On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:51, Warner Losh wrote:
> With the recent parallelism work, the is true. It might save a couple percent
> off the build time. Before those changes, though, disabling all non target
> arches saved about 10% of the buildworld time.
I’m curious. How much is 10% in terms of minu
On Dec 18, 2014, at 5:02, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2014, at 02:17, NGie Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
>> As a request to speed up the build process further,
>> - Would it be [easily] possible in the clang35 branch to bootstrap
>>
On Sep 12, 2014, at 14:38, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> "No" (as portmgr).
>
> Ports should not be touching the base system like this. Let's NOT go
> backwards and add a /bin/bash. In fact the /usr/bin/perl one will be
> removed soon as well.
>
> If we can actually eliminate ports touching /usr and /
On Sep 12, 2014, at 14:53, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Rang, Anton wrote:
>
>>> If you want interoperability just use /usr/bin/env bash as a shebang.
>>
>> That doesn't work for this use case -- the user shell coming from LDAP
>> -- but I agree that the port shouldn't be modify
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
> Marcus von Appen wrote:
>> Alban Hertroys :
>>
>>>
>>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
>>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand
>>> that you think 2 years is enough time to sh
onf/189156: include/Makefile does not honor MK_GSSAPI == no
To: Garrett Cooper
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `conf/189156'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: freebsd-bugs.
You can access the state of your problem report at
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 03:48:34PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> So... trying to trim down dependencies in a ports build and I'm
>> confused as to why unzip in base (it's been in base for ~5 years)
>>
So... trying to trim down dependencies in a ports build and I'm
confused as to why unzip in base (it's been in base for ~5 years)
isn't a sufficient replacement for archivers/unzip in ports. It
doesn't seem like we're doing anything incredibly complicated with
archivers/unzip, so I would think
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Michael Vale wrote:
> -Original Message- From: Simon J. Gerraty
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 5:00 AM
> To: Michael Vale
> Cc: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org ; freebsd-a...@freebsd.org ;
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Cross Compiling of ports M
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 9/26/12, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where
>>&g
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> This patch fixed the problem, when buildig imake on a machine where
> clang is the base the compiler (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC).
(Picking a random message to reply to) Why not create PRs and CC the
relevant parties?
_
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
>> >> On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, "John Baldwin" wrote:
>> >>>
>>
>> I
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wr
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler
> wrote:
>
>> On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger
>> wrote:
>> > Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that
>> > I didn't create a package on the machin
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
...
There really is no need to be so clever here. The bootstrapping issue is
going to be a minor annoyance that affects a small percentage of our users.
I think Doug's correct in this case about it being a "one-time
problem" as installing via bsdinsta
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 1:08 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 8/21/2012 6:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> I would also like to just remove pkg_* tools from RELENG_10 if that fits the
>> schedule.
>
> Um, no?
...
> What _would_ be useful is what should have been done many years ago when
> it was
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Alexander Pronin wrote:
> Hello Community.
>
> My name is Alexander Pronin. I am a GSOC student at The FreeBSD Project.
> My project is "Parallelization in the ports collection and pkgng utility"
> I have created wiki page where I described problems that I have to
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, b. f. wrote:
>> > -dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it
>> > doesnt use
>> > specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
>> > this should be fixed in a clean way.
>> >
>> > Ie. we have to replace the -
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> -dumpspecs is a gcc internal thing that clang will never support (it doesnt
> use
> specs). It's wrong for ports to mess with the internals of the compiler and
> this should be fixed in a clean way.
>
> Ie. we have to replace the -dumpspec |
On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:
>
>> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
>> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
>> or you can use WI
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Matt wrote:
> On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/go
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> > The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>> > compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
>
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
>> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>>
>>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>>> Now I unders
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
> 10 'X' for their tenth ver
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, h h wrote:
Kevin Oberman writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to cho
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
>> With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
>> expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
>>
>> The issue stems from configure scripts (
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks
>> were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come
>> so
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
> ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example
> x11-toolkits/vte produces:
>
> gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
> discards
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/03/2011 12:11 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,
>> it's our turn :)
>>
>> Julien Laffaye (jlaffaye@) and I, helped by Philippe Pepiot (huge
>> cont
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:35:21 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-Mar-25, 15:03, Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> > >>> What about DB corruption/loss? Do you keep
>> > >>> the /var/db/pkg//xxx files even with pkgng and only
>> > >>> use
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hello Pav,
>
> Den 08/01/2011 kl. 20.34 skrev Pav Lucistnik:
>
>> Package cluster is quite clever, akshully, and since this is OT here,
>> just terse comments
>
> Sorry, replied to a bad message... redirecting to current@
>
1. adding S
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 00:45:01 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> Hi Lapo, I noticed that the current version of devel/monotone is set
>> at 0.48. Could you please upgrade the version to 0.48.1 with the
>> attached pa
Hi Lapo,
I noticed that the current version of devel/monotone is set at
0.48. Could you please upgrade the version to 0.48.1 with the attached
patch?
