not clear to me why, for example, some usable fonts were >> deprecated -- fonts often don't have homepages. > > The deprecations are (currently) advisory-only. >

Re: deprecated ports

> That said, I think that un-deprecating these ports just because someone > can find a distfile somewhere is the wrong approach. bapt has been very > careful to only deprecate ports that are on the absolute bottom of the > pile. They are unmaintained, and unfetchable. That's not completely accurat

Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82

On 3/13/11, Ade Lovett wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:22 , b. f. wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> There are way too many things happening "in private" around here and >>>> the only way to solve

Re: [HEADS UP] GNU make 3.82

>On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> There are way too many things happening "in private" around here and >> the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors. > >Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way about? We need not look any farth

Re: science/libctl marked as BROKEN, but does build on 8.2-STABLE amd64

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:59:02AM +, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote: > > Can anyone shed more light on why this port is marked BROKEN? ... > > libtool: link: cc -shared .libs/ctl.o .libs/subplex.o .libs/ctl-f77-glue.o > .libs/integrator.o .libs/cintegrator.o -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib > -Wl

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

>portmaster -L --index-only 0.76s user 1.65s system 6% cpu 38.871 total > >So it takes 38s on a *very small* installation. My experience is that >all FreeBSD ports tools are incredibly slow, be it portupgrade, >portmaster, even the basic tools like pkg_version. Maybe it would help >to recognize th

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> >>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? > >> > >>And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and > >>portupgrade -r python? ... > can you tell me if libreoffice is in the list to recompile? I don't know, I don't have it on my machine. If you do, the

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 3/6/11, Grzegorz Blach wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/06/2011 18:35, b. f. wrote: ... >>> First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. ... > Multiple trees don't help me a lot, portmaster became fools. > There

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

On 3/6/11, b. f. wrote: ... >> First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. ... >> Another possibility is replace ports in disk, but after upgrade tree eg. >> with portsnap I lose my changes, and portmaster want to rebuild these >> ports to stable release.

Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!

> I read last post Martin Wilke's blog called "FreeBSD needs fresh Blood!" > > First of all, I think it's difficult to testing ports. > > I'm using testing release of VirtualBox, > but for build this port I must download patches, > apply its on my own tree and merge its with official ports > using

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 06.03.2011 09:09 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: >> On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: >>> On 06.03.2011 00:56 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: > > Now it is more clear to me that this upgrading process depends from the > specific installation. Perhap

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 3/6/11, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 06.03.2011 00:56 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: >>>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? >>> >>> And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and >>> portupgrade -r python? >> >> As I explai

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

On 3/5/11, b. f. wrote: >>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? >> >>And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and >>portupgrade -r python? > > As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, unlike 'portupgrade -r > python', the up

Re: [FYI] Fwd: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk

>> Does it rebuild all depending packages? > >And waht is the difference between make upgrade-site-packages and >portupgrade -r python? As I explained earlier on freebsd-python@, unlike 'portupgrade -r python', the upgrade-site-packages target just rebuilds ports that have files in the library dir

Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

On 3/1/11, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> b. f. wrote: >>>>> On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: ... >>> >>> As is clear from bsd.gcc.mk, in almost every case now in use, >>>

Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

> > On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied > >> below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now. > >> > >> The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is > >> include

Re: ath9k driver

>I am looking for the FreeBSD equivalent of the ath9k driver that comes with >Linux. >Can't find it between the ports on you're website and Google gives (as >results) plenty of people looking for the same thing I am, just no >(definitive) answer. >Do you happen to know if this driver has been por

Re: FreeBSD Port: ppl-0.10.2_1

> Dear Sir(s) > >I am having trouble using your ppl package. I keep getting errors > about undefined references, in the ppl libraries, concerning basic >C++ input and output streams. Does a patch need to be applied, > perhaps? Could the install not have been done correctly?

Re: [HEADS UP] Python Infrastructure changes Roadmap

>On that note out of every python app that I use there has only been one >problem not really vital (ports/devel/py-psyco) does not seem to build >against 2.7 and I assume that would be the same for ( > 2.7 ) >From the psyco homepage: "16 July 2010 Python 2.7 is unsupported so far. Anyone interes

Re: How to not use OPTIMIZED_FLAGS properly

On 2/7/11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: ... > Yes. I get it wrong what Konstantin and portlint are said. Sorry. > CFLAGS=-O0 out of CONFIGURE_ENV works just fine. Thanks. Note that CFLAGS=-O0 is (even) more restrictive than CFLAGS+=-O0 -- the latter just overrides the -On setting for n > 0, while t

Re: How to not use OPTIMIZED_FLAGS properly

> 07.02.2011 20:50, Konstantin Tokarev пишет: > > > > > > 07.02.2011, 20:34, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov": > >> Hello. > >> > >> I'm working on port that doesn't builds with "-O2 -pipe", that passed to > >> Makefile by default (it exits with message about virtual memory is > >> exhausted). I can avoi

Re: What ports require this port?

On 2/6/11, Dan Langille wrote: > On 2/6/2011 9:03 PM, b. f. wrote: >> On 2/6/11, b. f. wrote: > > While we're here... is there anything special about PATCH_DEPENDS, > FETCH_DEPENDS, and EXTRACT_DEPENDS that might be different than the > depends I'm already proces

Re: What ports require this port?

On 2/6/11, b. f. wrote: >> Over the weekend, a new feature was added to FreshPorts BETA. A port >> now lists all ports that require it. This code will eventually move to >> production after it's been running on on the beta site for a while. >> >> Notes: >&

Re: What ports require this port?

> Over the weekend, a new feature was added to FreshPorts BETA. A port > now lists all ports that require it. This code will eventually move to > production after it's been running on on the beta site for a while. > > Notes: > > * The code uses the output of make -V RUN_DEPENDS -V LIB_DEPENDS -V

Re: policy on having the same routines in different library archives?

> I can see benefits and disadvantages of having same > routines in different libraries. Advantages are > that a user can choose to only install Slatec, > with no Blas, and that no fine tuning of the > distribution is required. > Disadvantages could be extra size and potential > for confusion, e.g.

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

> > Protect your ports tree > > $> cd /usr/ > > $> mv ports ports_save && mkdir ports && > > portsnap extract > > > > > > This way you have your old and a fresh ports tree > > available. > > Portsnap checks the file ports/.portsnap.INDEX to see > > which > > ports have updates without this file por

Re: ports-mgmt/portconf , ports-mgmt/portmaster and make args

On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/01/2011 11:44, b. f. wrote: >> On 1/1/11, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 12/31/2010 18:40, b. f. wrote: ... >> and that >> NO_PACKAGE may preclude your use of 'make package' with -g in >> portmaster (at le

  1   2   >