Re: Poudriere error: cannot rollback ..., there is a snapshot ... more recent ....

2020-03-20 Thread George Hartzell
Miroslav Lachman writes: > [...] > Any possibility that you have some kind of automatic snapshoting utility > run from crontab recursively on filesystem where poudriere have builder > jails mounted? > > I saw this error when I setup zfsnap in crontab with resursive snapshot > of /vol0 (e

Poudriere error: cannot rollback ..., there is a snapshot ... more recent ....

2020-03-20 Thread George Hartzell
I have a FreeBSD 12.1p3 (just updated) root-on-zfs system that's having trouble doing Poudriere builds. It started off life as a FreeBSD 12.1 system and has been building it's own set of packages using Poudriere successfully since its inception. I few updates ago I started seeing errors in the

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-17 Thread George Hartzell
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > You should really have a look at overlays which are supported in > poudriere-devel, it will allow you to get rid of portshaker with your use > case: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/rP510950 > > in poudriere an overlay is just a "regular ports tree" appende

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-16 Thread George Hartzell
@lbutlr writes: > [...] > Not sure I quite get how the Webserver lets your other machines get > the packages in such a way that they can be dropped in place, [...] Nicely described in the DigitalOcean Tutorial[do] But basically, you put your tree full of built packages somewhere where the

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-16 Thread George Hartzell
Dan McGrath writes: > [...] I am not sure about repo priorities, or how you would deal > with conflicts with build options that pull in common ports. It is > something I have been meaning to look into, sorry! Perhaps someone else > here can give some advice? > One way to solve this is via "po

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-16 Thread George Hartzell
John Kennedy writes: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:02:39PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > > [...] > > Am I writing a config file for this every port I want to build? > > Personally, I have a single, custom make.conf that I maintain and shove into > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d (default location I belie

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-16 Thread George Hartzell
@lbutlr writes: > On 15 Feb 2020, at 21:43, Dan McGrath wrote: > > You would run "poudriere bulk", then sit back sipping coffee while it > > churns through all of the packages. > > Hang on a second, so the intended use for poudriere is to build ALL > packages? That's not a poudriere constra

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-15 Thread George Hartzell
@lbutlr writes: > [...] > Sorry for the rather basic questions. > I'm also a poudriere beginner and/but I found this DigitalOcean tutorial very useful: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-a-poudriere-build-system-to-create-packages-for-your-freebsd-servers g. __

Re: What is the actual syntax used to FLAVOR ports?

2020-02-11 Thread George Hartzell
Mathieu Arnold writes: > [...] > Flavors have been documented from day one. > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/flavors.html > > (I kinda know because I wrote (most of) the flavors code, and I also > write (most of) the documentation.) But, and I think that this is whe

Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker.

2019-09-25 Thread George Hartzell
On Sep 25, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:18:36 -0700, George Hartzell wrote: >> I wasn't aware of PORTSDIR, I'm a long time ports user but this is my >> first foray into not simply using the stock FreeBSD ports tree. > &

Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker.

2019-09-25 Thread George Hartzell
Romain Tartière writes: > [...] > Can you try setting PORTSDIR to your target ports tree, e.g. > > % sudo env PORTSDIR=/usr/local/poudriere/ports/default portshaker -M Setting PORTSDIR fixes it for me (different directory, but it works). > My guess is that since Mk/bsd.port.mk was not found

Re: Problem overriding ports with portshaker.

2019-09-23 Thread George Hartzell
George Hartzell writes: > > I've been happily using portshaker to merge my "personal" ports tree > [1] with the standard tree, then building things with poudriere. Up > until today the things in my tree were additions. > > Today I tried rep

Problem overriding ports with portshaker.

2019-09-22 Thread George Hartzell
I've been happily using portshaker to merge my "personal" ports tree [1] with the standard tree, then building things with poudriere. Up until today the things in my tree were additions. Today I tried replacing the standard copy of audio/logitechmusicserver with a customized version that includ

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

2010-07-07 Thread George Hartzell
George Hartzell writes: > Brooks Davis writes: > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:45:49PM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: > > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > > George Hartzell wrote: > > > > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > > &

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

2010-07-07 Thread George Hartzell
Brooks Davis writes: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:45:49PM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > George Hartzell wrote: > > > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > &

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

2010-07-03 Thread George Hartzell
Emanuel Haupt writes: > George Hartzell wrote: > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > Hi > > > > > > The current audio/squeezeboxserver port is still broken for me. I > > > just built a package set with an up to date ports tree and > > &

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

2010-07-03 Thread George Hartzell
Emanuel Haupt writes: > Hi > > The current audio/squeezeboxserver port is still broken for me. I just > built a package set with an up to date ports tree and installed them in > a vanilla jail to make sure that there is no previous cruft which could > possibly be a problem. > > After inst

Re: FreeBSD Port: squeezeboxserver-7.5.0_1

2010-06-05 Thread George Hartzell
Mark writes: > Hi, > I've been using this port for some years to power my Squeezebox devices > - thanks for keeping it up to date. > > However, the latest update has killed my installation totally - first it > would not scan my music, and after upgrading perl & perl module ports I > can

Re: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-radeonhd-1.2.1_1

2008-06-16 Thread George Hartzell
Coleman Kane writes: > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 18:41 +0200, jean-christophe wrote: > > hello, > > > > i would like know if a new version of radeonhd port is prevu. > > [...] > > Probably not until they release a new driver. However, I've just been > following their git tree directly and tha

Re: postgresql's 502.pgsql periodic script and passwords

2007-01-31 Thread George Hartzell
Michael Fuhr writes: > [...] > The "ident sameuser" method causes the backend to ask the OS what > user is at the other end of the Unix socket. If the OS username > matches the database username then the connection is authenticated; > otherwise it's rejected. You can use pg_ident.conf to def

Re: postgresql's 502.pgsql periodic script and passwords

2007-01-30 Thread George Hartzell
Michael Fuhr writes: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:23:52AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I've "solved" the problem by creating a ~pgsql/.pgpass file with the > > > pgsql user

Re: postgresql's 502.pgsql periodic script and passwords

2007-01-29 Thread George Hartzell
Bill Moran writes: > In response to George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I'm curious how other freebsd postgresql users handle databases with > > passwords and running the 502.pgsql periodic script. > > > > I've "solved&q

postgresql's 502.pgsql periodic script and passwords

2007-01-28 Thread George Hartzell
I'm curious how other freebsd postgresql users handle databases with passwords and running the 502.pgsql periodic script. I've "solved" the problem by creating a ~pgsql/.pgpass file with the pgsql users password. Is there a better way? g. ___ freebsd-