I'm working on new versions of the sigrok ports (libserialport, libsigrok,
libsigrokdecode and pulseview being the critical bits). While the C things
all build and seem to work with little problem, the GUI package - pulseview
- fails to link with a bunch of references to undefined variables. Those
After a discussion on another list, I'm wondering if anyone has ever done
anything to verify that the license requirements of the dependencies of a
package (I don't know of any licenses that would cause problems for a port,
as those don't involve distribution of derived works in the form of a
binar
The following reply was made to PR amd64/121951; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Squire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: amd64/121951: Javascript bug in _amd64_ version of Mozilla-Firefox
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:45:4
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >> 1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file
> >> (note tha
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> 1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file
> (note that .if and .for processing is done while parsing); c) processing
> targets.
Make and submakes have been gone over already. See http://miller.emu.id.a
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:44:56PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > In summary, the ports infrastructure is really complicated because it's
> > trying to deal with all kinds of constraints and conditions. I challenge
> Reading this
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 04:40:28PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is to report a revised version of my program, intended to upgrade
> > a machine using mainly precompiled packages. All problems that i have
> >
