http://kuikconsult.nl/ccpoyg/qkyoflifqyfpit.oknatqvxrsordvi
Forrest Aldrich
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
I noticed a few days ago that email destined to
ricochet-harves...@vipul.net has been queued. Scanning the host, port
25 and 80 are off. My guess is that Vipul simply abandoned it, as this
was his personal server and the project was created before he started
Cloudmark.
Therefore, perhaps
The entire distribution seems to have ^M (suggesting it came from a
different editor), FYI.
I don't see mention of a table to use in the blocksshd.conf file... does
this presume that the host system isn't using other tables?
Is this being defined by:
my ($exists) = system("$cfg->{pfctl} -t $
(see below)
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:02:34PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Since a recent update of Spamassassin to:
PORTVERSION=3.1.7
PORTREVISION= 3
I've noticed that each email that gets scanned causes the process to eat
up 80+% of the CPU time, and
Since a recent update of Spamassassin to:
PORTVERSION=3.1.7
PORTREVISION= 3
I've noticed that each email that gets scanned causes the process to eat
up 80+% of the CPU time, and it's slow...
I'm not really sure what changed.
Likewise, when I start it up for the first time, I see:
[ to
Since updating the port today from the previous version, I've not been
able to connect to any of my network smb shares... windows hangs as does
smbclient.
I'm researching the problem now, but figured I would give a heads-up
about it.
Anyone else seeing this.
This is on FreeBSD-6.1-STABLE. No
I'm having the same problem today - found this post via Google.
Is this a bug on FreeBSD or ?
As far as I can tell, apache20 was compiled with the correct options:
make WITH_PROXY_MODULES=yes WITHOUT_IPV6=yes WITH_BERKELEYDB=db42
WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes NO_WWWDATA=yes NO_ICONS=yes
and subs
