Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou wrote:
Hello list,
I'm just wondering why some ports are still using openldap-client23 (i.e
pam_ldap nss_ldap) instead of openldap-client24 ?
Is there any valid entry in make.conf to have openldap-client24 instead
of openldap-client23?
You can set WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=24
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering has anyone gotten this Micropolis Game to compile?
http://www.nabble.com/Micropolis-port-td14791178.html
OpenBSD has a port, I was wondering how hard it would be to make this
a FreeBSD Port?
Yes I did ported it (both the old fashioned version and
Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Sergie,
>
> I really appreciate your efforts with cfengine. I've discovered its use in
> maintaining 8 different sites with fairly complex configuration
> requirements. Is there any chance that you could update the kit to 2.2.3,
> as there won't be another upgrade to c
Hi,
Here is the output:
%
/bin/sh ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating lib/Makefile
config.status: WARNING: lib/Makefile.in seems to ignore the
--datarootdir setting
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: WARNING: src/Makefile.in seems t
TooMany Secrets wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Two or three days ago, I recieved notification from portaudit program
> inidicating that there is a problem with lang/php4 port because some
> bugs in it.
> I would know (if it is possible) when will be updated to a bug free version.
According to the PHP developme
Ted Nicolson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PHP 5.2.4 has been released three weeks ago, but still is not available for
> FreeBSD (5.2.3 is the latest portversion)
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116182
>
> According to the above pr, "PHP 5 versions before 5.2.4 have numerous
> security vulnera
Jiawei Ye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This hit me when I tried bootstrapping JDK builds on a -current with
> Diablo JDK1.5.
>
> Running "java -version" returns
>
> Fatal error 'kse_create() failed
> ' at line 444 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_kern.c (errno = 2)
>
> Any workarounds for this?
sam wrote:
> developer's comment:
> Work on making NetXMS GCC 4.2.x compatible is almost done, and next
> version should compile without problems. We expect to release a new
> version in a week or two.
That's great!
By the way, can we separate the port into -server, -client and -agent,
so that th
Hi, Sam,
sam wrote:
> please send file 'config.log' in work path (after configure process)
I think you may want to try to build it on a -CURRENT box or with GCC
4.2.x, this is not a configure problem I think.
Let me know if you still want the config.log.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
>> Hi, Sam,
>>
>> sam wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, all.
>>>
>>>>> please appreciate my first port *NetXMS*
>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/114495
>>>>>
Hi, Sam,
sam wrote:
> Hi, all.
>>> please appreciate my first port *NetXMS*
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/114495
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Could not download the shar from your website. Is the one in the last
>> reply the latest one?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
> Hello
>
> I am included
Hi, Sam,
[redirected to freebsd-ports@ because it's more appropriate]
sam wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> please appreciate my first port *NetXMS*
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/114495
>
> *NetXMS* is new and rapidly developing monitoring system,
> released under GPL2 license. It can
Brian wrote:
> just incase you didn't know, I didn't see anything on the ports list for
> this.
>
> It wont build due to the off by one error.
Have you refreshed the vulnerability database? (portaudit -Fda)?
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power
Karl.Oulmi wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD Ports Management Team,
>
> I'm a sysadmin in a Institute of Biology in France. I'm using FreeBSD
> since version 4.0R.
> I have some projects in order to develop some high availability services
> (such SMTP or HTTP) for my Institute. I would like to install the mos
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Would someone handle following PRs of repocopy request?
>>
>> ports/114668
>> ports/114669
>> ports/114670
>> ports/114671
>>
>> anray@ said he was too busy to handle them.
>
> I'll care.
Please also consider:
ports/115132: [repoc
John Reynolds wrote:
> Hello all, I recently built up a new box running 7.0-CURRENT (to get support
> for devices on a new motherboard I bought). Everything's been going great thus
> far (kudo's to all involved!) but as I was building the java/jdk15 port
> tonight
> I ran into a problem. I had pre
Alexey Lebedev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is the output of make:
I have just committed a fix, would you please try sync'ing your ports
tree and try again?
(Please confirm that you have the latest
files/patch-bindings-Makefile.in:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/rrdtool/files/patch-
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> After upgrading tinderbox's jail to latest -current,
> miwi@ and I see this "bad system call (core dumped)"
> while building devel/glib20. My log is at
>
> http://www.rafan.org/tb/errors/7-FreeBSD/glib-2.12.12_2.log
>
> My tinderbox is running on 6.2-RELEASE. Not sure about
>
Hi,
Paul Laudanski wrote:
> Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2.
> Please let me know where I can help.
Thanks for your offer. Currently we are in a ports freeze (which means
that only a selected subset of port committers and the security team can
commit durin
Hi,
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> From: "Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The
>> (web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I
>> click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...).
>>
>> Pebkac
Hi,
I'd like to look for a new maintainer for mail/spamd. I have a tarball
which consists checked out version (i.e. have CVS/ directories to make
it easier for future updates) which may be useful for its new maintainer.
Please contact me off-list for this.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alex Samorukov wrote:
> Please, reset maintainer of the mail/spamd.
>
> Version in the ports is buggy and outdated, and my PR`s are just ignored.
>
> See:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=spamd&responsible=&multitext=&ori
Chris wrote:
[snip]
> this 90_3 now fixes the high cpu utilisation problems?
Which problem do you refer? The update is to update it to 0.90.1 (from
0.90_3), but I have never encountered your problem so I can not tell
much :-( Do you have any test cases to exercise the bug?
