Re: Lynx -vulnerabilities- is this permanent?

2007-04-25 Thread Foxfair Hu
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2007.04.19 19:01:39 +0800, Foxfair Hu wrote: vuxml -> security-team's baby. Cc added. The problem is caused by interesting version numbering in the www/lynx-current port which now conflicts with www/lynx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:lynx-current] make -V PKGNAME lynx

Re: Lynx -vulnerabilities- is this permanent?

2007-04-19 Thread Foxfair Hu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:50:11AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: > On Thursday 19 April 2007 04:01:39 Foxfair Hu wrote: > > > > vuxml -> security-team's baby. > > Cc added. > > > > foxfair > > > > OK -- does anyone have any idea when this mi

Re: Lynx -vulnerabilities- is this permanent?

2007-04-19 Thread Foxfair Hu
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:10:41AM +0800, Foxfair Hu wrote: Lowell Gilbert wrote: David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: portupgrade -a produces following output for lynx on cvsup from today. freebsd 6.1 - --->

Re: Lynx -vulnerabilities- is this permanent?

2007-04-18 Thread Foxfair Hu
Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> portupgrade -a produces following output for lynx on cvsup from today. >> freebsd 6.1 >> - >> ---> Upgrading 'lynx-2.8.5_2' to 'lynx-2.8.6_4' (www/lynx) >> ---> Building '/usr/ports/w