The attached patch also fixed the MASTER_SITES var.
Thanks!
-Garrett
Index: devel/monotone/Makefile
=
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ade Lovett wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2010, at 20:00 , Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Found the reference. The stuff that gets installed under
>> ${PREFIX}/tests (to some degree) are actually executables
>> ($(execdir)), and some are data files (
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2010, at 20:30 , Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> This request has been sitting mostly idle for the last 3 months. I
>>> realize
On Aug 20, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Anonymous wrote:
> Garrett Cooper writes:
>
>> The emphasis that Florent made too was to remove crud in pkg_install
>> and libpkg and get things down to more of a library form so we could
>> develop thin wrappers above pkg_install with logica
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 20:30 , Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> This request has been sitting mostly idle for the last 3 months. I
>> realize people are busy, but could someone with some time please help
>> me work out
On Aug 19, 2010, at 7:30 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 21:26, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>> On 19/08/2010, jhell wrote:
>>>>>> Adding to this I would like to see a central database created for
>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 19/08/2010, jhell wrote:
>> Adding to this I would like to see a central database created for
>> packages that have been removed like in Slackware Linux. They keep a
>> file in /var/log/preserved_packages with a flat text format with t
This request has been sitting mostly idle for the last 3 months. I
realize people are busy, but could someone with some time please help
me work out any issues that might exist with this port, and commit
this to ports? There are a _lot_ of developers that would be happy to
see this committed to
Hi,
I'm currently removing things from my tasklist that I don't have
time to work on, or pay attention to, and I have a handful of ports
that I should be removed from the maintainership for:
archivers/py-lzma
archivers/py-tarfile
comms/py-serial
devel/py-ctypes
devel/py-nose
devel/py-plex
deve
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> andrew clarke wrote:
>> On Wed 2010-07-07 02:06:39 UTC+1000, andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone confirm that subversion fails to build with www/neon28 and
>>> requires
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:06 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that subversion fails to build with www/neon28 and
> requires www/neon29? This is not mentioned in UPDATING.
I'm using neon28 and subversion without issues here, but I'm running CURRENT.
Thanks,
-Garrett
__
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jerry wrote:
> I am attempting top contact the maintainer of the "www/linux-nvu" port.
> I did a "make maintainer" in the port and this was revealed:
>
> /usr/ports/www/linux-nvu $ make maintainer
> i...@space.rootshell.ru
>
> Unfortunately, this address is not ope
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Anonymous wrote:
> Anonymous writes:
>
It's better to use -lstdc++ from same version of gcc by which the
program using it was compiled.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to determine which one?
>>
>> No. If there is an easy way I think strings(1) would show.
>
> Doh
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Greg Larkin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dave Abel wrote:
>> Any idea how I can get my hands on the posix test suite port source code? It
>> is not avaiable via their website currently. Any help you can offer would be
>> much appr
2010/6/27 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> I understand, that this change (ports/137855, bsd.port.mk:1.632) was
> made 6 months ago, but I've
> noticed it only now (twice in one day!).
>
> Am I only person, who thinks, that this change is HUGE POLA
> violation?
>
>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:43 AM, David DEMELIER
wrote:
> 2010/6/24 Freddie Cash :
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:04 AM, David DEMELIER
>> wrote:
>>> 2010/6/24 Janne Snabb :
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/6/23 Janne Snabb :
>>
>> I find it completely useless
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with gcc
> 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt
There are way too many standard C errors in ther
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:25 AM, b. f. wrote:
> lang/perl5.* fails with -fstack-protector in CFLAGS, when built with
> the base system compiler, on some architectures. I used the attached
> patch with the base system compiler and lang/perl5.10 on 9-CURRENT
> i386 to fix the problem. However, I ne
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
>> On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
>>> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
>>> BSD licences should be separated.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
> On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
>> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
>> BSD licences should be separated.
