On 14.09.2012 09:53, Hannes wrote:
> On 13.09.2012 16:27, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:55:07PM +0200, Hannes wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> a while back I created a new (updated) port of graphics/luminance and
>>> discussed w
On 13.09.2012 16:27, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:55:07PM +0200, Hannes wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> a while back I created a new (updated) port of graphics/luminance and
>> discussed with the original port maintainer (in CC) that he wants to
&
On 13.09.2012 13:55, Hannes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> a while back I created a new (updated) port of graphics/luminance and
> discussed with the original port maintainer (in CC) that he wants to
> transfer ownership of the port to me.
>
> I also worked with danfe@freebsd (al
right.
--
Best,
Hannes
PS: please CC me, I am not subscribed to freebsd-ports@
diff -ur graphics/luminance/Makefile graphics/luminanceNEW/Makefile
--- graphics/luminance/Makefile 2012-06-06 08:43:55.0 +0200
+++ graphics/luminanceNEW/Makefile 2012-07-25 15:43:21.774575985 +0200
@@ -2,17
hi everyone,
since a couple of weeks sysutils/kports is now available.
it is an advanced KDE-frontend for the ports, designed also at more
experienced users, but being being rather easy to use.
i justed wanted if any of you have tried it, what impression you got, and if
you have any suggestions
is behaviour?
i hope i am not bugging you too much,
thanks for your help
greetings
hannes
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> This may well be. However, GNU/Linux systems using the pthread variant,
> there is little hope anyone is ever going to fix the kthread variant. I
> have included the kthread variant as an added benefit, but all development
> and bug fixing really should go into the pthread variant.
>
> You did
