Re: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

> > From: Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/04/17 Tue AM 08:51:42 PDT > To: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: > Subject: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db > > On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: > > > I am missing some

Mailman virtual-mailman.db

I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual-mailman.db. I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db I have gonne through the docs but am obviously missing something. Could anyone please let me know: 1. How virtual-mailman.

Re: ports installation location

PLEASE DISCARD LAST POSTING IT HAD WRONG ERROR REPORT - This is the correct one -- apologies > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 10:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Scot He

Re: ports installation location

> -Original Message- > From: Scot Hetzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 8:16 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ports installation location > > On 3/30/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > &g

Re: ports installation location

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Hetzel > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:29 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ports installation location > > On 3/29/0

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wesley Shields > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Vizion > Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts > > On

Ports - proposal - To handle Multiple instances

> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 4:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Lowell Gilbert; Wesley Shields > Subject: WAS ORIGINALLY RE: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts > > > >> > .. much deleted > >> > > The past dialogue has encouraged me to an idea to discover > whether anyon

RE: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

>> .. much deleted >> The past dialogue has encouraged me to an idea to discover whether anyone thinks its implementation could provide a generic solution for any port needing multiple installation instances. It may be there is another way of achieving the same goal but here is my two pennywor

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:46 AM > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts > >

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

>>> -Original Message- >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion >>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple vi

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile > so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a > chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head yester

Re: ports installation location

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garrett Cooper > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:21 AM > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ports installation location > > Vizion wrote: > > How does one s

ports installation location

How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port? For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this? How about upgrades? david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.or

joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

Hi Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts. Thanks in advance david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

Re: samba3 compile failure --SOLVED!!

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure > > &

Re: samba3 compile failure

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: samba3 compile fail

Re: samba3 compile failure

Vizion wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion >> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:37 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: samba3 compile failure >> >> Trying to

Re: samba3 compile failure

> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote: > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > >> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:15 AM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: samba3 compile failure

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: samba3 compile failure > > Vizion wrote: > > I am tryin

Re: samba3 compile failure

Vizion wrote: > I am trying to compile samba... > > Is the cause something up with my kerberos installation (see errors below)? > If so I do not know how to fix it :-( > > If not what and how can I fix it?? > > Is any more information needed to help identify the cause o

Re: samba3 compile failure

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: samba3 compile failure > > Trying to compile samba... > Is up with my kerberos? > If

samba3 compile failure

Trying to compile samba... Is up with my kerberos? If so I do not know how to fix it :-( If not what?? Thanks in advance david Compiling lib/smbldap_util.c Compiling smbd/server.c Linking bin/smbd libsmb/clikrb5.o(.text+0x109c): In function `smb_krb5_get_keyinfo_from_ap_req': : undefined referenc

mail/maildrop marked as broken

As title for information New today: portupgrade -a reports: FAM system mismatch: gamin is imstalled and desired FAM system is fam david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, s

Re: Portupgrade failed

al/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 > > Thanks > > Joachim from similar thread: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze > Sent: Wednesday, March 2

Re: Portupgrade failed

al/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 > > Thanks > > Joachim from similar thread: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze > Sent: Wednesday, March 2

Re: Portupgrade failed

al/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 > > Thanks > > Joachim from similar thread: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze > Sent: Wednesday, March 2

Re: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [LoN]Kamikaze > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:10 AM > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError > > Vizion wrote: > > The e

Re: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul > Ooi Cong Jen > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:08 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError > > try to upgrade

Re: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: portupgrade query -- MOVEDError > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# portupgrade -a > /u

portupgrade query -- MOVEDError

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# portupgrade -a /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:119:in `fill': MOVED file format error (PortsDB::MOVEDError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:113:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:113:in `fill'

RE: (no subject)

> >> They will? Why? > >> While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously > >> create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the > >> current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - > >> heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not notice. > >>

pkgdb -F --guidance

Hi I seem to contimually struggle with how to use pkgdb -F. I really do not understand how to determine what responses I need to give to the various prompts provided by pkgdb. Is there a guide anywhere - if not would someone be kind enough to inform me and maybe we could add it to the section

gnome-vfs-2.16.3 -> stale dependency question

running pkgdb -F I am getting **Stale lock file was found. Removed Stale dependency: gnome-vfs-2.16.3 ->geimdal-0.7.2_2 (security/heimdal Install stale dependency? What is the appropriate response? Yes would result in an attempt to install heimdal which is not practical due to conflict with krb

Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (no subject) > > > > > -Original Mes

(no subject)

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed? > > Vizion writes: > > &

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed? > > > Michael Johnson writes: > > > > Can anyone tell me if

Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Hi Can anyone tell me if the vulnerabities for mozilla-1.7.13_1.2 are due to be fixed in the near future? If not should it not be dropped from the ports tree rather than using up processing time only to generate build errors when running portupgrade -a? Thanks David _

Re: Apache2.2.4 -ssl module error on new upgrade

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 9:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Apache2.2.4 -ssl module error on new upgrade > > Hi > Extract from error.log after upgra

Apache2.2.4 -ssl module error on new upgrade

Hi Extract from error.log after upgrade to 2.2.4 /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: /usr /local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "ap_get_server_banner" Does anyone know how to fix this? Thanks in advance David

Re: libMagick -compile error -SOLVED+-!!

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 4:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: libMagick -compile error > > can anyone tell me how to deal with this.. > > Thanks

Re: libMagick -compile error

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 4:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: libMagick -compile error > > can anyone tell me how to deal with this.. > > Thanks

libMagick -compile error

can anyone tell me how to deal with this.. Thanks in advance.. How does one find the source of a missing library? In this case the error is 'cannot find -lgvc' Where can I look up to find what I need to install?? thanks David mv -f coders/.deps/coders_dib_la-dib.Tpo coders/.deps/coders_dib_la-d

PORTSUPDATING -is it too terse for users to be useful?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PORTSUPDATING -is it too terse for users to be useful? > > Hi > > Sorry

PORTSUPDATING -is it too terse for users to be useful?

Hi Sorry to say I find this extract in PORTSUPDATING a bit too terse. I wonder if there could be some elaboration on the advice given in PORTSUPDATING for those who do not understand the implications. IMHO it is not very helpful to have an absense of procedural detail in such a critical file. S

kde3base-3.5.5/kdm compile error _SOLVED

Hi Still having trouble with kde. The new problem (see below) may be connected with BSDPAN problem. Does anyone know how to fix this?? Thanks in advance --- T_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -D_GNU_SOURCE -M

kde3base-3.5.5/kdm compile error

Hi Still having trouble with kde. The new problem (see below) may be connected with BSDPAN problem. Does anyone know how to fix this?? Thanks in advance --- T_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -D_GNU_SOURCE -M

(no subject)

Vizion wrote: > I guess You need to update your graphics/libart_lgpl. > > wbr, > pluknet > > Thanks for the info > > However I tried that but still got the same result... > > Could there be some other explanation?? I had this problem a few days ago, and simply

Re: Failure kdelibs3-5.5 from portupgrade

> Can anyone help top identify the problem -- so I can fix it?? > > Thanks > - > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I. -I../kio/kssl -I../kjs > -I../kdefx -I../kdecore/network -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdefx > -I../kdecore -I../kdecore -I../kdecore/network -I../kdeui -I../

Failure kdelibs3-5.5 from portupgrade

Can anyone help top identify the problem -- so I can fix it?? Thanks - c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I. -I../kio/kssl -I../kjs -I../kdefx -I../kdecore/network -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdefx -I../kdecore -I../kdecore -I../kdecore/network -I../kdeui -I../kio -I../kio/

Re: portupgrade query

> -Original Message- > From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 5:57 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: portupgrade query > > Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> -Original

Re: portupgrade query

> -Original Message- > From: Sergey Matveychuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:54 PM > To: Vizion > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: portupgrade query > > Vizion wrote: > > I have multiple lines of stale dependencies

portupgrade query

I have multiple lines of stale dependencies reported from pkgdb -F all of which relate to bsdpan-Archive-Tar-1.30 or 1.16 witha report that the package is held. The lines are Stale dependency:bsdpan-Archive-Tar-[version] -> [see NOTE below]: -> Ignored (the package is held; specify -f to force)