>
> Yes, they really are different licenses.
The BSD license has evolved over time. Comp
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> I am trying to install the graphics/png port on my PowerMac G4, which runs
> 8.1-beta1:
> r...@kg-g4# uname -a
> FreeBSD kg-g4.kg4.no 8.1-BETA1 FreeBSD 8.1-BETA1 #0: Fri May 28 04:38:56 UTC
> 2010 r...@xserve.lan.xcllnt.net:/usr/obj/u
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Thomas Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been wondering about something: When I write a script or webapp that
> needs some port to run, like a perl module, I install the needed port and
> life is good (tm). A year later when I've completely forgotten about the
> sc
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:17 AM, PA Zolczynski
> wrote:
>> On 05/06/2010 08:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> 2010/6/4 PA Zolczynski :
>>
>> See `config.log' for more details.
>> ===> Script
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:17 AM, PA Zolczynski wrote:
> On 05/06/2010 08:42, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> 2010/6/4 PA Zolczynski :
>
> See `config.log' for more details.
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> Please report the problem to po...@
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Michel Talon wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> > followed consistently. I know that the decisions are made on a
>> > case-by-case
>> > basis, but for my taste, it is too much case-by-case.
>>
>> I haven't done por
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Tao Wang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm doing a survey about the availablilty of some packages in
>> different platform, including FreeBSD release. I want to know whether
>> the package is existed in the specific FreeBSD release, and which
>> versio
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Michael Patrick
wrote:
> Good evening folks
>
> This weekend a friend and I upgraded our server to FreeBSD 7.3 using a source
> upgrade. The building and installing seemed to go well. In general
> rebuilding of ports to use the new libraries is working with the
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> The general argument follows below, I just need some anecdotal evidence
> first:
>
> Yesterday, I was chasing libintl.so.8, rebuilding all ports that got bumped,
> checking with libchk for other libintl.so.8 dependencies, and forcing a
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Bernardo Maciel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I recently ran into a problem when compiling python 2.6.5 under
> FreeBSD 8.0-p2 . I searched around, asked in FreeBSD forums (
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=14268 ) and then e-mailed
> the python-help mailing
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Janne Snabb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Big thanks to the folks who made "make buildworld" to use
> -fstack-protector by default since 8.0. This should make FreeBSD
> more secure.
>
> How about the ports system?
>
> I tried to re-build all my ports some time ago with the stac
On May 24, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> 2010/5/23 jhell :
>> That shouldn't actually be to hard. If a utility like the three main upgrade
>> tools that are being used the most right now would export a variable for say
>> "UPGRADING=yes" then the uninstall script could check agains
On May 23, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Indi wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:40:47PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, madal 30 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello here,
>>>
>>> I am a new freebsd user and would like to know how to ins
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, madal 30 wrote:
>
> Hello here,
>
> I am a new freebsd user and would like to know how to install port from link
> below:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/nav/
>
> There are not much info on howto for this particular package.
>
> Any help o
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:11 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 05/22/2010 19:23, Anonymous wrote:
>> BUILD_DEPENDS= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl85:extract
>
> Attached is the Makefile I just edited to configure against tcl and tk
> 8.5 instead of 8.4.
>
> I have verified it for functionality (as in) e
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2010 04:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>> On 05/22/2010 04:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 03:54:20PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> On 05/22/2010 04:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 03:54:20PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, I'm from ISPRAS and we have created an experimental system for
>>> monitoring and analyzing of upstream l
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hello, I'm from ISPRAS and we have created an experimental system for
> monitoring and analyzing of upstream libraries development. It may be
> helpful for analyzing risks of updating one of the distribution
> components (shared librarie
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:23:18 +0100
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, David DEMELIER
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I used pkgsrc for a while on NetBSD. I was used to the pkgsrc
>> > notifications about the users and groups
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Indi wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:51:30PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On May 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> >
>> > The ports in the devel category are especially noteworthy, since (if I
>> > unde
On May 19, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Wed 19 May 2010 at 05:10:49 PDT jhell wrote:
>> Adding to this bundle of madness...
>>
>> I believe that it would be best practice to keep ports/LEGAL up-to-date
>> with this list.
