On 18-5-2021 03:56, Chris wrote:
On 2021-05-17 18:17, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Chris wrote:
On 2021-05-17 16:30, Jan Beich wrote:
> Chris writes:
>
>> I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages
>> ( dev-commits-ports-all )
>> but only receive messages that affect me -- the
>> ports I currentl
On 18-4-2021 16:51, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
On Sunday, 18 April 2021 14:00:01 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org
wrote:
So perhaps that is the best way to avoid having to deal with ABI/API
breakage...
After that it is up to the maintainers of the dependant packages to
update their package an
On 17-4-2021 13:09, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 6:58 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project.
Which is of course a pity.
Are there any plans to also get Boost 1.75 in ports?
There is this one PR which touches the topic:
ht
On 17-4-2021 14:16, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Getting the port to build is one thing.
Right that is probably not very complicated.
But the API/ABI changes are indeed a pain.
Reason for all kinds of trouble with Ceph as well.
There used to be several versions of Boost in parallel.
Yes. I have no idea
On 17-4-2021 13:09, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 6:58 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project.
Which is of course a pity.
Are there any plans to also get Boost 1.75 in ports?
There is this one PR which touches the topic:
Hi,
Ceph has moved to Boost 1.75, so now it is build with the project.
Which is of course a pity.
Are there any plans to also get Boost 1.75 in ports?
--WjW
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