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> I've just updated to 90_3 from 88.7 and i am seeing the following in
> freshclams logs:
>
> freshclam daemon 0.90 (OS: freebsd6.2, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386)
> ClamAV update process started at Sat Mar 3 17:45:14 2007
> main.cvd is up to date (version: 42, sigs: 83951, f-level: 1
Atz-Soft wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation:
>
> The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version.
> The program is no
Hi,
Rong-En Fan wrote:
> distinfo pkg-plist ports/lang/python24/files patch-CVE-2006-4980
> patch-setup.py]
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [I move to ports@ for discussion. Also CC'ing ncurses author]
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:07:32PM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
[...
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set
> the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4,
> which starts to get a bit rusty.
I vote for the change. Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.
Daniel Dvořák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The port has sources which did not work.
[...]
> $ dig @a.gtld-servers.net dns.measurement-factory.com A
That's incorrect. I don't think gtld DNS servers provide in-depth DNS
data or they get overloaded soon...
It works fine here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> dig dns.mea
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 03:12:41AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 00:38:54 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>
>>> A few days ago, my FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE based tester (i386) started to fail
>>> in building packages, most notably lang/gcc40, lang/gcc41 an
gareth wrote:
> On Wed 2007-01-24 (19:51), Gordon Stratton wrote:
>> On 1/24/07, gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
>>> it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
>>> and as far as i can tell the .php files are
gareth wrote:
> hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1.
> it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before),
> and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and naturally
> the database is untouched). does anyone know what this upgrade
> was meant to ach
boris starchev wrote:
> Hi
> I use Eclipse on Windows.
> There is Eclipse working on Linux!
> Is it possible to use Eclipse on FreeBSD?
Well, why not? :-)
Hint: /usr/ports/java/eclipse
Note that you may want to download a native JDK from the FreeBSD
Foundation. For detailed information, check /
gareth wrote:
> hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to
> be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of
> phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does?
>
> i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages
> from p
Erwin Lansing wrote:
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX - please
> wait.."/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/apache20/Makefile.modules.3rd",
> line 10: USE_APACHE and Makefile.modules.3rd can't be used together.
> ===> www/mod_log_sql2-dtc failed
> *** Error code 1
> *** Error c
Beech Rintoul wrote:
> I'm working on a port upgrade where the sourcefile has a different name from
> the port. For example the port is called myport-6.2 but the distfile is
> called myportsrc. I used DISTNAME= myportsrc. in the makefile and the same in
> distinfo. It fetches correctly but when
Hi, Beech,
Beech Rintoul wrote:
> Would one of the comitters please grab ports/106623 and commit it? The pr
> contains two important security patches for ftp/proftpd. I'd like to see
> these get into the tree asap. Thanks in advance for your time.
I have just committed the patches found in port
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> 'k, I don't know how to fix this one ... I thought about doing:
>
> .if ${OSVERSION} <= 492101
> RUN_DEPENDS=nc:${PORTSDIR}/net/netcat
> .endif
>
> not sure which version brought in nc, but 492101 is the last of the 4.x
> series
> ... but it portlint fails miser
Hi,
I have just committed a change that have changed the default BDB version
that OpenLDAP 2.3 and 2.4 servers use. It's recommended to do a backup
before the upgrade, and use slapadd to restore the data afterwards.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - Th
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi delphij!
>
> I found a problem that openldap23-server doesn't reflect
> PTHREAD_LIBS=ANY (like -lthr). Please check following patch.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/
Erwin Lansing wrote:
> Portmgr is pleased to announce that Pav Lucistnik has accepted the
> challenge of being a portmgr member. Pav has been with the project for
> a long time and is one of our most active committers and bug busters.
> He has been working on the ports infrastructure and will now
Hi, Philipp,
Philipp Ost wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I fixed this error which occurs when installing /lang/f2c via ports:
Thanks. We are aware of this issue, but this is more a gzip regression
rather than a wrong distfile. A possible workaround for this would be
to use minigzip instead of gunzip. I
Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:33 +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 04:21:43PM -0500, Carlos Ramirez wrote:
>>> Hi.-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why Ethereal is not in the ports list?
>>>
>> Ethereal is now Wireshark, project's name changed a few months ago.
>>
>> B
Hi,
In ports/102613, the submitter has pointed out a problem that the build
infrastructure can not detect the present OpenLDAP configuration at
build time, and thus causing dependency problem when being rebuilt.
This occurs on some other ports as well.
Is it possible to make the package registrat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having some problems with php5 port.
>
> I have two machines with standard php5-extensions (from ports) install...
> And I'm unable to install Zend Platform in both.
>
> I have asked about it in ZP forum.
> http://www.zend.com/forums/index.php?
> t=msg&th=1
Marco Merli wrote:
> Hi,
> I've read your mail: Please Help (Thu Sep 4 06:26:55 PDT 2003 )
> at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2003-September/004268.html
>
> About the complilation of Pysol 4.82 for winXP: Have you any news, please?
> I have the same problem.
>
> Thank you
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
[snip]
> I'm curious. Do you have a purpose in sending all these messages to the list?
> Are you asking a question without actually asking it? Making a statement of
> some kind without explicitly saying what it is? What?
Well, the world is imperfect, and sometimes the au
在 2006-08-18五的 10:50 +0400，Roman Bogorodskiy写道：
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>
> > As a maintainer of several ports, I can assure you that I would not be
> > interested in doing *more* work on the ports than I already am. And my
> > ports are relatively simple ones. Imagine the guys who do KDE and
47 matches
Mail list logo
