Hi all,
I have firefox3 installed. my make.conf shows USE_GECKO=firefox.
When I try to install any port (in particular today, the latest eclipse 3.3.2 )
which uses USE_GECKO, www/firefox is pulled into the dependencies, rather tha
firefox3.
I use portupgrade to launch the eclipse upgrade ( portup
Howdy,
I felt adventurous and installed portmaster , and got rid of portupgrade...
happy so far, except I miss the functionality of pkgtools.conf , in particular,
the ALT_PKG_DEP functionality.
for example, I use firefox 3. I don't want ffox 2 as well i am reinstalling
www/mplayer-plugin.
hi,
FYI, trying to upgrade cln-1.1.13 to cln-1.2.2. It's been happening for quite a
while already..
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
-pipe -march=pentium-m -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -I../include -I../include
-I./base -c ./base/hash/cl_rcpointer_hashw
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:59:03 + (UTC)
Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though it would be usefull to have a full log of package operations in
> machine and human readable format for review/auditing and similar
> purposes.
ah. nice thought. something that kicks in when /var/db/pkg/
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:59:12 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:38:21 +0200 "Ivan Voras"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
[...]
> > As a matter of fact, i don't really see why
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:27:40 +0200
Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Apologies for the mini top-post, and the confusing quotingis there a
mailer that will actually quote properly ? :P ) )
> >>> BTW, I thought of another problem scenario. The user installs
> >>> port M, and it brings depe
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:38:21 +0200
"Ivan Voras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, I thought of another problem scenario. The user installs port M, and it
> > brings dependencies D1, D2, and D3. Then the user installs port N which also
> > has port D2 as a dependency.
>
> Port N then won't ins
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:41:28 +0200
Peter Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, ^C works to get out of the hang.
you may want to attach ktrace to the "hung" process to see what its up to
behind the scenes...
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Anyone who isn't confused
Hi there,
I've been having problems upgrading fpc-utils to its latest incarnation.
The error i was getting was not during build, but at install (either make
reinstall or make package), with the following error:
[...]
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/lang/fpc-utils/work/fpc-2.2.0/utils/h2p
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:35:07 +0200
Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I don't known if the problem is with subversion or the ports or between
> subversion and FreeBSD. So I just post this message on subversion-list.
Hi Albert,
what exactly is your setup, on both client and serve
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:31:49 +0400
Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add back
> > the WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
>look at devel/py-subversion and java/subversion-java ports, which are
> TRUE ports now an
Hi guys,
thanks for the upgrade to subversion 1.5! Would it be possible to add back the
WITH_JAVA and WITH_PYTHON knobs ?
thanks,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"A tyrant...is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people
may require a leader."
P
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:46:17 -0800
Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Norberto Meijome said:
> > Hi Beech et al,
> >
> > First of all, thanks so much for getting the latest linux version
> > working on FBSD :)
> >
> &
Hi Beech et al,
First of all, thanks so much for getting the latest linux version working on
FBSD :)
Some issues:
- the url to get the OSS file isn't correct - the correct one it is now
http://www.skype.com/go/getskype-linux-oss
If for some reason it doesn't work, i am happy to provide hosti
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:51:33 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh... why do people always recommend portupgrade to users without
> telling them of the caveats? I grow tired of this. So let's tell
> Navneet exactly what he's getting into, shall we?
thanks for the info Jeremy, v
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:17:03 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to install OpenOffice 2.3 under 7.0-BETA2. It built fine under 6.2
> The full error I get is
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon Nov 5 08:09:34 2007]
> /us
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:17:59 +0100
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:27:30 +0100
> > "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Norberto Me
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:27:30 +0100
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > hi,
> > Anyone can shed any light on this?
> >
> > portupgrade -p firefox
> > []
> >
> > cc -o experimental.o -c -I../../
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 19:16:41 -0600
Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Google Desktop available for FreeBSD? I mean can it be run using
> the Linux compatibility layer on FreeBSD?
