e.org/
It'd be very helpful if bug reports would be filed on FreeBSD's bugzilla
(https://bugs.freebsd.org) tagged with keyword "security" if any
undocumented vulns (not submitted to VuXML) are found.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@fre
an based distros.
Honest question, I really am interested.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2017-11-14 18:41, Vlad K. wrote:
List,
before 3.2.0 Poudriere defined PORT_DBDIR with only
--options, which was apparently a bug. Now (in
3.2.0) it honors -p option in the options command and includes ports
tree name (given to -p) in PORT_DBDIR.
I forgot to mention, this is the relevant
ge. Thought it was important enough to mention
it, so here.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
udriere is perfectly capable to manage software on a single
machine. It works out of the box with a few simple steps needed to set
it up for that task (poudriere jail + poudriere ports).
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
ports framework target works? Poudriere is really using
the ports make targets here.
Do synth or portmaster do it differently?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, sen
d if you re-run this step after each 'ports -u' and before 'bulk',
it will raise dialogs for ports that have options changed.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
ext bulk run it will simply rebuild what's
missing.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
o, if those are
needed as (build) dependencies.
Unless of course it grew this ability recently and I'm gravely mistaken,
but I don't know of such addition.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/m
ories that
differ in supported arch, abi, options used, packages listed, ...
--
Vlad K.
Acheron Media, Croatia
www.acheronmedia.hr
+385 95 536 3850
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To uns
ted builds).
I'll also second the opinion -- if you're building from ports on a
machine anyway, poudriere does not in any way require any more resources
except to store produced packages and ccache files, which is not much.
--
Vlad K.
___
oudriere's bulk output is the best list to check what you
might want to restart, IMHO.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
and should therefore be restarted. That at least is how we do it for our
servers.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
Eg. Libre/Open SSL upgrades, restart
all services that depend on it?
Meanwhile, there's "lsop":
https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/lsop/
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
ining it. I've seen that cause breakages,
because the committer doing the change does not understand the port, and
am vehemently against it.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
w features (that may break things) with fixes, when they release a new
version.
Either that, or you simply bump the version and get both the fixes AND
new features but that's what's being done with QUARTERLY now, and
we're back to square one.
--
Vlad K.
_
ginal post could've been avoided if the user
only read UPDATING which clearly stated that www/node becomes 7 and
previous node (6) becomes www/node6. (20161207) entry.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.o
table versions kept longer around
(ala Gentoo), is the best way to solve the problem with ports without
introducing extra manpower and the need to backport.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
wiki page, but I guess we can cross that bridge when we get to it :)
I'm not that familiar with moinmoin, maybe there's a way to specify
aliases or something.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.or
l the important info there, which can then be expanded by
anyone.
Just thinking out loud here.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2017-01-03 19:55, Mark Linimon wrote:
The wiki doesn't have much of a "structure" right now. I did some
prototype
pages for a restructuring but it got bogged down due to internal
politics.
I wanna hear all about it and see what you got, merge with my ide
ll over the place and not nicely organized.
Perhaps it is time we start a special Ports namespace that would allow
us to collate and list in one place all the user submitted wisdom and
important instructions?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
is not the best place for
regular usage tips). Aside from UPDATING of course, which is just
supposed to be important notes about one-time updates/upgrades.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
th
something like this it should be possible to add an ability for
Poudriere (and Synth?) to track multiple patches for multiple sets
without the need to "pollute" the ports tree. Why? A/B testing,
different arches - different patches, etc
So here: YES PLEASE.
Julian, did you p
cally generated but a human has to review and
commit
b.2) the testing infrastructure autocommits (I'm sure portmgr would
object to this)
b.3) we create a new "stability" database like vuxml which these
automated tests can automatically po
by other users.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
fixing these problems.
Probably not. I've already posted about issues with head/quarterly,
hoping for a discussion, never happened. Others have complained about
the same problem, but no constructive discussion ensued. Is my
frustration coming through, yet? :)
--
Vlad K.
of stable ports. And IMHO we only need to balance between
how stable we can provide/guarantee it and what resources and manpower
we have available to do so.
What are the community's thoughts on this?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
On 2016-11-02 18:03, The Doctor wrote:
I see we are having issues with dovecot 2.226.0 in the FreeBSD world.
What issues?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
racle JRE ports
that require you to manually download the distfiles and agree to
Oracle's license apriori.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any ma
eature! The "racial" ones can be
patched out with INSULTS_CONFIGURE_ON+= --with-pc-insults, if anyone
really WAS thinking about bringing a banhammer to that option...)
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fr
ncluded in
whatever role. Eg, all include/... files be switched with HEADERS
option. Many ports already do DOCS, MANPAGES, EXAMPLES. So that's a set
criteria one can base -runtime variant upon:
OPTIONS_UNSET= HEADERS DOCS MANPAGES EXAMPL
mbinations and store them. But the basic mechanism for it
should be a port option, imho.
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2016-07-11 11:18, Vlad K. wrote:
There was a bug in older versions of the GitLab port. This is fixed
since 8.8.X is in the portstree.
Ok, I'll try with the latest repo.
I reinstalled everything from scratch (it's a VPS dedicated just for
gitlab), with the latest version and
repo.
No log in /usr/local/www/gitlab/log/ ? All logs of GitLab port are
going into this dir.
No, I meant no error logged (in any of the logs). Nothing in gitlab's or
nginx' logs that would tell what exactly failed. Only that there was a
timeout, which
ErrorPage: serving predefined error page: 502
Yes, the initial visit to the app root redirects to /users/password/edit
which times out. Any suggestions what I should try next?
--
Vlad K.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
36 matches
Mail list logo