is done:
http://superb-sea2.dl.sourceforge.net/project/scidvspc/source/scid_vs_pc-4.5.tgz
Now you can figure out the SF/whatever expansion with trial and error.
I think they trying to discourage what we are doing - direct linking
to specific mirrors and bypassing the load balancer. Right now a
ated, then whatever is
in pkg-plist is added (at the end, IIRC). See math/scilab for an
example.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &
't know the
backstory). It would have been best to post the list and patch at the
start, not defensively in response to criticism.
Also, you suddenly getting involved probably didn't help, because it
just gave the appearance that you guys were trying to double-team
Doug.
--
Rob F
f the tree and the PRs will turn up a few bugfixes that I've submitted.
>
It was said in the past that there is a Fedora 11 RPM (not from the
cd, but an update) that has the patch and works as a drop in
replacement.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-
ebsd-81r-i386# make install
There are a couple problems with this: first, some ports conflict, so
you can't have everything installed installed at once. You need to use
something like tinderbox to have the builds isolated from one another.
Secondly, as you've noticed, the
d this
port recently should check their system.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e.
>
Try adapting this:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=210863
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:08, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 21:00, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:25, Eir Nym wrote:
>>> Firstly, it is optional part.
>>
>> You didn't answer my question:
>>
>> .if exists(/bin/csh)
>
e off limits because you have chosen to remove them
from your system.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
tch should probably retain alphabetical order.
>
> Your patch should check if tcsh is in system. it is optional component.
Why? What do you suggest happens if it isn't found? Nothing will break
except stuff that uses the variable and it would use the variable
because it needs csh. It is
is probably more on the reporters to
submit a fix - maybe upstream php has one?
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ses the damage. I don't think
anything depends on portmaster so its not really necessary.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ime, great, if not,
that's fine too.
The port is security/wipe and the only difference between 2.3.0 and
2.3.1 is a Makefile tweak regarding uninstallation (since we use
pkg-plist, not the supplied target, it doesn't matter).
--
Rob Farmer
___
fr
What is the best practice for no-op port updates - i.e. version 1.0
and 1.1 produce identical FreeBSD packages but they might be different
on Linux/elsewhere? Update to have to port appear "current" or avoid
forcing people to do unnecessary updates?
--
s no
firefox, which alone is probably a dealbreaker for most people.
I personally like Ade's suggestion, since it makes a gui opt-in for an
application that functions perfectly well without one.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
site.
As another (potential) solution to this issue, I've been meaning to
try building openjdk with the GCC java compiler, but I haven't gotten
around to it yet.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:34, Lars Engels wrote:
> editors/vim-lite is console only.
>
That seems to disable a lot of other stuff too.
.if !defined(LITE)
MAKE_ARGS+= CONF_OPT_FEAT="--with-features=big"
However, I will definitely take a look at it. Thank you for suggest
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:24, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:51:42PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:54, Wesley Shields wrote:
>> > While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes you're discussing,
>> > do yo
issues and numerous polite requests (including
with patches) to fix them have been summarily ignored or rejected. So
don't act surprised when people start to get annoyed by the situation.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
quirements to distribute source to people in those
countries would not hold up in court because they are a violation of
federal law.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To uns
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 21:32, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 09:09 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>
>> Around 6 months ago, a similar thing was proposed for a number of
>> eclipse plugins - they can all be installed and updated via the
>> builtin update manager and nothing
sistent version to all users and update them using
whatever methods they already use for other ports.
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
7.1.1 build-282343. It has
kernel modules for 8.0 i386 & amd64.
http://www.predatorlabs.net/dl/vmware-tools-freebsd-711.iso
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubsc
naries for releases and open-vm-tools is marked broken on
current.
--
Rob Farmer
>
> current# pwd
> /usr/ports/emulators
> current# mv vmware-guestd6 vmware-guestd6.old
> current# tar xzf ~guru/vmware-guestd6.tar.gz
> current# cd vmware-guestd6
> current# make
> ==
wget:${PORTSDIR}/ftp/wget
22 FETCH_CMD= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/wget
23 FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS= --no-check-certificate
24 DISABLE_SIZE= yes
This has nothing to do with ports/Mk and fetch would still be used if
the maintainer hadn't overridden it.
--
Rob Farmer
__
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Rob Farmer wrote:
>
>> I just came across what I think is a potential problem in portmaster
>> (3.0). I csup-ed today and ran portmaster -a. This machine had ports
>> last updated on August 9th.
&g
I think this is an issue because ghostscript is a build dependency of
en-freebsd-doc (indirectly: textproc/docproj-jadetex >
textproc/docproj > print/ghostscript8). Thus, the new documentation
tools will be built after the new documentation is built with the ol
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/MOVED.diff?r1=1.2188;r2=1.2189
--
Rob Farmer
>
> Thank you,
> Yuri
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsub
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:38 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 07/24/2010 23:38, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 7:49 PM, jhell wrote:
>>> # New ports collection makefile for: python26
>>> # Date created: 3 July 2003
>>> # Whom:
;t actually upgraded the port yet.
It's discussed in the committers guide:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#AEN1391
--
Rob Farmer
>
> Use it, or remove it ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> jhell,v
>
> _
x27;t know enough about
compilers to say for sure if that would cause the problem or not, but
its probably a good starting point.
--
Rob Farmer
>
>
> --
>
> ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
> -- Propellerheads
>
>
adapted to deal with French patent
laws. As such, not a whole lot of stuff uses it (or probably will in
the forseeable future), but on the other hand it is explicitly listed
on the FSF's approved licenses page.
--
Rob Farmer
>
> I'd also say that if you have a regular update plann
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:28 PM, wen heping wrote:
> Are you working on scilab-5.2.2 ?
>
> wen
>
Yes - it builds and I got the ocaml issues worked out too, I just need
to do a little bit of testing and I should have something to submit
later today or tomorrow.
--
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Thu 22 Apr 2010 at 08:48:55 PDT Rob Farmer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Lars Engels
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 22/04/2010 01:45, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> > I maintain math/scilab and am preparing to update it. This port has a
>> > huge plist (slightly unde
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 22/04/2010 01:45, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> I maintain math/scilab and am preparing to update it. This port has a
>> huge plist (slightly under 15000 lines), hundreds of which change
>> depending on what options are sel
, would this be a good idea? And if so, what is the
best way to make one?
Thanks,
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
really matters is how can it stop it creating this file?
There's a PR related to this (ports/143924) - it is a problem with the
port and hopefully will be fixed soon.
--
Rob Farmer
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing li
don't do
> this, so the impact is limited, but it does break some test builds and
> utilities, as you have seen.
Yeah, I realize this is kind of an unusual situation and I understand
that with the ports freeze coming up that now is not a good time to be
making these kind of changes, but
/math/scilab/work/scilab-5.2.0.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/lcvs/ports/math/scilab.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/lcvs/ports/math/scilab.
525.48 real 378.00 user 155.49 sys
--
Rob Farmer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 07:50:19PM -0800, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> I submitted PR 142414 to update graphics/lcdtest and the PR was closed
>> with the message "Committed. Thanks!" but I don't see where it was
>&g
Hi,
I submitted PR 142414 to update graphics/lcdtest and the PR was closed
with the message "Committed. Thanks!" but I don't see where it was
actually committed. Could someone take another look at this? Thanks.
--
Rob Farmer
__
42 matches
Mail list logo