> How about Tracker? Is it good enough? I have a lot of PDF files, and I
> need something to be able to search ins
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:38:10 + (UTC)
Tor Egge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello :) ,
> >
> > i'm trying to install linuxthreads as part of a requirement for audio/grip,
> > under 7.0-BETA2. It builds ok and installs ok , but when trying to build
> > the package, it seems there is a file
Hello :) ,
i'm trying to install linuxthreads as part of a requirement for audio/grip,
under 7.0-BETA2. It builds ok and installs ok , but when trying to build the
package, it seems there is a file listed in the spec that is not included in
the port. see below
install -d -o root -g wheel -m 0
hi,
Anyone can shed any light on this?
portupgrade -p firefox
[]
cc -o experimental.o -c -I../../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include
../../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DSQLITE_ENABLE_REDEF_IO -DSQLITE_SECURE_DELETE=1
-DTHREADSAFE=1 -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD7\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DBUILD_ID=0
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:10:53 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to install filezilla. It built fine under 6.2, but under 7 i can't
> build one of its requirements ( x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 ). The last lines of this
> ports
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:22:40 -0800
Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Might somebody please explain to me why apache-2.2.6 is not install from
> /usr/ports ? I am attempting to complile with mod_ldap and a bunch of
> modules - nothing that should be causing a fuss, though.
Noah,
We need more in
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to install filezilla. It built fine under 6.2, but under 7 i can't
build one of its requirements ( x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 ). The last lines of this
ports builds are below, in particular :
/usr/local/lib/compat/libpthread.so.2: undefined reference to `__malloc_lock'
(the las
hi everyone,
I'm trying to install OpenOffice 2.3 under 7.0-BETA2. It built fine under 6.2
The full error I get is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon Nov 5 08:09:34 2007]
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
$ sudo make -DWITH_DEBUG=2 -DWITH_SYSTEM_FREETYPE -DWITH_CUPS -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
package
[]
/
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:54:52 -0400
Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Java JDK binary put out by the FBSD Foundation. While only 5.x and
> 6.x binaries are out, either they should work on 7.0 or it should be
> marked broken on 7.0 in the port tree (instead of letting me install it
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:46:04 -0400
Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto: Can you try running an actual jar application and not just
> -version ... -version works fine for me also, its actually get a jar to
> run where it breaks.
sure, what i just tested (launched them, clicked a
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:40:07 +0200
Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I the only one who have freezed keyboard leds in X after updating to
> Xorg 7.3? I doubt, since both my desktops with different keyboards
> exhibit this problem. They work fine on console.
HA! yeah, same here - no signs
hi ,
Ports tree updated 10 minutes ago. Tested twice, my network link is ok.
$ sudo portupgrade -pP blas
---> Checking for the latest package of 'math/blas'
---> Found a package of 'math/blas': /usr/ports/packages/All/blas-1.0_1.tbz
(blas-1.0_1)
---> Fetching the package(s) for 'blas-1.0_2' (m
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:26:48 -0300
"Pablo Murillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, I make the port for assp (/usr/ports/mail/assp) and I don't
> have MySQL installed, and I hit Enter to quickly (sorry), and now, I can't
> get the "options" screen again.
Hola Pablo,
man ports tiene tod
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:53:20 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:48:52 -0500 (CDT)
> "Doug Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > How can I tell if the package that is openoffice.org-2.2.1 has CUPS
> > support compiled in?
> >
> > Traditionally,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:07:25 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is more that there's a noticable delay between a
> port being updated and a matching set of packages being available.
At least for me, it hardly ever is an actual problem. I mean, building ports
fr
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Kurt Abahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Side note: I'm asking because I would definitely be
> willing to contribute since this would make using
> ports and packages together much easier.
I think the issue is one of building tens of thousands of applicati
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:38:25 -0700
Predrag Punosevac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Victor,
Hi Predrag,
( My name is @ end of this email...the quote was from Victor Hugo :) )
> I apologize if I offended anybody. I had best of intentions when I send
> the first mail.
all good :)
> I wish, I
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:05:52 -0700
Predrag Punosevac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I hope that they are aware but it seems that nobody is acting on
> these issues(or at least not fast enough).
Predrag,
as good as your intentions seem to be, the results would be better if you
provided he
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:52:58 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I gave up on getting Java working in Linux-Firefox. The
> > plugins _do_ show in about:plugins, but the Java test page shows
> > 'applet testvm not inited' (on the sun-jdk14 only, otherwise nothing).
> > The Ja
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:30:34 +0200
"Chris Billington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Which jdk should be used for the current version of linux-firefox
> (2.0.0.5)? (6.2-STABLE)
>
> I have tried linux-blackdown/jdk14, linux-sun/jdk15, and even the
> latest linux jdk 1.6 from the Sun
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:55:43 -0400
Tom McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just committed the fix for this. You should be fine after you
> update.
