On 03/03/14 11:33, Saifi Khan wrote:
Hi:
on attempting to build sage-6.1.1 from the '/usr/ports/math/sage' port,
the build errors out while building a subpackage 'conway_polynomials'.
Most people have reported errors in scipy and matplotlib with
FreeBSD-10. I think the build of conway-polyno
On 01/31/14 07:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:19:46AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I maintain the port math/sage. The port builds its own version of the
libreadline library. The port also uses lang/gcc instead of clang,
because the port needs Fortran.
The
On 10/30/2013 09:02 AM, Alex Laurie wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Only really just getting into FreeBSD but I am inspired to help out. I'm
> not a developer or anything. However I do like to install and update
> things. I though one area I may be able to help out is in the ports side of
> things. I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:22 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:44 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen
>> Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>>> Here you are:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/piper
I have not been following discussions recently. There is this new thing
called staging. I don't seem able to find the original emails where
this was introduced.
Is there an email or a website which explains in some detail how staging
works? It is badly messing with a port I am developing. I ca
On 08/27/2013 05:53 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> What is the best way to submit 4 or 5 ports at once (I have all the port
> files themselves stored on the same site that the distfiles are on and
> contain the same general pattern of ftp:://site.com/XXX/port-0.1.tar.gz)...
> so I do it one PR per por
un, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> mailto:step...@missouri.edu>> wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2013 06:33 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
> > Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports?
>
> Also, if gnome3 goes into ports, is there any chance
On 06/09/2013 06:33 PM, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
> Is there any ETA on getting GNOME 3 into FreeBSD ports?
Also, if gnome3 goes into ports, is there any chance we could keep a
legacy gnome2 going for a while? I discovered that I really hate gnome3
based upon my usage with ubuntu, and I have switched
uname -a
FreeBSD wilberforce 8.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.4-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Apr 2
16:51:28 CDT 2013 stephen@wilberforce:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
The problem was fixed by uncommenting the line in Makefile
#USE_GCC= 4.6+
I think these are the relevant pieces of the make process
On 05/09/13 13:15, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 May 2013 18:36, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
So I have a port, math/sage, which now contains in Makefile the line
USE_TEX=tetex
I have intalled the texlive ports. So now if I try to install math/sage, it
gives me error messages about
So I have a port, math/sage, which now contains in Makefile the line
USE_TEX=tetex
I have intalled the texlive ports. So now if I try to install
math/sage, it gives me error messages about CONFLICTS, which I think
arise from the fact that math/sage thinks that it has to first install
On 05/06/13 11:40, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote
in <5187c454.2050...@missouri.edu>:
st> Many thanks for creating the texlive port!
st>
st> I am trying to install the recent japanese/tex-ptex port. It seems to
st> spend several hours doing:
st>
Many thanks for creating the texlive port!
I installed the texlive-full port (without tex-ptex). I tried to change
the page size with the following command (as root):
tlmgr paper letter
cannot setup TLPDB in /usr at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 4965.
___
Many thanks for creating the texlive port!
I am trying to install the recent japanese/tex-ptex port. It seems to
spend several hours doing:
fmtutil: running `ptex -ini -jobname=ptex -progname=ptex ptex.ini
#ptex' ...
Is this normal?
If it is normal, would it be OK if japanese/tex-ptex where
On 04/03/2013 12:34 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Also interesting is cat/netgen, whose Makefile states:
>> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MOCC}
>> BROKEN= The opencascade port needs to be updated before OCC
>> will work
> (this is why I'm cc-ing stephen).
My initial naive attempts to build netgen wi
If in my Makefile I have:
USE_GCC=4.7+
USE_FORTRAN=yes
and then I type "make test-gcc", I get
CC=gcc47 - CXX=g++47 - CPP=cpp47 - CFLAGS="-pipe
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc47"
F77=gfortran46 - FC=gfortran46 - FFLAGS="-pipe
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc47"
LDFLAGS=" -Wl,-rpath=/usr/loca
I am looking at committing a port which creates the following files:
/usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so
/usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.0
/usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.2.7
/usr/local/lib/libGmsh.so.2.7.0
libGmsh.so is a link to libGmsh.so.0, which is a link to libGmsh.so.2.7,
which is a link to libGmsh.so.2.7.0.
