linux_base-c6: /etc/mtab is not a symlink

2014-12-25 Thread arrowdodger
Hello, i've found that /compat/linux/etc/mtab file installed by linux_base-c6 port is a regular file and it's always empty. Is there any reason not to make it a symbolic link to /compat/linux/proc/mounts? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://

Re: FreeBSD Port: owncloud-csync-0.91.4_1

2014-10-23 Thread arrowdodger
> > Do you have > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Dierking. > > > > Some output to gander thru : > > > > root@bsdvmtest:/usr/ports/net/owncloud-csync # more Makefile > > # Created by: arrowdodger <6year...@gmail.com> > > # $FreeBSD: head/ne

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/tortoisehg - is not compatible with Mercurial version 3.1

2014-09-24 Thread arrowdodger
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > arrowdodger wrote, On 09/21/2014 11:34: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> I tried to install Tortois

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/tortoisehg - is not compatible with Mercurial version 3.1

2014-09-21 Thread arrowdodger
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > Hi, > I tried to install TortoiseHG on FreeBSD 10 (PC-BSD), but it doesn't work, > because it is not compatible with Mercurial 3.1.1 (version in ports tree). > > It just shows this error: > > Bug Report from TortoiseHG f

Re: What's up with pkg-fallout?

2014-03-12 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen < step...@missouri.edu> wrote: > I keep getting emails from pkg-fallout@ that some of my ports are > faulty. But it is obvious that pkg-fallout sometimes uses a really old > ports trees. And the errors it is reporting have been fixed wee

Re: Lessons learned from source upgrade from FreeBSD i386 9.2 Stable to FreeBSD i386 10.0 Release.

2014-01-29 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Robert_Burmeister < robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu> wrote: > Lessons learned from source upgrade from FreeBSD i386 9.2 Stable to FreeBSD > i386 10.0 Release. > > A) > Clang does not need to to be installed first. > > > > B) > > FreeBSD 10's change to pkg(8) (a.k.a.

Re: FreeBSD Port: enlightenment-0.17.5,2

2013-12-24 Thread arrowdodger
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Peter wrote: > Hello, > > I'm testing E17 under the PCBSD10 (based on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3) on my > laptop. > I'm really disappointed by the degradation of some modules (I'm comparing > with 0.16.999.65643 I use on my workstation, under PCBSD 9.1). > I would like to

Re: net-mgmt/aircrack-ng on FreeBSD 7+ / call for testing

2011-10-02 Thread arrowdodger
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > Hi ports, > > Since some (2 years?) time, injection > is not supported in monitor mode, but > should work in ahdemo. > > aircrack-ng did not reflect this > change, and was basically not working > as intended. > > I filled a pr, since working on

Re: More trouble with wine: won't build for amd64

2011-10-02 Thread arrowdodger
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Now I find I can't build emulators/wine on my new computer because wine is > for i386 only. > > Any way I can get an i386 compatibility mode? > > I could try, perhaps when FreeBSD 9.0 is released, installing and building > ports on a 16 GB US

Re: How to escalate? ports/159276 - cmake

2011-08-27 Thread arrowdodger
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Igor Soumenkov <2igo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > How can I escalate the issue related to one of the ports? > Cmake in ports sets different cflags than the original one. It seems > that the comitter who introduced this problem with a patch > ( > http://www

Re: net-snmp 5.7

2011-07-29 Thread arrowdodger
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 AM, ajtiM wrote: > Today I updtaed net-snmp from the version fro subject and I t srew my > printing. I have hplip install and printing throug jet port. I tried to > reinstall hplip but it need it netsnmp.20 > > > depends on shared library: netsnmp.20 - not found.

Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO?

2011-04-27 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:05 AM, John Marino wrote: > Several days ago, I submitted a patch for a port I maintain: > ports/156541 "[MAINTAINER] Upgrade lang/gnat-aux to release version and > add C++" > > Nobody has touched it, but many other PRs after that submission have been > assigned, et

Re: [CFT] FreeBSD Haskell ports update.

