Re: luasocket namespace clash with lighttpd mod_magnet

Noone cares? On (2009-08-22 22:26), Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hey, > > Basically - luasocket defines buffer_init(); which is common enough to be > defined > elsewhere and it is defined in mod_magnet, so you end up with a SIGSEGV. > The attatched patch solves the issue by

Re: luasocket namespace clash with lighttpd mod_magnet

? On (2009-08-22 22:26), Robert Nagy wrote: > > Hey, > > Basically - luasocket defines buffer_init(); which is common enough to be > defined > elsewhere and it is defined in mod_magnet, so you end up with a SIGSEGV. > The attatched patch solves the issue by renaming

luasocket namespace clash with lighttpd mod_magnet

Hey, Basically - luasocket defines buffer_init(); which is common enough to be defined elsewhere and it is defined in mod_magnet, so you end up with a SIGSEGV. The attatched patch solves the issue by renaming the buffer_* funcs to ls_buffer_*. Its a totally safe diff that does not affect anythi