>
> tom
confirmed working fine. Thanks!!!
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Build a system that even a fool can u
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:35 -0400
Tom McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote:
> > Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
> > USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
> > Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: e
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:56:49 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes Aptana provides full support for rails developments and integrates really
> well with subversion. If you use Ruby on Rails and Ajax on Rails as part of
> Ruby development tools I would recomend Aptana without hes
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:44:22 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running Version: 3.2.2 with aptana mainly for Ruby, Ruby on Rails and
> Ajax on Rails programming and it is working fine
Hi David,
I took a look @ Aptana a few days ago and I am wondering whether it (the
Eclips
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:57:07 +0200
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody
> willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category?
Hi Pav,
where can I find some description of what is expected to be found in this
'geogr
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:03:16 -0500
Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:28:16 -0500
> > Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am unable to get PDF documents to open properly in Fi
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:28:16 -0500
Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am unable to get PDF documents to open properly in Firefox since I
> updated to xorg 7.2 and linux_base-fc-4_10.
Rick,
does Acrobat Reader work ok standalone?
what does actually happen when you click on a link to a .pd
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:18:50 +0200
Stefan 'Steve' Tell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I follow this howto (french howto) and have flash 9 working
> >
> > http://oregnier.developpez.com/cours/unix/freebsd/plugins/firefox/nspluginwrapper/
>
( guys, i still don't see how this relatest to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but i wont
move it
again to questions@)
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:46:59 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to this, you asked your Xorg to start with 800x600 and colour
> depth of 8, which it tried without error
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:52:51 +0200
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have submitted a problem report about my problems with xrandr/radeon.
>
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113861
>
> $ xrandr
> X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:26:59 +0100
Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root?
touche.
but from what OP described, that's what was happening... :D ouch :D
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Any society that would give u
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:33:43 -0700
Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so I'm required to resolve this myself if I want to install this port?
force uninstall bison and install bison2. fix all dependencies to bison with
pkgdb -F. carry on with OO.
granted, it's broken, but hardly critic
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
> kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
> nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:11:46 -0400
"Indigo 23" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After upgrading ports and subsequently upgrading to Gnome 2.18.2 from
> 2.18.1, gnome-terminal seems to have a problem where it just litters
> the window with various artifacts, I'm not sure if this is a
> gnome-terminal pr
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:31:33 +0200
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after reinstallation of my freebsd system (6.2-stable) i noticed the
> latest azureus (3.0.1.3_cvs) behaving erratically. also looking at its
> website it seems to me azureus is going to grow to accommodate new
> function
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:11:07 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:22:09PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 21:58:49 -0400
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 23,
On Fri, 25 May 2007 12:41:27 +0200
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you don't need XPM support in gd, put WITHOUT_X11=yes into
> make.conf and try again.
Thanks Alexander. I will keep this in mind.
>
> Yes, I agree that for new installs this is not nice, but if you don't
On Tue, 22 May 2007 21:58:49 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:51:50 -0400
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Th
On Tue, 22 May 2007 21:58:49 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This is a server, i rather have just the needed libraries instead of
> > > > the whole shebbang ( couldn't xorg-libraries install *just* the libX*
> > > > and the *proto ... is there any reason why this is not th
On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:51:50 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a server, i rather have just the needed libraries instead of the
> > whole shebbang ( couldn't xorg-libraries install *just* the libX* and the
> > *proto ... is there any reason why this is not the case?
>
On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:16:58 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shouldn't it realise there is no xorg installed at all and just use 7.2?
> > Just in case, i followed the xorg upgrade process (which did nothing of
> > course, including the rebase.sh) ... still nothing.
>
> The
Hi guys,
first of all, i wanted to thank everyone who was involved in the xorg update -
it was a massive rebuild that went mostly flawlessly. I had a couple of small
stops in my laptop but i fixed each in a matter of a few minutes... really glad
and impressed :)
anyway, I have a new box I'm set
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:24:36 -0700
"Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mark, and thank you for your prompt reply.
>
> Quoting Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Chris H. wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I just recenlly found that I am almost always unable to
> >> build X (Xorg) related ap
61 matches
Mail list logo