M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2013 07:10 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/texlive-20130228-1.tar.gz
It built successfully. But when I tried to run the command
tlmgr
I got the following error message:
Can't locate TeXLive/TLConfig.pm in @INC
On 02/09/2013 11:16 AM, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> Dnia 2013-02-09, o godz. 16:56:03
> Chris Rees napisał(a):
>
>> On 9 February 2013 16:42, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
>> wrote:
>>> The first line of security/super/pkg-plist is:
>>> # $FreeBSD: head/security/supe
The first line of security/super/pkg-plist is:
# $FreeBSD: head/security/super/pkg-plist 307297 2012-11-10 17:38:33Z
pawel $
This has the unfortunate effect that the package install process thinks
that there is a file by this name. So for example, make deinstall produces:
pkg_delete: file '/usr/
On 01/12/2013 05:20 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>
>> man portsnap
>>
>> Does is work on non amd64/i386 arches
>> (sparc64 and ia64 specifically)?
>
> Honestly couldn't tell you, as I have no experience with or access to
> non-x86 systems.
portsnap is a shell script. I don't how it could fai
On 12/21/2012 05:07 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 21 December 2012 13:49, Ronald Klop wrote:
>
>> Try to set the environment variable MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=1 before building.
>
> If this fixes it please let us know - its a bug in the makefile that
> needs to be fixed.
>
> Also try -DMAKES_JOBS_UNSAFE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2013 03:49 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 21:47, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> Once you've created an svn diff and submitted it using send-pr,
>> how is the diff applied to update the port? I can't seem to
>> figure this out from reading
On 11/27/2012 07:06 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 28/11/2012 09:45, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>>> can be this daily spam turned off? i emailed there
>>>
>>> portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org
>>>
>>> but message was not delivered
>>
>> It's not spam, b
Hey, does anyone use the science/getdp port?
I took over maintainership, perhaps because at that time I was using it.
Now I am working on updating it to 2.2.1, which is quite a jump from
where it currently is at 1.2.1.
Anyway, I just wanted to check with anyone to see if this would be a
pro
On 10/02/12 11:23, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Are we supposed to be using cvs or svn to check out ports now? If cvs,
I'm getting prompted for a password which fails.
I think you are supposed to use *csup* or svn. But use svn - it is
easy, and csup is going to be phased out very soon.
_
On 09/17/12 11:43, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
wrote:
It was recently posted on,
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
discussion see
On 09/11/2012 03:59 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
Hi all,
Ever since I peeked at OpenBSD's ports [1] to see how they handle
headers, I've noticed something else nice that they do.
Instead of the plain, boring who-the-hell-is-this MAINTAINER line that we have;
MAINTAINER=cr...@freebsd.org
they have th
On 09/07/2012 07:36 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
For those reasons by February 28th 2013 the FreeBSD ports tree will
no longer be exported to CVS.
This question is curiosity more than anything else. What will happen to
the existing ports cvs. Will it merely stagnate, or will it be removed?
What
On 06/12/2012 11:20 AM, coder.tuxfamily wrote:
Hello,
I finished to make the ports of libgta
(http://gta.nongnu.org/libgta.html). But i don't really know what can be
the category.
Maybe "Math" because the lib is about Array.
What is your advice ?
My suggestion is the "devel" category.
Or pe
On 06/09/2012 11:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/06/2012 22:27, Dave Hayes wrote:
Personally, a 'pkg-options-descr' text file would suit me just fine.
For those on -ports, the context is, "How do we provide more information
about what the various options mean?" This idea seems reasonable to me
On 05/28/2012 01:38 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 28 May 2012 10:14, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
After my recent conversations about creating a print/texlive-install port, I
realize that my math/sage port might have a security risk. This only
happens if the user selects additional optional
On 05/28/2012 12:31 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 May 2012 18:11, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2012 11:35 AM, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
On 2012.05.28. 18:16, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 5/28/12 10:11 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
How about if I add lines like this
After my recent conversations about creating a print/texlive-install
port, I realize that my math/sage port might have a security risk. This
only happens if the user selects additional optional packages. But the
optional packages are downloaded post-fetch.
