On 08/02/14 14:04, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Michel Talon wrote:
>> So
>> how to interact with local.sqlite?
>
> Thanks Michel,
> Noted.
Further, if you really want to debug and inspect with text tools you can
simply do
$ sqlite3 local.sqlite .dump > dump.sql
or
$ sqlite3 -csv local.sqlite .du
On 06/02/14 13:58, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Rick Miller
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Big Lebowski
>>>
>> wrote:
The ability to install certain package version, instead of
inst
On 04/02/14 18:37, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> I had a huge list when I updated at approx 6am GMT.
> I did initially wonder why there wasn't much to update considering this
> but the explanation seems reasonable enough to me.
>
> Vince
>
OK, great, thanks! Peace of mind restored. :)
signature.
On 04/02/14 09:44, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 02/03/14 22:22, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
>>> Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around 00:20 and
>>> 06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is more or
On 04/02/14 08:12, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/3/14, 10:22 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 2/3/14, 9:59 PM, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
>>> Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around
>>> 00:20 and 06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this
>&
Was there a *huge* update to ports tree tonight between around 00:20 and
06:30 CET? Portsnap just fetched 24720 patches (this is more or less
every port I guess), but I can't find anything in
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ that would correspond to this.
I'm a bit worried. :)
signature.a
Hello,
Is it just me, or did the last revision[*] of editors/vim break options
for both it and editors/vim-lite? When I try to update vim-lite
optional dependencies from vim are forced on this port, so I get
mandatory Python, Lua, Ruby... with vim-lite. :)
I only ever install vim-lite, so just o
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:20:28AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:49:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> > The "netpbm-10.35.80_2" port won't build. There is a notation that the
> > previous version has to be removed first. I saw something here a few
> > days ago regarding that p