2011-04-03 Thread arrowdodger
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is the call for testing for FreeBSD Haskell ports update which is > planned > to land up in the official ports tree in few weeks. > At last! Thank you for your work! ___ free

Re: Re: [mdb-dev] databases/mbdtools + unixODBC

2011-03-21 Thread arrowdodger
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Dale Scott wrote: > 1. INSTALL says acinclude.m4 must be deleted when using libtool 1.3.4+. I > have libtool 2.2.6b, did not delete acinclude.m4, and did not get an error. > Is this correct? > No idea, i'm not familiar with autotools stuff. 2. configure reports

Re: [mdb-dev] databases/mbdtools + unixODBC

2011-03-21 Thread arrowdodger
GNU make is `gmake` on FreeBSD. Try to use this command instead `make`. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Generate plist from install_manifest.txt when port uses CMake?

2011-03-14 Thread arrowdodger
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Either way, using install_manifest.txt even as a hint does sounds useful > to me too. > What i am proposing is using manifest to generate plist when _user_ installs a port. Not when porter writes a port, because porter surely can wri

Re: Generate plist from install_manifest.txt when port uses CMake?

2011-03-13 Thread arrowdodger
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Nope, I mean if the plist is completely automatically generated, how are > you going to add commands to it, such as "@dirrm" or any other? In the > Makefile? > Are they actually needed? I can't come up with example when i need to put

Re: Generate plist from install_manifest.txt when port uses CMake?

2011-03-13 Thread arrowdodger
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > How would it interact with other "features" a plist might have, such as > @dirrm or @dirrmtry and other commands? > I'm not sure, if i get your question right. You are asking how we can distinguish which dirs should be @dirrm'd and w

Generate plist from install_manifest.txt when port uses CMake?

2011-03-13 Thread arrowdodger
Hello. Suppose we have a port, which uses CMake as build system and contains following code: include(FindFoo) if(Foo_FOUND) add_library(FooPlugin ...) install(FooPlugin) else() message(STATUS "Foo not found, plugin will not be built.") endif() If user already has foo port installed, then t

Request for ports review.

2011-02-23 Thread arrowdodger
Hello, ports@. I've prepared an update for ANTLR-related ports and want for someone's comments on my work, before i create PR. Current version of devel/antlr port is 2.7.7, it's latest version from v2 branch. I've updated this port to latest 3.3 version, which also contains 2.7.7 for backwards com

Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-10 Thread arrowdodger
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0300, arrowdodger wrote: > > I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject > by > > USE_GNOME variable. > > But if i run pkg_inf

Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-10 Thread arrowdodger
I've updated port. The only thing left - setting dependency on py-gobject by USE_GNOME variable. But if i run pkg_info -f on installed port, i see: > Dependency: py26-gobject-2.26.0 > dependency origin: devel/py-gobject > So, maybe this dependency is implicit and i should not care? Update

Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-09 Thread arrowdodger
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Sunpoet Hsieh wrote: > It looks like you'll have two ports, version 1 and 2, and these two > ports do not conflict with each other. > IMHO, I would simply use devel/tortoisehg1 for version 1 and > devel/tortoisehg for upcoming version 2. > You do not need to add -g

Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-09 Thread arrowdodger
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Sunpoet Hsieh wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, I suggest to set PORTNAME=tortoisehg > If you do want to add -hgtk suffix, you may set PKGNAMESUFFIX=-hgtk > instead. > It makes portlint happier. > It also simplifies Makefile since DISTNAME is already the default value

Re: Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-08 Thread arrowdodger
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > It shouldn't be listed in pkg-plist, because it will be removed > automatically on port deinstall. Well, if i 'make PREFIX=/home/arr/prefix install && make PREFIX=/home/arr/prefix deinstall' then this file is not deleted. You mean, it w

Request for new port review: TortoiseHG.

2011-02-08 Thread arrowdodger
Hello. I've made a port for TortoiseHG (in fact, for its hgtk script). It is my first attempt in port creation, so i want someone to review it. The current problems are following: 1. The user can choose to not install nautilus extension and translation files (if defined(WITHOUT_NLS)). To prevent s

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-01-30 Thread arrowdodger
I've run same issue with making lingucomponent. Besides that, i've seen following errors during build: usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomphelp4gcc3.so, needed by ../../ unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) ../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so: undefined reference to `base

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-01-30 Thread arrowdodger
I've run same issue with making lingucomponent. Besides that, i've seen following errors during build: usr/bin/ld: warning: libcomphelp4gcc3.so, needed by ../../ unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) ../../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libtlfx.so: undefined reference to `base