On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it,
> and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is,
> one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-)
> Now, there's a good chance that it
On 04.01.2015 18:24, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On 02.01.2015 12:03, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>> I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to
>> manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental
>> builds don't quite work as I expected.
>>
>> poudriere rebuilds all pa
For the record: I was using different HP inkjet printers with
FreeBSD for years, but printing via CUPS/hpijs stopped working
couple of months ago. Scanning via XSane still works though.
I did some pkg upgrades and "portmaster cups hplip sane",
checked the regular suspects; device permissons, compi
freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
> I've spent a great deal of time getting GCC 4.4 ported to FreeBSD on
> i386 and x86_64.
Thank you for continuing the work on gnat-gcc.
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin
aries, your next step is:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
= > should've been addressed by using FORBIDDEN/IGNORE instead.
= Perhaps you're right. However, I'd like to hear the opinion of a lawyer
= as to whether this is acceptable or not.
What happened is bad for porters and other users. It would be nice if
t
Steffen Beyer wrote:
Currently, there are several files to patch. Usually I would run "diff
-r" to create one large patch, but the build system -- and the rules ,)
-- expect a separate diff for each file to be patched.
Is there an easy way to create this set of files, i.e. cutting the patch
into
Robert Backhaus wrote:
On 4/18/07, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The
current consensus is that portmaster, which is a collection of sh
scripts, should be further developed and eventually committed to the
base system.
The developer of portmaster is one of those who does not really like
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
I'm thinking about setting up an automated on-demand
mirroring for BSD ports. Until that happens, I can
deal with some requests manually. Tell me more about
your distfile, if you want to.
It's GCC 4.1 with GNAT Ada compiler used to bootstrap
later versions of GNAT-GCC,
ds for his distfiles?
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Thank you very much!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Is somebody able to fix this quickly or should I
say something for the GnuCash FAQ?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(Glibc)
libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
lama#
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Geez, I deinstaled _everything_, wiped /usr/local,
/var/db/pkg/ and /var/db/ports and rebuilt, but
GnuCash still does not work.
Ok, not precisely; it just never starts :)
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
, but the symptoms were ... as ever: it hangs
there doing very little, no window nor message ever comes
out.
Any ideas what could be the problem? Do I still have
to manually patch something?
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
--
> uname -a
FreeBSD *** 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Sun Jan 21 06:3
I've built it with patches mentioned in the PR plus
some touches. I use it for a month now and did
not find any quirks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
How about using gmake instead of scons?
Isn't it deprecated? Here is my port; it
builds the most simple working Blender but
doesn't install/deinstall at all. I'm
unfortunately out of time, so if someone
wants to pick it up ... be my guest.
blender.tbz
Description: Binary
e a look at Martin
Krischik's site at http://ada.krischik.com/index.php and
bring back the subject on comp.lang.ada.
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port
to improve, except if I provide separate
binaries for FreeBSD 5 and maybe 6. I'll keep abusing
your bootstrapper till then ... and yeah, thanks for that
too ;)
--
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc packages will
appear on FreeBSD FTP sites?
Get a buildable package committed to the FreeBSD ports tree.
Ups, sorry, they _are_ on the main site. They're jus
re on a FreeBSD package, I can no longer provide
the port for that package ... or do I? Damn, who
invented this chicken and egg thing :)
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
x27;d like you to know that my priority
is simplicity and stability and that I am grateful for
your reports which helped me in that direction.
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
gnat-gcc34.tbz
Description: Binary data
gnat-gcc41.tbz
Description: Binary
Petr Holub wrote:
... maybe because I have lang/gnat already installed?
I don't know at the moment about this. Maybe you could try and help me a
little?
And why do we need gnat-gcc34 anyway?
I figured out you must have some other GNAT installed, and that caused
the GCC configure to break. I
Yeah, I was able to reproduce the error! Try to replace
the Makefile with the one attached here.
# ex:ts=4
# Ports collection makefile for:gnat-gcc
# Date created: 22 Jun 2006
# Whom: Karel
Petr Holub wrote:
another problem with building gnat-gcc41 (after I've manually upped
the math/mpfr port to 2.2.1 and installed it).
Please open the Makefile for this port and add flags "--without-gmp
--without-mpfr" to the CONFIGURE_ARGS variable. Rebuild and tell
us what happens.
__
Alex, thanks for your reply. stiv @ blender forums pointed me to the
sixth paragraph in the SCons' manual:
"scons does not automatically propagate the external environment used to
execute scons to the commands used to build target files. This is so
that builds will be guaranteed repeatable reg
I'm trying to make a port of the latest Blender with the SCons build.
The scons command in the do-build target in bsd.scons.mk is expanded in:
/usr/bin/env /usr/local/bin/scons \
CCFLAGS="-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" \
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" ...
Which gives an error:
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
hat do you think? Do I have other options?
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Boris Samorodov wrote:
BTW, gnat-gcc34 is for i386 only. Does checking for other archs at
makefile mean that at the near future the port won't be i386 only?
I tried to keep things from other GCC ports I do not fully understand
or can not test in. Limitation on i386 architecture counts in case
y
it's copied from the gcc41 port and I thought it is
good enough. Maybe I should send those messages to /dev/null?
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsu
06? Statement
in the current Makefile saying 'Because of licensing and
registration restrictions, you must fetch the source
distribution manually...' is misleading. Sources are GPL
licensed so I don't see why we don't provide them?
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
_
32 matches
Mail list logo