I'll make some immediate band-aid c
On 05/28/2012 11:35 AM, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
On 2012.05.28. 18:16, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 5/28/12 10:11 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
How about if I add lines like this:
.if !defined(IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK)
IGNORE= has a security risk because it downloads a file \
without
On 05/28/2012 11:29 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
On 05/27/2012 09:19 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 May 2012 18:14, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
There are a number of issues. In particular there is no checksum
calculated
for install-tl-unx.tar.gz because I suspect that it changes very often
On 05/28/2012 10:44 AM, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2012 09:06:18 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
2. fontconfig is a run dependency as well, xetex needs it to run.
Thanks. What about perl - is that a run dependency as well?
Yes, it is, install-tl and tlmgr are perl scripts
On 05/28/2012 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 5/28/12 10:11 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
How about if I add lines like this:
.if !defined(IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK)
IGNORE= has a security risk because it downloads a file \
without a checksum. Define IGNORE_SECURITY_RISK to build
On 05/27/2012 09:19 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 May 2012 18:14, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
There are a number of issues. In particular there is no checksum calculated
for install-tl-unx.tar.gz because I suspect that it changes very often.
This is a security risk and must not be
On 05/27/2012 08:48 PM, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 20:32:14 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hi People,
I have written a simple port which is in essence a wrapper around the
texlive installation script. It also builds (almost) all of the binaries
from scratch.
Does anyone
On 05/27/2012 09:19 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 May 2012 18:14, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
There are a number of issues. In particular there is no checksum calculated
for install-tl-unx.tar.gz because I suspect that it changes very often.
This is a security risk and must not be
On 05/27/2012 08:14 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hi People,
I have written a simple port which is in essence a wrapper around the
texlive installation script. It also builds (almost) all of the binaries
from scratch.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Would anyone mind if this port was
Hi People,
I have written a simple port which is in essence a wrapper around the
texlive installation script. It also builds (almost) all of the
binaries from scratch.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Would anyone mind if this port was
committed?
There are a number of issues. In partic
On 05/26/2012 11:33 AM, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:38:18 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/26/2012 09:19 AM, Nikola Lečić wrote:
This is what I have done, and it has worked very well - except the
xdvi program that came with texlive was linked to a different version
of
On 05/26/2012 09:19 AM, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2012 09:01:37 -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:42:50 +1200
Sam Lin articulated:
This was already repeated many times on this mailing list, but I guess
it won't hurt to remind that vanilla TeX Live works on FreeBSD (from 7.0
On 05/12/2012 08:06 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 06:31:44PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/12/2012 06:25 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/12/2012 01:24 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Suddenly I'm getting:
pkg_delete: the package info for pa
On 05/12/2012 06:25 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 05/12/2012 01:24 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Suddenly I'm getting:
pkg_delete: the package info for package "Source" is corrupt
Any ideas?
Is it possible that you created a directory by accident inside
/var/db/pkg
On 05/12/2012 01:24 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Suddenly I'm getting:
pkg_delete: the package info for package "Source" is corrupt
Any ideas?
Is it possible that you created a directory by accident inside
/var/db/pkg called "Source"?
_
On 05/07/2012 04:14 PM, Bruce Meier wrote:
Freebsd 8.2 release
processor amd64
#more start.log
[2012-05-07 01:11:58] Sage version 4.8, released 2012-01-20
Setting permissions of DOT_SAGE directory so only you can read and write
it.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/ports/math/sage/w
I'm now done as well.
On 04/10/2012 10:05 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Done from my side, now it's your turn!
Best
Nakata Maho
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge
ports will be updated accordingly.
Dat
On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Stephen, and ports@
I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against
octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since
it is a sweeping commit.
Now ports tree has been unfrozen.
Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update w
On 04/09/12 21:56, Mel Flynn wrote:
On 4/10/2012 04:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in
the presence of package B.
2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed,
and if it is then add B
So suppose we are building port A. It turns out that the configure in
port A autodetects whether package B is present or not. It will build
either way. But if built with package B, it will not operate without it.
So suppose I build port A on machine X which has package B installed.
Then I c
On 03/28/2012 11:13 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
PORTREVISION is historically bumped when you change the resultant
package under the default OPTIONS. Basically if you cause the package
to be rebuilt on pointyhat then you need to bump it.
