--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No such facility
> exists, and I don't imagine anyone creating one any
> time soon because
> it would be VERY hard to accomplish for a large
> number of reasons.
If you don't mind, could you please elaborate on this?
Side note: I'm asking because I w
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're
> trying to
> accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just
> describe what your
> goal is.
I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
pa
--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote:
> > I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
> > synchronized with that from which the latest
> packages
> > in packages-6-stable were built.
> >
> &g
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Thank you
Be a bet
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with the latest packages in order to
minimize version mismatches and to allow easy mixing
between them. So far I've been using a hack that does
a listing of the packages-6-stable directory on the
freebsd ftp, and uses the mt
Hi Everyone,
I often find that the installed bsdpan-*
pseudo-packages aren't of
great use to me. Would it be possible to add a
"WITHOUT_BSDPAN"
config option for the perl5.8 port in order to neglect
the installation of the BSDPAN modules? I looked at
the Makefile for
the port to see if I could do
Hi Everyone,
I often find that the installed bsdpan-*
pseudo-packages aren't of
great use to me. Would it be possible to add a
"WITHOUT_BSDPAN"
config option for the perl5.8 port in order to neglect
the installation of the BSDPAN modules? I looked at
the Makefile for
the port to see if I could do