>>
>> Those who already have ports on a machine may find i
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:05 PM, David N wrote:
> On 19 May 2010 10:49, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:41, Charlie Kester wrote:
>>> Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to
>>> the
>>> list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org
On May 12, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having trouble compiling net-snmp on a number of 8-STABLE systems, below
> is the error.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
> creating libnetsnmpmibs.la
> (cd .libs && rm -f libnetsnmpmibs.la && ln -s ../libnetsnmpmibs.la
> libnetsnmpmibs.la)
>
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim A wrote:
>
> 1) I don't understand why the Textproc/Dixit port is so badly managed. The
> program itself is at version 10.4, while your unprofessional port still stays
> at version 1.0.1, claiming that the GCC 4.2 compilation is broken.
>
> 2) I don't underst
On May 2, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:46 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On May 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Robert Noland wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Demelier David wrote:
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
On May 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Robert Noland wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Demelier David wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143723
It seems adding CFLAGS+=-march-=native solved the problem but I
don't want to
keep this flag everytime in my make.conf
How this flag
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David DEMELIER
wrote:
> Hi freebsd-ports,
>
> This morning I wasn't able to make package in lang/python26 port.
>
> ===> Building package for python26-2.6.4
> Creating package /usr/ports/packages/All/python26-2.6.4.tbz
> Registering depends:.
> Creating bzip'd tar
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
> Aldis Berjoza writes:
>> Hello!
>
>> Some time ago I've read, that FreeBSD might be interested
>> to move ports tree to database (sqlite?).
>> This would require rewriting of all existing and writing
>> some new tools related to ports.
>
> I
On Apr 29, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> Some time ago I've read, that FreeBSD might be interested
> to move ports tree to database (sqlite?).
> This would require rewriting of all existing and writing
> some new tools related to ports.
>
>
> I'm IT student and next year I have to wr
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/25/10 17:15, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>> On 26/04/10 8:55 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I've just committed a fix for this problem to the svn (development)
>>> version of portmaster. You can find information on how to download it at
>>> htt
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> I have a package which is not built from a port (it is commercial software).
> I've put an +IGNOREME file in the package folder. But portmaster will not
> ignore it:
It's not ignoring it for -a (update).
Kind of funny though wh
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/23/10 12:16, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
>> Not sure, if I ran into the same problem, but I recall that sqlite3 needs
>> an option TCL_MODULES turned on in lang/tcl85.
>> Or, better, try to install tcl-modules by hand and see, if it helps.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Good day!
>
> I want add option in port's Makefile to depend on textproc/py-enchant.
> But how i can do it? It installs as python egg.
>
> .if defined(WITH_ENCHANT)
> RUN_DEPENDS+=${LOCALBASE}//enchant/__init__.py:${PORTSDIR}/textpr
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
>
> It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?
http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg
In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating
packages -- porters have hit some snags wit
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/17/10 23:48, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I recently updated -current, and all of my ports, and am now getting the
>> following message when I try to watch an avi file encoded with xvid:
>>
>> No suitable decoder module:
>> VLC does not support
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/10/10 3:35 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[...]
>> If I'm understanding you correctly you're saying it's an issue when I do:
>>
>> pkg_add A B C
>>
>> # 1 year passes
>>
>> pk
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 12:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Dominic Fandrey
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/04/2010 12:18, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Domi
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some
>>> others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to ma
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/10/10 12:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Adam Vande More
>>> wrote:
>>&
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> This morning I took a look at my outstanding PRs. There are
> is a ports PR I consider old and trivial:
>
> This one fixes a bug in the package-noinstall target. wxs told
> me that he prefers my proposed fix over his own:
> http://www.freeb
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> There's an outstanding bug to fix chroot(2)'ing functionality with
>>> pkg_add(1) [1]. Anyone that ha
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Ion-Mihai,
>
> Does this fix the following issue?
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2
>
> I try to use konqueror and I get
>
> There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror.
> The diagnostics i
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:02:46AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>> On 2010/04/05 01:50, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> I real
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi all,
> I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
> cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
> the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
&g
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
what needs to be fixed.
The following 3rd party libraries and all of their dependenc
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Edward Tjörnhammar wrote:
>> Thank you for your replies!
>>
>> I didn't have any special make.conf but tried using
>> fno-strict-aliasing as suggested by Garret and now it w
hn
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 04:24:05 -0700
>> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Edward Tj__rnhammar wrote:
>>> > The browser crashes on JavaScript intensive pages. I've tried to debug
>>> > the beh
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