I was going to say the same thing. But then I thought:
On 02/14/12 08:40, b. f. wrote:
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing
On 02/12/2012 03:17 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:52:56PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 20:45, "Steve Kargl"
wrote:
laptop:root[252] uname -a
FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb 4
09:03:27 PST 2012 root@laptop:/usr/obj/usr
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing math/sage on
redports.org. It reported an error building the dependency math/atlas,
which built fine on mine and
On 02/12/2012 02:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So instead of proper report to the port's mai
On 02/12/2012 01:39 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Is there any reguirement that a ports committer needs
to test their intended commit prior to pulling the
trigger?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/print/ghostscript9/Makefile
You should report which version of FreeBSD you are using. It mi
On 01/21/2012 09:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 01/21/2012 03:02 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
If I build a port that uses "USE_FORTRAN", then the variable ${LDFLAGS}
has an extra space in it. For example
%cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
%make -V LDFLAGS
-Wl,-rpath=/usr
On 01/21/2012 03:02 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
If I build a port that uses "USE_FORTRAN", then the variable ${LDFLAGS}
has an extra space in it. For example
%cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
%make -V LDFLAGS
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46
%make -V MAKE_ENV
LDFLAGS="
If I build a port that uses "USE_FORTRAN", then the variable ${LDFLAGS}
has an extra space in it. For example
%cd /usr/ports/math/lapack
%make -V LDFLAGS
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46
%make -V MAKE_ENV
LDFLAGS=" -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46" ...
I am trying to create a port in whic
On 01/17/2012 08:43 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Matthew D. Fuller
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:51:11PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
The manual method would be to install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and
use a command like `pk
On 01/17/2012 07:51 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I have just been cleaning up the mess caused by the upgrade of xcb-utils.
On my systmes I have hundreds of ports that will be re-built by the methods
listed in UPDATING, even though the vast majority of them are only
dependent on other ports that are d
On 01/15/2012 09:40 PM, Da Rock wrote:
What is the correct way to contact the maintainer for a port? Does one
contact directly? Or through a list (this one?)? Or pr?
I'm trying to contact the maintainer of the acroread ports to see if
they can put in a dependency on linux-f10-cups-libs for the e
On 01/11/2012 10:14 PM, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/12/12 13:59, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:48 PM, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/12/12 13:01, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I usually see this error when there is a command that doesn't belong
to a target. For example, if I cre
On 01/11/2012 09:48 PM, Da Rock wrote:
On 01/12/12 13:01, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I usually see this error when there is a command that doesn't belong
to a target. For example, if I create a Makefile that contains only:
echo xxx
I get the same error. So I think it is something i
I am trying this out. Looking at the instructions on
https://redports.org/wiki/UserGuide:
svn co https://svn.redports.org/
mkdir www
cp -pr /usr/ports/www/phpvirtualbox www/
svn add www
svn commit -m "phpvirtualbox added"
shouldn't there be a second line "cd " or something like that?
I want to create a port that uses devel/gdcm as a dependency. But writing:
LIB_DEPENDS+= gdcmCommon:${PORTSDIR}/devel/gdcm
doesn't work. It does build the port, but it fails to detect that the
port is installed.
I notice that when I type:
ldconfig -r | grep gdcm
that it doesn't find the ins
On 10/22/2011 01:18 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Romain Tartière wrote
in<20111011101902.gb14...@blogreen.org>:
ro> Hello!
ro>
ro> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:23:48AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
ro> > On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
ro> >
On 10/10/11 07:23, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't m
On 10/10/2011 07:23 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn'
On 10/10/2011 06:44 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Are there any plans on getting these committed to the mainline ports
tree? I'd be willing to work with you on that.
I agree with Eitan. I don't see a reason why texlive shouldn't make it
into the mainstream ports. What you need is to work with some
On 10/10/2011 03:29 AM, Romain Tartière wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under
/usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is
there some grand texlive-build-all port that
Hey guys, I did
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portshaker-config install
# Ensure TEXLIVE is checked
portshaker -v
Now I have a whole bunch of texlive ports installed under
/usr/ports/print. Am I just supposed to build the ports I need, or is
there some grand texlive-build-all port that is i
On 10/02/2011 11:17 PM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: qhull-1.0_2
Committers on the hook:
eadler kmoore stephen sunpoet thierry
It should be fixed now.
_
I am sending this to you because you maintain a port that depends upon
math/qhull. I plan to move this to math/qhull5, because the new version
of qhull is not necessarily compatible with the port(s) you maintain.
This is the complete list.
games/kdegames4, math/labplot, math/octave-devel, math
On 09/25/2011 08:19 PM, Jerry wrote:
When attempting to build the "math/fftw3" port, the following error
message is immediately displayed and the build halted:
Variable CFLAGS is recursive.
I have filed a PR against it.
I am unable to reproduce this problem. Is it possible that so
On 09/13/2011 09:11 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> particularly nasty thing to do. I get the impression that each
> committer has his own special way of doing this. For example, I have
> personally found that a simple grep won't work, bec
On 09/13/2011 04:10 AM, Michal Varga wrote:
And if it wasn't Gabor's commit that again brought my OS down to
unusable level, it would be the one next week, or if we are lucky, two
to three weeks from now (but that would be probably this year's record).
Because the current procedures in place not
On 09/12/2011 06:09 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:05:58PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:55:56 +0200
Michal Varga articulated:
So again, thank you for taking your part in ensuring that my days with
FreeBSD (the remaining few, so to say) won't become too boring.
On 09/06/2011 07:32 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2011-Sep-06, 07:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits
On 09/06/2011 06:26 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm pr
On 09/06/2011 04:18 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi,
you're receiving this email because one of your ports depends on
x11-toolkits/fltk, according to
$ grep fltk /usr/ports/INDEX-9 | cut -d '|' -f 6 | sort | uniq
I'm preparing an update to fltk-1.3.0 and I would like to give you the
chance to tes
I would like to make some changes to math/arpack, so that math/arpack
and math/lapack can be linked in the same binary. My proposed solution
is a bit unusual, so I would like to solicit comments before I commit it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159129
I assume that most of you ha
On 07/20/2011 07:31 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On 7/20/11 4:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have a couple of questions.
1) Why does portlint complain if a port is not DATADIR compliant?
The warning is very conditional. It tries to provide information so one
can make an informed
I have a couple of questions.
1) Why does portlint complain if a port is not DATADIR compliant?
What was the rationale behind making ports DATADIR compliant, so that if
one types "make install DATADIR=/somewhere_else" then what would be
stored in /usr/local/share/port_name will now be in /som
On 07/19/2011 01:41 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
1. Spell out very clearly its purpose - is it to populate a jail, for
example?
Populating a chroot/jail is one purpose.
Another is to test a new version of a package without messing up the
existing version.
I don't see how these two goals are compat
On 07/19/2011 09:40 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I didn't get a reply from the maintainers, so post here.
- Forwarded message from Anton Shterenlikht -
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:13:26 +0100
From: Anton Shterenlikht
To: thie...@freebsd.org, de...@stasyan.com
Subject: science/paraview,
current -> ports
On 07/16/2011 09:02 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Unless say, you're doing package installation outside of a
chroot/jail, to populate something inside a chroot/jail before you
start said chroot/jail.
I can see "-P" and "-p" working for those many ports which just put
programs in p
Does anyone want to take the math/bamg port? Or at least tell me that
they use it?
It is now at version 1.0.0, and the current version's master site has
disappeared. Also, it seems to be part of freefem++, and that port has
disappeared from the FreeBSD ports.
If no-one responds I will set
current@ to ports@ again. (Sorry, my mistake.)
On 07/16/2011 11:10 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 16 Jul 2011 17:04, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" mailto:step...@missouri.edu>> wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2011 10:53 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16 J
Replacing current@ with ports@, just like Chris did.
On 07/16/2011 10:53 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 16 Jul 2011 16:38, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" mailto:step...@missouri.edu>> wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2011 04:26 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>> Am 16.07.2011 u
On 07/15/2011 06:28 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hey people,
I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hey people,
I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144597
When I sent a message t
On 07/15/2011 04:57 PM, Warren Block wrote:
FWIW, I think the original code with a better regex like Jung-uk Kim has
in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068737.html
is still the way to go. If the port requires a special desktop entry
filename, that seems beyond the sco
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
